O'Dolan Catriona, Grant Margaret, Lawrence Maggie, Dall Philippa
Institute for Applied Health Research, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 OBA UK.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jan 15;4:33. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0226-8. eCollection 2018.
Office workers have been identified as being at risk of accumulating high amounts of sedentary time in prolonged events during work hours, which has been associated with increased risk of a number of long-term health conditions.There is some evidence that providing advice to stand at regular intervals during the working day, and using computer-based prompts, can reduce sedentary behaviour in office workers. However, evidence of effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability for these types of intervention is currently limited.
A 2-arm, parallel group, cluster-randomised feasibility trial to assess the acceptability of prompts to break up sedentary behaviour was conducted with office workers in a commercial bank ( = 21). Participants were assigned to an education only group (EG) or prompt and education group (PG). Both groups received education on reducing and breaking up sitting at work, and the PG also received hourly prompts, delivered by Microsoft Outlook over 10 weeks, reminding them to stand. Objective measurements of sedentary behaviour were made using activPAL monitors worn at three time points: baseline, in the last 2 weeks of the intervention period and 12 weeks after the intervention. Focus groups were conducted to explore the acceptability of the intervention and the motivations and barriers to changing sedentary behaviour.
Randomly generated, customised prompts, delivered by Microsoft Outlook, with messages about breaking up sitting, proved to be a feasible and acceptable way of delivering prompts to office workers. Participants in both groups reduced their sitting, but changes were not maintained at follow-up. The education session seemed to increase outcome expectations of the benefits of changing sedentary behaviour and promote self-regulation of behaviour in some participants. However, low self-efficacy and a desire to conform to cultural norms were barriers to changing behaviour.
Prompts delivered by Microsoft Outlook were a feasible, low-cost way of prompting office workers to break up their sedentary behaviour, although further research is needed to determine whether this has an additional impact on sedentary behaviour, to education alone. The role of cultural norms, and promoting self-efficacy, should be considered in the design of future interventions.
This study was registered retrospectively as a clinical trial on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID no. NCT02609282) on 23 March 2015.
办公室职员被认为在工作时长时间处于久坐状态,这与多种长期健康问题风险增加有关。有证据表明,建议在工作日定期站立,并使用基于计算机的提示,可以减少办公室职员的久坐行为。然而,这类干预措施的有效性、可行性和可接受性目前证据有限。
对一家商业银行的办公室职员开展了一项双臂、平行组、整群随机可行性试验,以评估打破久坐行为提示的可接受性(n = 21)。参与者被分配到仅接受教育组(EG)或提示加教育组(PG)。两组均接受了关于减少和打破工作时久坐的教育,PG组还在10周内通过Microsoft Outlook每小时收到一次提示,提醒他们站立。使用activPAL监测仪在三个时间点对久坐行为进行客观测量:基线、干预期的最后2周和干预后12周。开展焦点小组讨论以探讨干预措施的可接受性以及改变久坐行为的动机和障碍。
由Microsoft Outlook发送的随机生成的定制提示,以及关于打破久坐的信息,被证明是向办公室职员发送提示的一种可行且可接受的方式。两组参与者的久坐时间均有所减少,但随访时未保持这一变化。教育课程似乎提高了一些参与者对改变久坐行为益处的结果期望,并促进了行为的自我调节。然而,自我效能感低以及想要符合文化规范是行为改变的障碍。
Microsoft Outlook发送的提示是促使办公室职员打破久坐行为的一种可行、低成本的方式,不过还需要进一步研究来确定这是否对久坐行为有额外影响,还是仅对教育有影响。在未来干预措施的设计中应考虑文化规范的作用以及提高自我效能感。
本研究于2015年3月23日在ClinicalTrials.gov上作为一项临床试验进行了回顾性注册(标识符:NCT02609282)。