• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

131 个国家的模糊集定性比较分析:哪种结构条件的组合可以更好地解释健康状况?

A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 131 countries: which configuration of the structural conditions can explain health better?

机构信息

Department of Social Welfare, School of Education Sciences, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Social Welfare Management Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jan 22;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0724-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-018-0724-1
PMID:29357889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5778742/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to the recommendations of the World Health Organization Commission On Social Determinants of Health (CSDH) for intersectoral action on health, the well-being of and equity in health within a population are achieved via a complex fusion of policies and actions. In this study, following the CSDH's approach and considering set-theoretic relations, we aimed to unravel this complexity and answer the kinds of questions that are outside the scope of conventional variable-oriented approach.

METHODS

A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of 131 countries was conducted to examine the configurational effects of five macro-level structural conditions on life expectancy at birth. The potential causal conditions were level of country wealth, income inequality, quality of governance, education, and health system. The data collected from different international data sources were recorded during 2004-2015.

RESULTS

The intermediate solution of the truth table analysis indicated a configuration of conditions including high level of governance, education, wealth, and affluent health system to be consistently sufficient for high life expectancy. On the other hand, four configurations, each containing two or three conditions, were consistent with being usually sufficient to cause low life expectancy.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to configurationally explore the cases and specify the combinations of potentially causal conditions which were usually sufficient to explain high or low life expectancy in different countries. As a result, particular cases were identified for further research. In addition, research may provide support for the CSDH's recommendations emphasizing the importance of intersectoral action for health.

摘要

背景

根据世界卫生组织社会决定因素健康委员会(CSDH)关于跨部门卫生行动的建议,人口的健康福祉和公平可以通过政策和行动的复杂融合来实现。在这项研究中,我们遵循 CSDH 的方法,并考虑到集合理论关系,旨在揭示这种复杂性,并回答常规变量导向方法范围之外的问题。

方法

对 131 个国家进行模糊集定性比较分析,以检验五种宏观结构条件对出生时预期寿命的配置效应。潜在的因果条件是国家财富水平、收入不平等、治理质量、教育和卫生系统。从不同国际数据源收集的数据记录在 2004-2015 年期间。

结果

真值表分析的中间解表明,包括高水平治理、教育、财富和富裕的卫生系统在内的条件配置对于高预期寿命是一致充分的。另一方面,有四个配置,每个配置包含两个或三个条件,与导致低预期寿命的情况通常一致。

结论

我们能够配置性地探索案例,并指定通常足以解释不同国家高或低预期寿命的潜在因果条件的组合。因此,确定了特定案例进行进一步研究。此外,研究可以为 CSDH 的建议提供支持,强调跨部门行动对健康的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc6/5778742/bd3baa9bc573/12939_2018_724_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc6/5778742/201090d54a76/12939_2018_724_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc6/5778742/bd3baa9bc573/12939_2018_724_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc6/5778742/201090d54a76/12939_2018_724_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc6/5778742/bd3baa9bc573/12939_2018_724_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 131 countries: which configuration of the structural conditions can explain health better?131 个国家的模糊集定性比较分析:哪种结构条件的组合可以更好地解释健康状况?
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jan 22;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0724-1.
2
[The concept of social determinants of health in health promotion policies in Thailand, Sweden, England, USA, and Japan: A narrative review].[泰国、瑞典、英国、美国和日本健康促进政策中的健康社会决定因素概念:一项叙述性综述]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2022 May 24;69(5):338-356. doi: 10.11236/jph.21-105. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
3
Studying social determinants of health using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A worked example.使用模糊集定性比较分析研究健康的社会决定因素:一个实例研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;309:115241. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115241. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
4
Measuring health inequities in low and middle income countries for the development of observatories on inequities and social determinants of health.衡量低收入和中等收入国家的健康不平等状况,以建立健康不平等与社会决定因素观察站。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jan 19;15:9. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0297-9.
5
Poverty and inequality - but of what - as social determinants of health in Africa?贫困与不平等——但具体是何种贫困与不平等——作为非洲健康的社会决定因素?
Afr Health Sci. 2015 Dec;15(4):1330-8. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i4.36.
6
[Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. A challenge for the international community].[一代人之内消除差距:通过针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动实现健康公平。国际社会面临的一项挑战]
Ann Ig. 2008 Nov-Dec;20(6):595-601.
7
An analysis of the determinants of maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区孕产妇死亡率的决定因素分析。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Oct;13(8):926-38. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2004.13.926.
8
Wealth inequality and health: a political economy perspective.贫富差距与健康:政治经济学视角。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(3):403-24. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.3.c.
9
Impact of income inequality on life expectancy in a highly unequal developing country: the case of Brazil.收入不平等对高度不平等发展中国家预期寿命的影响:巴西案例。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Aug;67(8):661-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201426. Epub 2013 May 1.
10
Impact of macro-level socio-economic factors on rising suicide rates in South Korea: panel-data analysis in East Asia.宏观社会经济因素对韩国自杀率上升的影响:东亚地区的面板数据分析
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2014 Dec;17(4):151-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Fuzzy‑set qualitative comparative analysis and fuzzy cognitive maps: Exploring pregnancy outcomes and maternal depression.模糊集定性比较分析与模糊认知图:探究妊娠结局与产妇抑郁
Med Int (Lond). 2025 Mar 27;5(3):30. doi: 10.3892/mi.2025.229. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
2
Sociopolitical context and COVID-19 fatality rates in OECD countries: a configurational approach.经合组织国家的社会政治背景与 COVID-19 死亡率:一种组态方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):2400. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19594-4.
3
Configurational analysis of conditions influencing customers' channel switching intention in omnichannel retailing: a fuzzy-set analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Inequalities in Global Context.全球背景下的健康不平等
Am Behav Sci. 2013;57(8):1014-1039. doi: 10.1177/0002764213487343. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
2
Priorities for action on the social determinants of health: Empirical evidence on the strongest associations with life expectancy in 54 low-income countries, 1990-2012.健康社会决定因素的行动重点:1990 - 2012年54个低收入国家与预期寿命最强关联的实证证据
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;167:88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.035. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
3
Quality of governance, public spending on health and health status in Sub Saharan Africa: a panel data regression analysis.
全渠道零售中影响顾客渠道转换意愿的条件的组态分析:模糊集分析
Qual Quant. 2023 Mar 2:1-38. doi: 10.1007/s11135-023-01633-8.
4
Faultline configurations affecting the entrepreneurial team performance of new generation of returning migrant workers in China: An empirical study based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.影响中国新一代返乡农民工创业团队绩效的断层线构型:基于模糊集定性比较分析的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 12;13:918128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918128. eCollection 2022.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区的治理质量、卫生公共支出与健康状况:面板数据回归分析
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 21;15:932. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2287-z.
4
The health gap: the challenge of an unequal world.健康差距:不平等世界的挑战。
Lancet. 2015 Dec 12;386(10011):2442-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00150-6. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
5
Population health and status of epidemiology: WHO European Region I.人群健康与流行病学现况:世卫组织欧洲区域 I 部分。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;42(3):870-85. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt054.
6
WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide.世卫组织欧洲健康决定因素和卫生鸿沟审查。
Lancet. 2012 Sep 15;380(9846):1011-29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61228-8. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
7
Fair society, healthy lives.公平的社会,健康的生活。
Public Health. 2012 Sep;126 Suppl 1:S4-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
8
Multilevel survival analysis of health inequalities in life expectancy.多水平生存分析方法在预期寿命健康不平等研究中的应用。
Int J Equity Health. 2009 Aug 23;8:31. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-31.
9
Global variations in health: evaluating Wilkinson's income inequality hypothesis using the World Values Survey.全球健康差异:利用世界价值观调查评估威尔金森的收入不平等假说
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Feb;68(4):643-53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.026. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
10
Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.消除一代人之间的差距:通过针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动实现健康公平。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1661-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6.