• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府无法承担 Codentify 来支持他们的追踪溯源解决方案。

Why governments cannot afford Codentify to support their track and trace solutions.

机构信息

Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Sovereign Border Solutions, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(6):706-708. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053970. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053970
PMID:29367343
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In anticipation of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products (ITP) entering into force in 2018, there is a growing demand for information on track and trace (T&T) solutions for tobacco products. This article contrasts the efficacy of Codentify from the perspective of authentication with that of material-based multilayered security technologies.

METHOD

To calculate the probability of detecting one fraudulent pack under Codentify, we relied on a modified Bernoulli trial experiment with independent repeated sampling without replenishment. The probability is calculated using a multinomial distribution formula adjusted for the fact that both legitimate and non-legitimate packs may be sold in the market.

RESULTS

In a relatively small market, a law enforcement authority would have to inspect over 27 000 (almost 31 000) packs per week to have a 90% (95%) certainty that it did not miss a fraudulent pack under the Codentify system. A material based T&T solution would require only 45 (59) pack inspections a week to have the same level of confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the inefficiency of Codentify compared to other solutions that incorporate material-based security features. Signatories to the ITP should reject Codentify due to both its low efficacy and its clear violation of the ITP's requirement that T&T shall not be performed by or delegated to the tobacco industry or its front groups.

摘要

背景

随着 2018 年《烟草制品非法贸易议定书》的生效,人们对烟草制品可追溯性解决方案的信息需求日益增长。本文从认证角度对比了 Codentify 与基于材料的多层安全技术的功效。

方法

为计算 Codentify 检测到一个假冒包装的概率,我们依赖于具有独立重复抽样而无补充的修正伯努利试验。使用调整后的多项分布公式进行计算,以考虑到合法和非合法包装都可能在市场上销售的事实。

结果

在一个相对较小的市场中,执法机构每周必须检查超过 27000(近 31000)个包装,才能有 90%(95%)的把握在 Codentify 系统下不会错过一个假冒包装。基于材料的 T&T 解决方案每周只需要进行 45(59)次包装检查就能达到相同的置信水平。

结论

本研究表明,Codentify 与其他纳入基于材料的安全功能的解决方案相比效率较低。《议定书》的签署方应拒绝 Codentify,因为它不仅功效低,而且明显违反了《议定书》的要求,即 T&T 不得由烟草业或其前团体执行或委托给它们执行。

相似文献

1
Why governments cannot afford Codentify to support their track and trace solutions.政府无法承担 Codentify 来支持他们的追踪溯源解决方案。
Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(6):706-708. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053970. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
2
Tobacco industry's elaborate attempts to control a global track and trace system and fundamentally undermine the Illicit Trade Protocol.烟草业精心企图控制全球追踪和溯源系统,并从根本上破坏《非法贸易议定书》。
Tob Control. 2019 Mar;28(2):127-140. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054191. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
3
Tracking and tracing the tobacco industry: potential tobacco industry influence over the EU's system for tobacco traceability and security features.追踪和追溯烟草业:烟草业对欧盟烟草可追溯性和安全功能系统的潜在影响。
Tob Control. 2020 Dec;29(e1):e56-e62. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055094. Epub 2019 Sep 22.
4
Is Illicit Cigarette Market a Threat to Tobacco Control in Ethiopia?非法卷烟市场对埃塞俄比亚的烟草控制构成威胁吗?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Jul 13;24(8):1228-1233. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac021.
5
Characteristics of illegal and legal cigarette packs sold in Guatemala.危地马拉销售的非法和合法香烟包装的特点。
Global Health. 2016 Nov 25;12(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0219-z.
6
From transit hub to major supplier of illicit cigarettes to Argentina and Brazil: the changing role of domestic production and transnational tobacco companies in Paraguay between 1960 and 2003.从交通枢纽到向阿根廷和巴西供应非法香烟的主要供应商:1960 年至 2003 年间,国内生产和跨国烟草公司在巴拉圭的角色变化。
Global Health. 2018 Nov 19;14(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0413-2.
7
Contrasting academic and tobacco industry estimates of illicit cigarette trade: evidence from Warsaw, Poland.对比学术和烟草业对非法香烟贸易的估计:来自波兰华沙的证据。
Tob Control. 2014 May;23(e1):e30-4. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051099. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
8
Opportunities and risks of the proposed FCTC protocol on illicit trade.拟议的《烟草控制框架公约》议定书在非法贸易方面的机遇与风险。
Tob Control. 2011 Nov;20(6):436-8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050122. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
9
Analysis of submissions to the EU's public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features.对欧盟烟草可追溯性和安全特征公开咨询提交材料的分析。
Tob Control. 2021 Nov;30(e1):e4-e9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-043875. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
10
Anti-tobacco control industry strategies in Turkey.土耳其的反控烟产业策略。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 26;18(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5071-z.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Investigation of Tobacco Industry Sourced Data Relating to Illicit Tobacco Trade Featured in Pakistan's Media Coverage (2015-2020).巴基斯坦媒体报道的烟草业来源数据与非法烟草贸易的系统调查(2015-2020 年)。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Oct 22;26(11):1489-1496. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae133.
2
Estimating the Size of Illicit Tobacco Market in Lithuania: Results from the Discarded Pack Collection Method.估算立陶宛非法烟草市场规模:废弃包装收集法的结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Jul 14;25(8):1431-1439. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad013.
3
Illicit trade in tobacco products: recent trends and coming challenges.
烟草制品非法贸易:最新趋势与未来挑战。
Tob Control. 2022 Mar;31(2):257-262. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056557.
4
Tracking and tracing the tobacco industry: potential tobacco industry influence over the EU's system for tobacco traceability and security features.追踪和追溯烟草业:烟草业对欧盟烟草可追溯性和安全功能系统的潜在影响。
Tob Control. 2020 Dec;29(e1):e56-e62. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055094. Epub 2019 Sep 22.
5
Tobacco industry's elaborate attempts to control a global track and trace system and fundamentally undermine the Illicit Trade Protocol.烟草业精心企图控制全球追踪和溯源系统,并从根本上破坏《非法贸易议定书》。
Tob Control. 2019 Mar;28(2):127-140. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054191. Epub 2018 Jun 13.