• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[创新基金申请专家咨询委员会审议情况]

[Deliberations of the expert advisory council on innovation fund applications].

作者信息

Blettner Maria, Dierks Marie-Luise, Donner-Banzhoff Norbert, Hertrampf Katrin, Klusen Norbert, Köpke Sascha, Masanneck Michael, Pfaff Holger, Richter Rainer, Sundmacher Leonie

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik der Universitätsmedizin Mainz an der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.

Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; Leiterin der Patientenuniversität an der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Feb;130:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2018.01.004
PMID:29395802
Abstract

The "Innovation Fund" provides incentives for the development and testing of healthcare innovations in the area of the statutory health insurance with the aim to improve the quality of care in Germany. Over a period of initially four years (2016-19), 300 million Euro will be allocated annually to projects on "innovative forms of healthcare provision" and "health services research". Using a formalized procedure, the ten-member expert advisory board appointed by the German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) assess all applications on the basis of various criteria for scientific quality, potential of innovation, relevance for health service delivery, and implementability. The present discussion paper sets out important considerations for submission and assessment and puts them up for discussion. (As supplied by the authors).

摘要

“创新基金”为法定医疗保险领域的医疗创新研发与测试提供激励措施,旨在提高德国的医疗服务质量。在最初四年(2016 - 2019年)期间,每年将拨款3亿欧元用于“创新医疗服务形式”和“卫生服务研究”项目。由德国联邦卫生部(BMG)任命的十名成员组成的专家咨询委员会,采用正式程序,根据科学质量、创新潜力、对医疗服务提供的相关性和可实施性等各种标准评估所有申请。本讨论文件阐述了提交和评估的重要考量因素并供大家讨论。(由作者提供)

相似文献

1
[Deliberations of the expert advisory council on innovation fund applications].[创新基金申请专家咨询委员会审议情况]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Feb;130:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
The German health care Innovation Fund - An incentive for innovations to promote the integration of health care.德国医疗保健创新基金——激励创新以促进医疗保健整合。
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Oct 14;34(8):915-923. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-05-2020-0180.
3
[Does the Innovation Fund Improve Healthcare Provision? A Critical Assessment of the Status of Implementing Successful Innovation Fund Projects into Healthcare Practice].创新基金是否改善了医疗服务?对将成功的创新基金项目应用于医疗实践的现状进行批判性评估
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Jun;86(6):451-462. doi: 10.1055/a-2270-3537. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
4
Experiences with Innovation Fund healthcare models in primary care: a qualitative study amongst German general practitioners.创新基金医疗模式在初级保健中的应用经验:德国全科医生的定性研究。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2024 Mar;174(3-4):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s10354-022-00935-0. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
[Morbidity and healthcare differences between insured in the statutory ("GKV") and private health insurance ("PKV") in Germany. Review of empirical studies].[德国法定医疗保险(“GKV”)和私人医疗保险(“PKV”)参保者之间的发病率及医疗差异。实证研究综述]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):925-38. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1119-7.
6
Policy as a strategy to innovate in health care? A content analysis of innovation policies in Germany, 1994-2017.政策作为医疗创新的策略?1994-2017 年德国创新政策的内容分析。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 Nov;38(6):1657-1675. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3692. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
7
[Health services research--from the Health Research Council's perspective].[从健康研究委员会的视角看卫生服务研究]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(8):593-6.
8
[ENT expert assessment for federal health insurance in North Rhine. A contribution to the internal discussion of quantitative and qualitative optimization of the expert witness process].[北莱茵联邦医疗保险的耳鼻喉科专家评估。对专家证人程序定量和定性优化内部讨论的一项贡献]
Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Apr;61(4):179-84.
9
Financing health promotion, prevention and innovation despite the rising healthcare costs: How can the new German government square the circle?尽管医疗保健成本不断上升,但仍要为健康促进、预防和创新提供资金:新的德国政府如何能两全其美?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Apr;177:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.10.001. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
10
The healthcare system and the provision of oral healthcare in European Union member states. Part 1: Germany.欧盟成员国的医疗保健系统与口腔医疗保健服务。第1部分:德国。
Br Dent J. 2015 Feb;218(4):239-44. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.95.

引用本文的文献

1
Introducing and utilizing innovative technologies in health care systems: a country comparison for peripheral drug-eluting stents in Germany and the USA.在医疗保健系统中引入和应用创新技术:德国和美国外周药物洗脱支架的国别比较
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 19;13:1488091. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1488091. eCollection 2025.
2
Process evaluation of technologically assisted senior care using mixed methods: Results of the virtual assisted living (VAL, German: VBW Virtuell Betreutes Wohnen) project.采用混合方法对技术辅助老年护理进行过程评估:虚拟辅助生活(VAL,德语:VBW Virtuell Betreutes Wohnen)项目的结果。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 13;11:20552076241308445. doi: 10.1177/20552076241308445. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
How does an intervention work?-English Version : Development of an effect model for a complex intervention to prevent recurring or persistent pain using the example of PAIN 2.0.
一项干预措施是如何起作用的?-英文版:以PAIN 2.0为例,为预防复发性或持续性疼痛的复杂干预措施建立效果模型。
Schmerz. 2025 Jan 21. doi: 10.1007/s00482-024-00860-8.
4
[How does an intervention work?-German Version. : Development of an effect model for a complex intervention to prevent recurring or persistent pain using the example of PAIN 2.0].[干预如何起作用?-德文版。:以PAIN 2.0为例,开发一种用于预防复发性或持续性疼痛的复杂干预措施的效果模型]
Schmerz. 2025 Feb;39(1):23-34. doi: 10.1007/s00482-024-00854-6. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
5
Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trial.德国一所大学医学中心实施全院共享决策对患者的影响:一项前后试验。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):87-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462.
6
[Mixed Methods Studies in Health Services Research: Requirements, Challenges and the Question of Integration - a Discussion Paper from the Perspective of Qualitative Researchers].[卫生服务研究中的混合方法研究:要求、挑战与整合问题——一份来自定性研究人员视角的讨论文件]
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Aug;85(8-09):741-749. doi: 10.1055/a-2022-8326. Epub 2023 May 30.
7
Spanning the boundaries between policy, politics and science to solve wicked problems: policy pilots, deliberation fora and policy labs.跨越政策、政治和科学之间的界限以解决棘手问题:政策试点、审议论坛和政策实验室。
Sustain Sci. 2023;18(2):809-821. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01187-y. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
8
[Prevention of chronic pain in the German healthcare system : Current state and perspective].[德国医疗体系中慢性疼痛的预防:现状与展望]
Schmerz. 2021 Feb;35(1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s00482-020-00527-0. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
[Educational Programmes in Health Services Research in Germany: Current State and Future Perspectives].[德国卫生服务研究教育项目:现状与未来展望]
Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Mar;84(3):227-241. doi: 10.1055/a-1276-0686. Epub 2020 Dec 10.