Duffy S A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Apr;12(2):208-19. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.12.2.208.
Three experiments examined the role of causal expectations in sentence integration. Subjects read narratives that did or did not elicit strong expectations about upcoming events (high-expectation vs. low-expectation texts). Subjects were faster to judge a target sentence to be unrelated when it followed a high-expectation text than when it followed a low-expectation text. Subjects were slower to read an unimportant, expectation-violating sentence embedded in a high-expectation text. Subjects were faster both to read and to judge an expectation-fulfilling target sentence when it followed a high-expectation text. Three models of the generation and use of expectations are considered. The results support a model in which expectations are generated selectively. Once generated, expectations become the focus of upcoming sentence integration processes such that correct expectations help and incorrect expectations interfere. A third experiment found no evidence that expectations took the form of highly specific predictions.
三项实验研究了因果预期在句子整合中的作用。受试者阅读能或不能引发对即将发生事件强烈预期的叙事文本(高预期文本与低预期文本)。当目标句子出现在高预期文本之后时,受试者判断其不相关的速度比出现在低预期文本之后时更快。在高预期文本中嵌入一个无关紧要、违背预期的句子时,受试者阅读速度会变慢。当预期实现的目标句子出现在高预期文本之后时,受试者阅读和判断的速度都更快。文中考虑了三种预期生成和使用的模型。结果支持了一种模型,即预期是选择性生成的。一旦生成,预期就会成为后续句子整合过程的焦点,正确的预期有帮助,错误的预期则会产生干扰。第三个实验没有发现证据表明预期采取高度具体预测的形式。