• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与:护理的前提条件——一项基于扎根理论的关于医疗保健专业人员对儿科护理环境中参与含义的认知的研究

Patient participation, a prerequisite for care: A grounded theory study of healthcare professionals' perceptions of what participation means in a paediatric care context.

作者信息

Carlsson Ing-Marie, Nygren Jens M, Svedberg Petra

机构信息

School of Health and Welfare Department of health and nursing Halmstad University Halmstad Sweden.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2017 Nov 27;5(1):45-52. doi: 10.1002/nop2.106. eCollection 2018 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.106
PMID:29344394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5762705/
Abstract

AIMS

To explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of what patient participation means in a paediatric care context

DESIGN

A qualitative explorative design with grounded theory.

METHODS

Fifteen healthcare professionals who worked in paediatric care settings were either interviewed or asked open-ended questions in a survey, during December 2015-May 2016. Grounded theory was used as a method.

RESULTS

The study results provide a theoretical conceptualization of what patient participation meant for healthcare professionals in paediatric care and how participation was enabled. The core category "participation a prerequisite for care" emerged as the main finding explaining the concept as ethical, practical and integrated in the care givers way of working. However, the concept was implicit in the organization. Four additional categories illustrated the healthcare professionals' different strategies used to enhance patient participation; "meeting each child where the child is," "building a relationship with the child," "showing respect for each individual child" and "making the most of the moment."

摘要

目的

探讨医疗保健专业人员对患者参与在儿科护理环境中所意味的内容的看法

设计

采用扎根理论的定性探索性设计。

方法

2015年12月至2016年5月期间,对15名在儿科护理机构工作的医疗保健专业人员进行了访谈或在调查中提出开放式问题。采用扎根理论作为方法。

结果

研究结果提供了关于患者参与对儿科护理中的医疗保健专业人员意味着什么以及如何实现参与的理论概念化。核心类别“参与是护理的先决条件”作为主要发现出现,将该概念解释为伦理的、实际的且融入护理人员的工作方式中。然而,该概念在组织中是隐含的。另外四个类别说明了医疗保健专业人员用于增强患者参与的不同策略;“在孩子所在之处与每个孩子相遇”、“与孩子建立关系”、“尊重每个孩子个体”以及“充分利用当下”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/913b/5762705/dcfaaabfdc18/NOP2-5-45-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/913b/5762705/dcfaaabfdc18/NOP2-5-45-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/913b/5762705/dcfaaabfdc18/NOP2-5-45-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient participation, a prerequisite for care: A grounded theory study of healthcare professionals' perceptions of what participation means in a paediatric care context.患者参与:护理的前提条件——一项基于扎根理论的关于医疗保健专业人员对儿科护理环境中参与含义的认知的研究
Nurs Open. 2017 Nov 27;5(1):45-52. doi: 10.1002/nop2.106. eCollection 2018 Jan.
2
Health professionals' perspectives on children's and young people's participation in health care: a qualitative multihospital study.医疗专业人员对儿童和青少年参与医疗保健的看法:一项多医院定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Apr;25(7-8):1035-44. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13152. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
Health Professionals' Perceptions and Practice of Family Centred Care for Children Injured in Road Traffic Accidents: A Qualitative Study in Ghana.卫生专业人员对道路交通伤害儿童的以家庭为中心的护理的认知和实践:加纳的一项定性研究。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Jul-Aug;53:e49-e56. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
4
Trusting relationships between patients with non-curative cancer and healthcare professionals create ethical obstacles for informed consent in clinical trials: a grounded theory study.非治愈性癌症患者与医疗保健专业人员之间的信任关系为临床试验中的知情同意带来了伦理障碍:扎根理论研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 1;22(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01204-6.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Creating a shielding place for children with leukaemia during sedation for intrathecal chemotherapy: A grounded theory study.为白血病患儿在鞘内化疗镇静期间创造一个屏蔽场所:扎根理论研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Feb;44:101711. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.101711. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Healthcare professionals' perceptions of digital health competence: A qualitative descriptive study.医疗保健专业人员对数字健康能力的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
Nurs Open. 2022 Mar;9(2):1379-1393. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1184. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
8
Does participation in ethics discussions have an impact on ethics decision-making? A cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals in paediatric oncology.参与伦理讨论是否会对伦理决策产生影响?儿科肿瘤学中医疗保健专业人员的横断面研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Jun;52:101950. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101950. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
9
Balancing values and obligations when obtaining informed consent: Healthcare professionals' experiences in Swedish paediatric oncology.获取知情同意时平衡价值观与义务:瑞典儿科肿瘤学领域医护人员的经历
Acta Paediatr. 2020 May;109(5):1040-1048. doi: 10.1111/apa.15010. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Ethical concerns when recruiting children with cancer for research: Swedish healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences.招募癌症儿童参与研究时的伦理问题:瑞典医疗保健专业人员的看法和经验。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Mar 14;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00901-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Person-centered care for common mental disorders in Ontario's primary care patient-centered medical homes: a qualitative study of provider perspectives.安大略省初级保健以患者为中心的医疗之家常见精神障碍的以患者为中心的护理:提供者观点的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 2;25(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02519-w.
2
Children's voices on their values and moral dilemmas when being cared and treated for cancer- a qualitative interview study.儿童在癌症治疗和护理中价值观和道德困境的声音:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 26;25(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01075-3.
3
Children's cognition and attitudes during long-term cancer treatment: an ethnographic study.

本文引用的文献

1
Better to know than to imagine: Including children in their health care.了解胜于想象:让儿童参与自身医疗保健。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):11-20. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1207724. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
2
'Kids need to talk too': inclusive practices for children's healthcare education and participation.“儿童也需要表达”:儿童医疗保健教育与参与的包容性实践
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Sep;26(17-18):2657-2668. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13703. Epub 2017 Feb 19.
3
Promoting participation in healthcare situations for children with JIA: a grounded theory study.
儿童在长期癌症治疗过程中的认知和态度:一项民族志研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Apr 16;8(1):e002405. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002405.
4
Impact of family-centered care in families with children with intellectual disability: A systematic review.以家庭为中心的护理对智障儿童家庭的影响:一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 15;10(7):e28241. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28241. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
5
Ethical concerns when recruiting children with cancer for research: Swedish healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences.招募癌症儿童参与研究时的伦理问题:瑞典医疗保健专业人员的看法和经验。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Mar 14;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00901-4.
6
'Do you feel well or unwell?' A study on children's experience of estimating their nausea using the digital tool PicPecc.“你感觉好还是不好?”一项关于儿童使用数字工具 PicPecc 估计恶心程度的体验的研究。
J Child Health Care. 2023 Dec;27(4):654-666. doi: 10.1177/13674935221089746. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
7
A Norm-Creative Method for Co-constructing Personas With Children With Disabilities: Multiphase Design Study.一种与残疾儿童共同构建人物角色的规范创新方法:多阶段设计研究。
J Particip Med. 2022 Jan 6;14(1):e29743. doi: 10.2196/29743.
8
A Qualitative Study: What Do Nurses in Charge in Emergency Departments Do?一项定性研究:急诊科护士长做什么?
Cureus. 2021 Sep 12;13(9):e17912. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17912. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Patient Participation in Nursing Care: Views From Ghanaian Nurses, Nursing Students, and Patients.患者参与护理:加纳护士、护生及患者的观点
SAGE Open Nurs. 2019 Oct 10;5:2377960819880761. doi: 10.1177/2377960819880761. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
10
Creating a communication space in the healthcare context: Children's perspective of using the eHealth service, Sisom.创建医疗保健环境中的交流空间:儿童使用 Sisom 电子健康服务的观点。
J Child Health Care. 2021 Mar;25(1):31-43. doi: 10.1177/1367493520904804. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
促进幼年特发性关节炎患儿参与医疗护理情境:一项扎根理论研究
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 May 10;11:30518. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30518. eCollection 2016.
4
Reframing the focus from a family-centred to a child-centred care approach for children's healthcare.将儿童医疗保健的重点从以家庭为中心的护理方法转变为以儿童为中心的护理方法。
J Child Health Care. 2016 Dec;20(4):494-502. doi: 10.1177/1367493516642744. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
5
Health professionals' perspectives on children's and young people's participation in health care: a qualitative multihospital study.医疗专业人员对儿童和青少年参与医疗保健的看法:一项多医院定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Apr;25(7-8):1035-44. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13152. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
The perspective of children on factors influencing their participation in perioperative care.儿童对影响其参与围手术期护理因素的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Oct;24(19-20):2945-53. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12911. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
7
Implementation science in healthcare: Introduction and perspective.医疗保健领域的实施科学:引言与展望。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(2):97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
8
Shared Decision Making in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.儿科中的共同决策:系统评价与荟萃分析
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Nov-Dec;15(6):573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 May 14.
9
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
10
Decision-making capacity of children and adolescents--suggestions for advancing the concept's implementation in pediatric healthcare.儿童和青少年的决策能力——推进该概念在儿科医疗保健中实施的建议。
Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Jun;174(6):775-82. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2462-8. Epub 2014 Nov 27.