Department of Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via Francesco De Sanctis, 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty, Via di S. Gallicano 25/a, 00153, Rome, Italy.
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1551-4.
Electrodermal activity (EDA) and other peripheral autonomic electrical parameters have been used as indicators of emotional states, including depressive states and suicidal state. We aimed to review EDA research systematically, focusing on EDA's usefulness as a biomarker for depression and suicidal behaviour.
We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, following PRISMA guidelines. The initial screening of articles was based on titles and abstracts; then the full text was reviewed. A preliminary synthesis of findings was developed using tables, thematic analysis and quality ratings.
1287 articles were screened and 77 relevant studies were identified and included in the systematic review. The studies were fairly consistent in maintaining that hypoactive electrodermal response is an established feature of patients affected by depression. There is also preliminary evidence that monitoring EDA may help to differentiate the phases of mood disorders. A few studies provided evidence that EDA can be used to differentiate acutely suicidal subjects from depressed patients who are not severely suicidal. Although EDA has been shown to be a valid, sensitive marker of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and violent suicidal behaviour, it also seems to be influenced to some extent by antidepressant treatment.
Most of the studies summarised in this review are quite outdated and employed a variety of designs and methods to evaluate EDA. This limits the generalisability of the results and makes it difficult to draw clear conclusions about the role of EDA in real-world settings. Electrodermal hypoactivity seems to be a reliable feature of depression and a valid marker of suicidal risk. Nevertheless, the potential utility of EDA in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment planning for depression and suicidal behaviour, should be thoroughly studied.
皮肤电活动(EDA)和其他周围自主电参数已被用作情绪状态的指标,包括抑郁状态和自杀状态。我们旨在系统地回顾 EDA 研究,重点关注 EDA 作为抑郁和自杀行为生物标志物的有用性。
我们按照 PRISMA 指南搜索了 MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库。文章的初步筛选基于标题和摘要;然后审查全文。使用表格、主题分析和质量评级初步综合研究结果。
筛选出 1287 篇文章,确定了 77 篇相关研究,并将其纳入系统评价。这些研究在维持皮肤电反应减弱是受抑郁影响的患者的既定特征方面相当一致。也有初步证据表明,监测 EDA 可能有助于区分情绪障碍的阶段。一些研究提供的证据表明,EDA 可用于区分急性自杀者和没有严重自杀倾向的抑郁患者。尽管 EDA 已被证明是自杀意念、自杀企图和暴力自杀行为的有效、敏感标志物,但它似乎在某种程度上也受到抗抑郁治疗的影响。
本综述中总结的大多数研究都相当陈旧,采用了各种设计和方法来评估 EDA。这限制了结果的普遍性,使得难以就 EDA 在现实环境中的作用得出明确的结论。皮肤电反应减弱似乎是抑郁的可靠特征,也是自杀风险的有效标志物。然而,应深入研究 EDA 在抑郁和自杀行为的诊断、预防和治疗计划中的潜在效用。