Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Mar 26;56(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01553-17. Print 2018 Apr.
infection (CDI) is not declining in the United States. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are used as part of active surveillance testing programs to prevent health care-associated infection. The objective of this study was to validate the cobas Cdiff Test on the cobas 4800 System (cobas) within a four-hospital system using prospectively collected perirectal swabs from asymptomatic patients at admission and during monthly intensive care unit (ICU) screening in an infection control CDI reduction program. Performance of the cobas was compared to that of toxigenic culture. Each positive cobas sample and the next following negative patient swab were cultured. The study design gave 273 samples processed by both cobas (137 positive and 136 negative) and culture (one negative swab was not cultured). Discrepant analysis was performed using a second NAAT, the Xpert Epi test (Xpert). This strategy was compared to a medical record review for antibiotic receipt that would inhibit growth of in colonic stool. None of the cobas-negative samples were culture positive. The cobas positive predictive value was 75.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.9% to 82%) and positive percent agreement was 100% (95% CI, 96.0% to 100%). Overall agreement between cobas and direct toxigenic culture was 87.6% (95% CI, 83.1% to 91%). For the cobas-positive/culture-negative (discrepant) samples, 7 Xpert-positive samples were from patients receiving inhibitory antimicrobials; only 4 of 23 Xpert-negative samples received these agents ( = 0.00006). Our results support use of the cobas as a reliable assay for an active surveillance testing program to detect asymptomatic carriers of toxigenic .
在美国,感染(CDI)并未减少。核酸扩增检测(NAAT)被用作主动监测检测计划的一部分,以预防医疗保健相关感染。本研究的目的是使用前瞻性收集的无症状患者的直肠拭子,在感染控制 CDI 减少计划中,在四所医院系统内对 cobas 4800 系统(cobas)上的 cobas Cdiff 测试进行验证,这些患者在入院时和每月进行重症监护病房(ICU)筛查时。将 cobas 的性能与产毒培养进行了比较。对每个阳性 cobas 样本和随后的阴性患者样本进行培养。研究设计共处理了 273 个样本,包括 cobas(137 个阳性和 136 个阴性)和培养(一个阴性拭子未培养)。使用第二种 NAAT(Xpert Epi 测试(Xpert))进行不一致性分析。该策略与抑制结肠粪便中 生长的抗生素使用的病历回顾进行了比较。没有 cobas 阴性样本培养阳性。cobas 的阳性预测值为 75.2%(95%置信区间[CI],66.9%至 82%),阳性百分比一致率为 100%(95%CI,96.0%至 100%)。cobas 和直接产毒培养之间的总体一致性为 87.6%(95%CI,83.1%至 91%)。对于 cobas 阳性/培养阴性(不一致)样本,7 个 Xpert 阳性样本来自接受抑制性抗菌药物的患者;仅 23 个 Xpert 阴性样本中有 4 个接受了这些药物( = 0.00006)。我们的结果支持使用 cobas 作为一种可靠的检测方法,用于主动监测检测计划,以检测产毒 的无症状携带者。