• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Factors influencing reducing sedentary time in home office employees.影响居家办公员工减少久坐时间的因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 6;15(1):24147. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08831-4.
2
"I Wish They'd Just Let Us Be." Experiences of Indian Autistic Individuals Around Stimming Behaviors at the Workplace.“我希望他们能让我们顺其自然。”印度自闭症患者在工作场所围绕自我刺激行为的经历。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):474-484. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0096. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Autistic Students' Experiences of Employment and Employability Support while Studying at a UK University.自闭症学生在英国大学学习期间的就业经历及就业支持情况
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):212-222. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0112. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
Are we working (too) comfortably?: the systematic development of an intervention to support workers to move more while working at home.我们工作得(太)舒适了吗?:一项支持员工在家工作时增加运动量的干预措施的系统开发。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jun 23;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01762-3.
9
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Breaking the chain from the chair: a manager's perspective on reducing employees sedentary time in a home-office context.打破久坐的链条:管理者对减少居家办公员工久坐时间的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):1079. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22184-7.
2
Participatory Approaches in the Context of Research Into Workplace Health Promotion to Improve Physical Activity Levels and Reduce Sedentary Behavior Among Office-Based Workers: Scoping Review.参与式方法在工作场所健康促进研究中的应用,以提高办公室工作人员的身体活动水平和减少久坐行为:范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jun 19;10:e50195. doi: 10.2196/50195.
3
"Are we working (too) comfortably?": a focus group study to understand sedentary behaviour when working at home and identify intervention strategies.“我们工作(得)太舒服了吗?”:一项理解在家工作时久坐行为并确定干预策略的焦点小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):1516. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18892-1.
4
Effectiveness of workplace interventions with digital elements to reduce sedentary behaviours in office employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis.工作场所中具有数字元素的干预措施对减少办公室员工久坐行为的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 19;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01595-6.
5
Hybrid office work in women and men: do directly measured physical behaviors differ between days working from home and days working at the office?女性和男性的混合办公模式:在家办公日和在办公室办公日的直接测量身体行为有差异吗?
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Nov 28;67(9):1043-1055. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad057.
6
A scoping review of methodologies for applying artificial intelligence to physical activity interventions.应用人工智能于体力活动干预措施的方法学的范围综述。
J Sport Health Sci. 2024 May;13(3):428-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
7
The Effect of Sitting Duration on Peripheral Blood Pressure Responses to Prolonged Sitting, With and Without Interruption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.久坐时长对长时间持续久坐(有无间断)时外周血压反应的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med. 2024 Jan;54(1):169-183. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01915-z. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
8
Effectiveness of Multicomponent Interventions in Office-Based Workers to Mitigate Occupational Sedentary Behavior: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于办公室工作人员的多组分干预措施在减轻职业久坐行为方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jul 26;9:e44745. doi: 10.2196/44745.
9
Home office shift and sedentary behaviour in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic: descriptives and related socioecological correlates.德国 COVID-19 大流行期间的家庭办公轮班和久坐行为:描述性分析及相关社会生态学相关性。
Ergonomics. 2024 Jan;67(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2202841. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
10
Multi-Component Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Japanese Office Workers: A Single-Arm Feasibility Study.多组分干预促进日本上班族身体活动:单臂可行性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24):16859. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416859.

影响居家办公员工减少久坐时间的因素。

Factors influencing reducing sedentary time in home office employees.

作者信息

Coffey Alan, Parés-Salomón Iris, Bort-Roig Judit, Proper Karin I, Walsh Deirdre, Reckman Päivi, Vaqué-Crusellas Cristina, Señé-Mir Anna M, Puig-Ribera Anna M, Dowd Kieran P

机构信息

SHE Research Group, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technological University of the Shannon, Dublin Road, Athlone, Co. Westmeath, Ireland.

Sports and Physical Activity Research Group, Institute for Research and Innovation in Life and Health Sciences in Central Catalonia (Iris-CC) and University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Vic (UVic-UCC), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 6;15(1):24147. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08831-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-08831-4
PMID:40619477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12230110/
Abstract

Evidence suggests that working from home increases the sedentary behaviours of desk-based workers, which may have deleterious health consequences. Owing to the unique nature of working from home, it is important to understand employees' perspectives on the factors influencing their ability to reduce their sedentary behaviours. This qualitative study employed semi-structured focus groups and interviews with desk-based employees to investigate perspectives on the factors influencing their ability to reduce their sedentary behaviours in a home-office context. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Employees want the autonomy to choose when and how they reduce their sedentary behaviours. They want organisations to support them and incorporate a social element into interventions. Employees do not feel trusted whilst working from home, which creates a reluctancy to leave their desk. There is a need for education on the negative health outcomes associated with high levels of sedentary behaviours, while employees want to be held accountable for changing their behaviour and for their efforts in reducing their sedentary behaviours to be rewarded. These results highlight the need for multi-component interventions to reduce sitting in the home-office context. Organisations should provide employees autonomy over how they reduce their siting time and work to reduce the stigma of working from home. Interventions must also educate staff on the health consequences associated with higher levels of sedentary time.

摘要

有证据表明,在家工作会增加伏案工作者的久坐行为,这可能会对健康产生有害影响。由于在家工作的独特性质,了解员工对影响其减少久坐行为能力的因素的看法很重要。这项定性研究采用了半结构化焦点小组和对伏案工作员工的访谈,以调查在家庭办公环境中影响他们减少久坐行为能力的因素的看法。采用反思性主题分析来分析数据。员工希望有自主权来选择何时以及如何减少久坐行为。他们希望组织支持他们,并将社交元素纳入干预措施中。员工在家工作时感觉不被信任,这导致他们不愿意离开办公桌。需要对与久坐行为水平高相关的负面健康结果进行教育,同时员工希望为改变行为负责,并因减少久坐行为的努力而得到奖励。这些结果凸显了在家庭办公环境中采取多成分干预措施以减少久坐的必要性。组织应赋予员工自主权,让他们自行决定如何减少久坐时间,并努力减少在家工作的污名化。干预措施还必须向员工宣传与久坐时间较长相关的健康后果。