College of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, HPNP 2320, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Harm Reduct J. 2018 Jan 25;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12954-018-0211-4.
Pharmacists' role in harm reduction is expanding in many states, yet there are limited data on pharmacists' willingness to participate in harm reduction activities. This study assessed community pharmacists' willingness to participate in one harm reduction initiative: syringe/needle exchange.
In 2015, all Kentucky pharmacists with active licenses were emailed a survey that examined attitudes towards participation in syringe/needle exchange. Response frequencies were calculated for community pharmacist respondents. Ordinal logistic regression estimated the impact of community pharmacist characteristics and attitudes on willingness to provide clean needles/syringes to people who inject drugs and to dispose of used syringes/needles, where both dependent variables were defined as Likert-type questions on a scale of 1 (not at all willing) to 6 (very willing).
Of 4699 practicing Kentucky pharmacists, 1282 pharmacists responded (response rate = 27.3%); the majority (n = 827) were community pharmacists. Community pharmacists were divided on willingness to provide clean needles/syringes, with 39.1% not willing (score 1 or 2 of 6) and 30% very willing (score 5 or 6 of 6). Few were willing to dispose of used needles/syringes, with only 18.7% willing. Community pharmacists who agreed that pharmacists could have significant public health impact by providing access to clean needles expressed 3.56 times more willingness to provide clean needles (95% CI 3.06-4.15), and 2.04 times more willingness to dispose of used needles (95% CI 1.77-2.35). Chain/supermarket pharmacists (n = 485, 58.6% of community pharmacies) were 39% less likely to express willingness to dispose of used needles (95% CI 0.43-0.87) when compared with independent community pharmacists (n = 342, 41.4% of community pharmacies). Independent pharmacists reported different barriers (workflow) than their chain/supermarket pharmacist colleagues (concerns of clientele).
Kentucky community pharmacists were more willing to provide clean needles than to dispose of used needles. Strategies to mitigate barriers to participation in syringe/needle exchange are warranted.
药剂师在减少伤害方面的作用正在许多州扩大,但关于药剂师参与减少伤害活动的意愿的数据有限。本研究评估了社区药剂师参与一项减少伤害举措的意愿:注射器/针头交换。
2015 年,向所有肯塔基州有有效执照的药剂师发送了一份电子邮件调查,调查了他们对参与注射器/针头交换的态度。对社区药剂师的应答者计算了应答频率。有序逻辑回归估计了社区药剂师特征和态度对向注射毒品者提供清洁针头/注射器和处理使用过的注射器/针头的意愿的影响,这两个因变量都被定义为李克特量表上的问题(1 表示非常不愿意,6 表示非常愿意)。
在 4699 名执业肯塔基州药剂师中,有 1282 名药剂师做出了回应(回应率为 27.3%);其中大多数(n=827)是社区药剂师。社区药剂师在提供清洁针头/注射器的意愿上存在分歧,39.1%的人不愿意(6 分制中的 1 或 2 分),30%的人非常愿意(6 分制中的 5 或 6 分)。很少有人愿意处理用过的针头/注射器,只有 18.7%的人愿意。同意药剂师通过提供清洁针头来实现重大公共卫生影响的社区药剂师,提供清洁针头的意愿高出 3.56 倍(95%CI 3.06-4.15),处理用过的针头的意愿高出 2.04 倍(95%CI 1.77-2.35)。连锁/超市药剂师(n=485,占社区药房的 58.6%)比独立社区药剂师(n=342,占社区药房的 41.4%)表示更不愿意处理用过的针头(95%CI 0.43-0.87)。独立药剂师报告了与连锁/超市药剂师同事不同的障碍(工作流程)。
肯塔基州社区药剂师更愿意提供清洁针头,而不是处理用过的针头。有必要制定策略来减轻参与注射器/针头交换的障碍。