Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu-city, Shiga, JAPAN.
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Jun;50(6):1177-1185. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001567.
Aerobic training (AT) and high-intensity intermittent training (HIIT) reduce arterial stiffness, whereas resistance training (RT) induces deterioration of or no change in arterial stiffness. However, the molecular mechanism of these effects of different exercise modes remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the difference of different exercise effects on endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) signaling pathway and arterial stiffness in rats and humans.
In the animal study, forty 10-wk-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups: sedentary control (CON), AT (treadmill running, 60 min at 30 m·min, 5 d·wk for 8 wk), RT (ladder climbing, 8-10 sets per day, 3 d·wk for 8 wk), and HIIT (14 repeats of 20-s swimming session with 10-s pause between sessions, 4 d·wk for 6 wk from 12-wk-old) groups (n = 10 in each group). In the human study, we confirmed the effects of 6-wk HIIT and 8-wk AT interventions on central arterial stiffness and plasma nitrite/nitrate level in untrained healthy young men in randomized controlled trial (HIIT, AT, and CON; n = 7 in each group).
In the animal study, the effect on aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), as an index of central arterial stiffness, after HIIT was the same as the decrease in aortic PWV and increase in arterial eNOS/Akt phosphorylation after AT, which was not changed by RT. A negative correlation between aortic PWV and eNOS phosphorylation was observed (r = -0.38, P < 0.05). In the human study, HIIT- and AT-induced changes in carotid-femoral PWV (HIIT -115.3 ± 63.4 and AT -157.7 ± 45.7 vs CON 71.3 ± 61.1 m·s, each P < 0.05) decreased, and plasma nitrite/nitrate level increased compared with those in CON.
HIIT may reduce central arterial stiffness via the increase in aortic nitric oxide bioavailability despite it being done in a short time and short term and has the same effects as AT.
有氧运动(AT)和高强度间歇训练(HIIT)可降低动脉僵硬度,而抗阻训练(RT)可导致动脉僵硬度恶化或无变化。然而,不同运动方式的这些效果的分子机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在阐明不同运动方式对大鼠和人体内皮型一氧化氮合酶(eNOS)信号通路和动脉僵硬度的影响的差异。
在动物研究中,将 40 只 10 周龄雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠随机分为 4 组:安静对照组(CON)、AT 组(跑步机跑步,速度 30 m·min,每周 5 天,共 8 周)、RT 组(爬梯,每天 8-10 组,每周 3 天,共 8 周)和 HIIT 组(12 周龄时,每周 4 天,进行 14 次 20 秒游泳训练,每次训练之间休息 10 秒)(每组 10 只)。在随机对照试验中,我们确认了 6 周 HIIT 和 8 周 AT 干预对未经训练的健康年轻男性的中心动脉僵硬度和血浆硝酸盐/亚硝酸盐水平的影响(HIIT、AT 和 CON;每组 7 只)。
在动物研究中,HIIT 对主动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)的影响(作为中心动脉僵硬度的指标)与 AT 降低主动脉 PWV 和增加动脉 eNOS/Akt 磷酸化的效果相同,而 RT 则没有改变。主动脉 PWV 与 eNOS 磷酸化呈负相关(r = -0.38,P < 0.05)。在人体研究中,与 CON 相比,HIIT 和 AT 引起的颈动脉-股动脉 PWV 变化(HIIT -115.3 ± 63.4 和 AT -157.7 ± 45.7 vs CON 71.3 ± 61.1 m·s,均 P < 0.05)降低,血浆硝酸盐/亚硝酸盐水平升高。
尽管 HIIT 是在短时间和短期进行的,但它可以通过增加主动脉一氧化氮生物利用度来降低中心动脉僵硬度,其效果与 AT 相同。