From the Department of Anesthesiology (E.M.S.L., P.C.F., W.F.D., S.R., R.J.M., P.T.) and the Center for Healthcare Studies (P.T.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and the Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa (C.A.W.).
Anesthesiology. 2018 Apr;128(4):745-753. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002089.
Programmed intermittent boluses of local anesthetic have been shown to be superior to continuous infusions for maintenance of labor analgesia. High-rate epidural boluses increase delivery pressure at the catheter orifice and may improve drug distribution in the epidural space. We hypothesized that high-rate drug delivery would improve labor analgesia and reduce the requirement for provider-administered supplemental boluses for breakthrough pain.
Nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy at a cervical dilation of less than or equal to 5 cm at request for neuraxial analgesia were eligible for this superiority-design, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Neuraxial analgesia was initiated with intrathecal fentanyl 25 μg. The maintenance epidural solution was bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml with fentanyl 1.95 μg/ml. Programmed (every 60 min) intermittent boluses (10 ml) and patient controlled bolus (5 ml bolus, lockout interval: 10 min) were administered at a rate of 100 ml/h (low-rate) or 300 ml/h (high-rate). The primary outcome was percentage of patients requiring provider-administered supplemental bolus analgesia.
One hundred eight women were randomized to the low- and 102 to the high-rate group. Provider-administered supplemental bolus doses were requested by 44 of 108 (40.7%) in the low- and 37 of 102 (36.3%) in the high-rate group (difference -4.4%; 95% CI of the difference, -18.5 to 9.1%; P = 0.67). Patient requested/delivered epidural bolus ratio and the hourly bupivacaine consumption were not different between groups. No subject had an adverse event.
Labor analgesia quality, assessed by need for provider- and patient-administered supplemental analgesia and hourly bupivacaine consumption was not improved by high-rate epidural bolus administration.
与持续输注相比,间歇性推注局部麻醉药已被证明更有利于维持分娩镇痛。高流速硬膜外推注会增加导管口的输送压力,并且可能改善硬膜外腔的药物分布。我们假设高流速药物输送会改善分娩镇痛,并减少因突破性疼痛而需要给予的医护人员补充推注。
在请求脊神经镇痛时,初产妇的宫颈扩张小于或等于 5cm,符合本项优效性设计、双盲、随机对照试验的入选标准。蛛网膜下腔镇痛起始使用 25μg 芬太尼。维持硬膜外溶液为布比卡因 0.625mg/ml 加芬太尼 1.95μg/ml。间歇性推注(每 60 分钟一次,每次 10ml)和患者自控推注(5ml 推注,锁定间隔:10 分钟)均以 100ml/h(低流速)或 300ml/h(高流速)的速度给药。主要结局是需要医护人员给予补充推注镇痛的患者比例。
108 名女性被随机分配至低流速组,102 名女性被随机分配至高流速组。低流速组中,有 44 名(40.7%)患者需要医护人员给予补充推注镇痛,高流速组中,有 37 名(36.3%)患者需要医护人员给予补充推注镇痛(差异-4.4%;差值的 95%置信区间,-18.5 至 9.1%;P=0.67)。两组间患者要求/给予的硬膜外推注比例和每小时布比卡因消耗无差异。没有患者发生不良事件。
通过需要医护人员给予的补充镇痛和每小时布比卡因消耗评估的分娩镇痛质量,高流速硬膜外推注给药并未得到改善。