Discipline of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Int Endod J. 2018 Aug;51(8):847-861. doi: 10.1111/iej.12898. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
The aim of this systematic review was to address the question: Do different irrigating protocols have an impact on the dislocation resistance of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based materials? The review was performed using a well-defined search strategy in three databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) to include laboratory studies performed between January 1995 and May 2017, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers analysed the papers, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data on teeth used, sample size, size of root canal preparation, type of MTA-based material, irrigants, canal filling method, storage method and duration, region of roots and the parameters of push-out testing (slice thickness, plunger dimensions and plunger loading direction), the main results and dislocation resistance values (in MPa). From 255 studies, 27 were included for full-text analysis. Eight papers that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review. There was a wide variation in dislocation resistance due to differences in irrigation sequence, time and concentration of irrigants, storage method and duration, and the parameters of push-out bond strength testing. A meta-analysis was not done but qualitative synthesis of the included studies was performed. No definitive conclusion could be drawn to evaluate the effect of irrigation protocols on dislocation resistance of MTA-based materials. Recommendations have been provided for standardized testing methods and reporting of future studies, so as to obtain clinically relevant information and to understand the effects of irrigating protocols on root canal sealers and their interactions with the dentine walls of root canals.
不同的冲洗方案是否会影响基于矿化三氧化物凝聚体(MTA)的材料的抗脱位性能?本研究按照 PRISMA 指南,使用明确的搜索策略在三个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science)中进行了检索,纳入了 1995 年 1 月至 2017 年 5 月期间进行的实验室研究。两位评审员分析了这些论文,评估了偏倚风险,并提取了有关牙齿使用情况、样本量、根管预备大小、基于 MTA 的材料类型、冲洗剂、根管填充方法、储存方法和时间、牙根区域以及推出试验参数(切片厚度、柱塞尺寸和柱塞加载方向)、主要结果和抗脱位阻力值(以 MPa 计)的数据。在 255 项研究中,有 27 项进行了全文分析。27 项研究中有 8 项符合纳入标准,被纳入本综述。由于冲洗顺序、冲洗时间和冲洗剂浓度、储存方法和时间以及推出粘结强度试验参数的差异,抗脱位阻力存在很大差异。没有进行荟萃分析,但对纳入的研究进行了定性综合。不能得出明确的结论来评估冲洗方案对基于 MTA 的材料抗脱位性能的影响。为了获得临床相关信息,并了解冲洗方案对根管封闭剂的影响及其与根管牙本质壁的相互作用,为标准化测试方法和未来研究的报告提供了建议。