Moore Lorna G
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora CO (formerly of the Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver CO).
Quat Int. 2017 Dec 15;461:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.09.045. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
The question of whether human populations have adapted genetically to high altitude has been of interest since studies began there in the early 1900s. Initially there was debate as to whether genetic adaptation to high altitude has taken place based, in part, on disciplinary orientation and the sources of evidence being considered. Studies centered on short-term responses, termed acclimatization, and the developmental changes occurring across lifetimes. A paradigm shift occurred with the advent of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) technologies and statistical methods for detecting evidence of natural selection, resulting in an exponential rise in the number of publications reporting genetic adaptation. Reviewed here are the various kinds of evidence by which adaptation to high altitude has been assessed and which have led to widespread acceptance of the idea that genetic adaptation to high altitude has occurred. While methodological and other challenges remain for determining the specific gene or genes involved and the physiological mechanisms by which they are exerting their effects, considerable progress has been realized as shown by recent studies in Tibetans, Andeans and Ethiopians. Further advances are anticipated with the advent of new statistical methods, whole-genome sequencing and other molecular techniques for finer-scale genetic mapping, and greater intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary collaboration to identify the functional consequences of the genes or gene regions implicated and the time scales involved.
自20世纪初在高海拔地区开展研究以来,人类群体是否在基因上适应了高海拔这一问题一直备受关注。最初,关于是否发生了对高海拔的基因适应存在争议,部分原因在于学科导向以及所考虑的证据来源。研究集中在被称为适应的短期反应以及一生中发生的发育变化上。随着单核苷酸多态性(SNP)技术和用于检测自然选择证据的统计方法的出现,出现了范式转变,导致报告基因适应的出版物数量呈指数级增长。本文回顾了用于评估对高海拔适应的各种证据,这些证据使得高海拔基因适应这一观点得到了广泛认可。虽然在确定具体涉及的一个或多个基因以及它们发挥作用的生理机制方面,方法学和其他挑战仍然存在,但正如最近对藏族、安第斯人和埃塞俄比亚人的研究所表明的,已经取得了相当大的进展。随着新的统计方法、全基因组测序以及其他用于更精细基因定位的分子技术的出现,以及为确定所涉及基因或基因区域的功能后果和所涉及的时间尺度而开展的更多学科内和跨学科合作,预计将会取得进一步进展。