Macromolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 13;115(7):1439-1444. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720139115. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
Since the 1920s, packing arguments have been used to rationalize crystal structures in systems ranging from atomic mixtures to colloidal crystals. Packing arguments have recently been applied to complex nanoparticle structures, where they often, but not always, work. We examine when, if ever, packing is a causal mechanism in hard particle approximations of colloidal crystals. We investigate three crystal structures composed of their ideal packing shapes. We show that, contrary to expectations, the ordering mechanism cannot be packing, even when the thermodynamically self-assembled structure is the same as that of the densest packing. We also show that the best particle shapes for hard particle colloidal crystals at any finite pressure are imperfect versions of the ideal packing shape.
自 20 世纪 20 年代以来,堆积论证一直被用于合理化从原子混合物到胶体晶体的系统中的晶体结构。堆积论证最近已被应用于复杂的纳米粒子结构,在这些结构中,堆积论证经常(但并非总是)有效。我们研究了在胶体晶体的硬粒子近似中,堆积是否曾经是一种因果机制。我们研究了由理想堆积形状组成的三种晶体结构。我们表明,与预期相反,即使在热力学自组装结构与最密堆积结构相同时,堆积也不能成为有序机制。我们还表明,在任何有限压力下,硬粒子胶体晶体的最佳粒子形状都是理想堆积形状的不完美版本。