Grégoire Eric, Roy Laurence, Buard Valérie, Delbos Martine, Durand Valérie, Martin-Bodiot Cécile, Voisin Pascale, Sorokine-Durm Irène, Vaurijoux Aurélie, Voisin Philippe, Baldeyron Céline, Barquinero Joan Francesc
a Laboratoire de Radiobiologie des expositions Accidentelles , Institut de Radioprotection et de Sureté Nucléaire (IRSN) , Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex , France.
b Institut Fédératif de Biologie , CHU Toulouse Purpan , Toulouse , France.
Int J Radiat Biol. 2018 Mar;94(3):248-258. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1427903. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
The fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique, which easily detects reciprocal translocations, is currently used to estimate doses in retrospective biological dosimetry, after suspected accidental overexposure to ionizing radiation (IR). This study of 42 cases aimed to verify the appropriateness of this assay for radiation dose reconstruction, compared to the dicentric assay, and to evaluate other limitations.
We labeled chromosomes 2, 4, and 12 by 3-color FISH painting to detect translocations on lymphocytes of patients with suspected past IR overexposure.
Translocation dose estimation showed doses significantly different from 0 Gy in 25 of the 42 cases. The lowest positive dose measured was 0.3 Gy. Several months after IR exposure, the doses measured by translocation and dicentric assays are quite similar. For a year, dose estimation by translocation assay becomes more relevant as dicentric frequency starts to decrease, coming close to 0 for more than a year after the exposure. The persistence of translocations enabled us to corroborate an overexposure 44 years earlier. Interpretation of the observed translocation yield requires the knowledge of the patient's other radiation exposures. A dose assessment by this biomarker is relevant only if the radiation exposure is confirmed.
This technique is appropriate for corroborating a former IR exposure of individuals. When the radiation dose is greater than 1 Gy, the translocations in complex exchanges must be considered. Another relevant point is the use of an appropriate background yield of translocations. The dose assessment, however, also depends on exposure to various genotoxic agents besides IR. If no evidence about the existence of radiation exposure is available, dose assessment is not useful. For this reason, report only the translocation frequency and its comparison with the background yield by age class is preferable.
荧光原位杂交(FISH)技术能够轻松检测相互易位,目前用于在怀疑意外过量暴露于电离辐射(IR)后进行回顾性生物剂量测定中的剂量估算。本研究纳入42例病例,旨在与双着丝粒测定法相比,验证该检测方法在辐射剂量重建中的适用性,并评估其他局限性。
我们通过三色FISH染色体涂染标记2号、4号和12号染色体,以检测疑似既往有IR过量暴露患者淋巴细胞上的易位情况。
易位剂量估算显示,42例病例中有25例的剂量与0 Gy有显著差异。测得的最低阳性剂量为0.3 Gy。IR暴露数月后,通过易位和双着丝粒测定法测得的剂量相当相似。在长达一年的时间里,随着双着丝粒频率开始下降,易位测定法的剂量估算变得更具相关性,在暴露一年多后双着丝粒频率接近0。易位的持续存在使我们能够证实44年前的一次过量暴露。对观察到的易位产率的解释需要了解患者的其他辐射暴露情况。只有在确认辐射暴露的情况下,通过这种生物标志物进行剂量评估才有意义。
该技术适用于证实个体既往的IR暴露。当辐射剂量大于1 Gy时,必须考虑复杂交换中的易位情况。另一个相关要点是使用适当的易位背景产率。然而,剂量评估还取决于除IR之外暴露于各种遗传毒性剂的情况。如果没有关于辐射暴露存在的证据,剂量评估就没有用处。因此,仅报告易位频率及其与按年龄组划分的背景产率的比较更为可取。