Gatzke-Kopp Lisa M, Ram Nilam, Lydon-Staley David M, DuPuis David
Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University.
German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlin.
J Behav Decis Mak. 2018 Jan;31(1):12-24. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2038. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
Many behavioral paradigms used to study individuals' decision making tendencies do not capture the decision components that contribute to behavioral outcomes, such as differentiating decisions driven toward a reward from decisions driven away from a cost. This study tested a novel decision making task in a sample of 403 children (age 9 years) enrolled in an ongoing longitudinal study. The task consisted of 3 blocks representing distinct cost domains (delay, probability, effort) wherein children were presented with a deck of cards, each of which consisted of a reward and a cost. Children elected whether to accept or skip the card at each trial. Reward-cost pairs were selected using an adaptive algorithm to strategically sample the decision space in the fewest number of trials. Using person-specific regression models, decision preferences were quantified for each cost domain with respect to general tolerance (intercept), as well as parameters estimating the effect of incremental increases in reward or cost on the probability of accepting a card. Results support the relative independence of decision making tendencies across cost domains, with moderate correlations observed between tolerance for delay and effort. Specific decision parameters showed unique associations with cognitive and behavioral measures including executive function, academic motivation, anxiety, and hyperactivity. Evidence indicates that sensitivity to reward is an important factor in incentivizing decisions to work harder or wait longer. Dissociating the relative contributions of reward and cost sensitivity in multiple domains may facilitate the identification of heterogeneity in sub-optimal decision making.
许多用于研究个体决策倾向的行为范式并未涵盖对行为结果有贡献的决策成分,比如区分趋向奖励的决策和规避成本的决策。本研究在一项正在进行的纵向研究中,对403名9岁儿童的样本测试了一种新颖的决策任务。该任务由代表不同成本领域(延迟、概率、努力)的3个模块组成,其中向儿童展示一副卡片,每张卡片都包含一个奖励和一个成本。在每次试验中,儿童选择是否接受或跳过这张卡片。奖励-成本对使用自适应算法进行选择,以便在最少的试验次数中对决策空间进行策略性抽样。使用针对个体的回归模型,针对每个成本领域,根据一般耐受性(截距)以及估计奖励或成本的增量增加对接受卡片概率的影响的参数,对决策偏好进行量化。结果支持了决策倾向在不同成本领域的相对独立性,在延迟耐受性和努力耐受性之间观察到中等程度的相关性。特定的决策参数显示出与认知和行为测量指标(包括执行功能、学业动机、焦虑和多动)的独特关联。有证据表明,对奖励的敏感性是激励人们更加努力工作或等待更长时间的决策中的一个重要因素。区分多个领域中奖励敏感性和成本敏感性的相对贡献,可能有助于识别次优决策中的异质性。