Matsuura Ryo, Komaru Yohei, Miyamoto Yoshihisa, Yoshida Teruhiko, Yoshimoto Kohei, Isshiki Rei, Mayumi Kengo, Yamashita Tetsushi, Hamasaki Yoshifumi, Nangaku Masaomi, Noiri Eisei, Morimura Naoto, Doi Kent
Department of Nephrology and Endocrinology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Department of Dialysis and Apheresis, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Jan 17;8(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0355-0.
Furosemide responsiveness (FR) is determined by urine output after furosemide administration and has recently been evaluated as a furosemide stress test (FST) for predicting severe acute kidney injury (AKI) progression. Although a standardized furosemide dose is required for FST, variable dosing is typically employed based on illness severity, including renal dysfunction in the clinical setting. This study aimed to evaluate whether FR with different furosemide doses can predict AKI progression. We further evaluated the combination of an AKI biomarker, plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and FR for predicting AKI progression.
We retrospectively analyzed 95 patients who were treated with bolus furosemide in our medical-surgical intensive care unit. Patients who had already developed AKI stage 3 were excluded. A total of 18 patients developed AKI stage 3 within 1 week. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) values of FR and plasma NGAL were 0.87 (0.73-0.94) and 0.80 (0.67-0.88) for AKI progression, respectively. When plasma NGAL level was < 142 ng/mL, only one patient developed stage 3 AKI, indicating that plasma NGAL measurements were sufficient to predict AKI progression. We further evaluated the performance of FR in 51 patients with plasma NGAL levels > 142 ng/mL. FR was associated with AUC of 0.84 (0.67-0.94) for AKI progression in this population with high NGAL levels.
Although different variable doses of furosemide were administered, FR revealed favorable efficacy for predicting AKI progression even in patients with high plasma NGAL levels. This suggests that a combination of FR and biomarkers can stratify the risk of AKI progression in a clinical setting.
呋塞米反应性(FR)由给予呋塞米后的尿量决定,最近已被评估为一种用于预测严重急性肾损伤(AKI)进展的呋塞米应激试验(FST)。尽管FST需要标准化的呋塞米剂量,但在临床环境中,通常根据疾病严重程度(包括肾功能不全)采用可变剂量。本研究旨在评估不同呋塞米剂量的FR是否能预测AKI进展。我们还评估了AKI生物标志物血浆中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(NGAL)与FR联合用于预测AKI进展的情况。
我们回顾性分析了在我们的内科 - 外科重症监护病房接受大剂量呋塞米治疗的95例患者。已发展为AKI 3期的患者被排除。共有18例患者在1周内发展为AKI 3期。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,对于AKI进展,FR和血浆NGAL的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.87(0.73 - 0.94)和0.80(0.67 - 0.88)。当血浆NGAL水平<142 ng/mL时,只有1例患者发展为3期AKI,这表明血浆NGAL测量足以预测AKI进展。我们进一步评估了5,1例血浆NGAL水平>142 ng/mL患者中FR的性能。在这个高NGAL水平人群中,FR与AKI进展的AUC为0.84(0.67 - 0.94)相关。
尽管给予了不同的可变剂量呋塞米,但FR显示出即使在血浆NGAL水平高的患者中预测AKI进展的良好疗效。这表明FR和生物标志物的联合可以在临床环境中对AKI进展风险进行分层。