Suppr超能文献

德国版库亚拉评分在髌股关节不稳患者中的验证:一项前瞻性多中心研究。

Validation of the German version of the Kujala score in patients with patellofemoral instability: a prospective multi-centre study.

作者信息

Dammerer D, Liebensteiner M C, Kujala U M, Emmanuel K, Kopf S, Dirisamer F, Giesinger J M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Liikunta Building, P.O. Box 35 (L), FI 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Apr;138(4):527-535. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2881-5. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Kujala score is the most frequently used questionnaire for patellofemoral disorders like pain, instability or osteoarthritis. Unfortunately, we are not aware of a validated German version of the Kujala score. The aim of our study was the translation and linguistic validation of the Kujala score in German-speaking patients with patella instability and the assessment of its measurement characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The German Kujala score was developed in several steps of translation. In addition to healthy controls, the Kujala German was assessed in consecutive patients undergoing reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent patellar dislocations. Pre-op, 6 and 12 months postop the patients completed the Kujala German score, the KOOS, the Lysholm score, a VAS Pain, and the SF-12v2 scores. In addition, there was a Kujala German Score retest preop after a 1-week interval.

RESULTS

We found high reliability in terms of internal consistency for the Kujala score (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87). Convergent validity with the KOOS (symptom r = 0.65, pain r = 0.78, ADL r = 0.74, sports/recreation r = 0.84, quality of life r = 0.70), the Lysholm score (r = 0.88) and the SF-12 physical component summary score (r = 0.79) and VAS pain (r = - 0.71) was also very high. Discriminant validity in terms of correlation with the SF-12 mental component summary Score was satisfactory (r = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the German version of the Kujala score proved to be a reliable and valid instrument in the setting of a typical patellofemoral disease treated with a standard patellofemoral procedure.

摘要

引言

库亚拉评分是用于评估髌股关节疾病(如疼痛、不稳定或骨关节炎)最常用的问卷。遗憾的是,我们尚未知晓经过验证的德语版库亚拉评分。本研究的目的是对德语版库亚拉评分进行翻译和语言验证,并评估其在德语区髌骨不稳定患者中的测量特征。

材料与方法

德语版库亚拉评分通过多个翻译步骤制定。除健康对照者外,对因复发性髌骨脱位接受内侧髌股韧带重建的连续患者进行德语版库亚拉评分评估。术前、术后6个月和12个月,患者完成德语版库亚拉评分、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)、莱肖尔姆评分、视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS疼痛)以及简短健康调查简表-12(SF-12v2)评分。此外,在术前间隔1周后进行德语版库亚拉评分重测。

结果

我们发现库亚拉评分在内部一致性方面具有较高的可靠性(Cronbach's α = 0.87)。与KOOS(症状r = 0.65,疼痛r = 0.78,日常生活活动r = 0.74,运动/娱乐r = 0.84,生活质量r = 0.70)、莱肖尔姆评分(r = 0.88)、SF-12身体成分汇总评分(r = 0.79)和VAS疼痛(r = -0.71)的收敛效度也非常高。与SF-12心理成分汇总评分的相关性方面的区分效度令人满意(r = 0.14)。

结论

总之,在采用标准髌股手术治疗的典型髌股疾病背景下,德语版库亚拉评分被证明是一种可靠且有效的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80b8/5854722/702470436159/402_2018_2881_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验