Asakura Shingo, Makingi George, Kazwala Rudovick, Makita Kohei
Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, School of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, 582 Bunkyodai Midorimachi, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, 069-8501, Japan.
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3021, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Ecohealth. 2018 Mar;15(1):41-51. doi: 10.1007/s10393-017-1308-z. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
Epidemiology of human and animal brucellosis may depend on ecological conditions. A cross-sectional study was conducted to compare prevalence and risk factors of bovine brucellosis, and risky behaviours for the human infection between urban and agro-pastoral areas in Morogoro region, Tanzania. Cattle blood sampling and interviews using a structured questionnaire were conducted with farmers. Rose-Bengal test was conducted for the cattle sera, and positive samples were confirmed with competitive ELISA. Farm-level sero-prevalences were 0.9% (1/106, 95% CI 0.0-5.9%) and 52.9% (9/17, 95% CI 28.5-76.1%) in urban and agro-pastoral areas, respectively. The animal-level-adjusted prevalences were 0.2% (1/667, 95% CI 0.0-1.1%) and 7.0% (28/673, 95% CI 5.7-8.4%) in those areas. The final farm-level model including both areas found two risk factors: history of abortion in the herd (P < 0.01) and cattle grazing (P = 0.07). The animal-level risk factors in agro-pastoral areas were age (P = 0.04) and history of abortion (P = 0.03). No agro-pastoral farmer knew about Brucella vaccine. Agro-pastoralists generally had poorer knowledge on brucellosis and practiced significantly more risky behaviours for human brucellosis such as drinking raw milk (17.6%, P < 0.01) and blood (35.3%, P < 0.01), and helping cattle birth (100%, P = 0.04) than urban farmers (0, 0 and 79.2%, respectively). Intervention programs through education including both human and animal health particularly targeting agro-pastoralists would be needed.
人类和动物布鲁氏菌病的流行病学可能取决于生态条件。在坦桑尼亚的莫罗戈罗地区,开展了一项横断面研究,以比较城市和农牧区牛布鲁氏菌病的患病率及风险因素,以及人类感染的危险行为。对养殖户进行了牛血样采集,并使用结构化问卷进行访谈。对牛血清进行了玫瑰红试验,阳性样本通过竞争酶联免疫吸附测定进行确认。城市和农牧区养殖场层面的血清阳性率分别为0.9%(1/106,95%置信区间0.0-5.9%)和52.9%(9/17,95%置信区间28.5-76.1%)。这些地区动物层面调整后的患病率分别为0.2%(1/667,95%置信区间0.0-1.1%)和7.0%(28/673,95%置信区间5.7-8.4%)。包含两个地区的最终养殖场层面模型发现了两个风险因素:畜群流产史(P<0.01)和牛放牧(P=0.07)。农牧区动物层面的风险因素是年龄(P=0.04)和流产史(P=0.03)。没有一位农牧区养殖户了解布鲁氏菌疫苗。农牧民对布鲁氏菌病的了解普遍较差,且在人类布鲁氏菌病方面实施的危险行为显著多于城市养殖户,如饮用生牛奶(17.6%,P<0.01)、饮用牛血(35.3%,P<0.01)以及协助母牛分娩(100%,P=0.04),而城市养殖户相应的比例分别为0、0和79.2%。需要开展包括人类和动物健康在内的教育干预项目,尤其针对农牧民。