Blackshear Joseph L, Safford Robert E, Thomas Colleen S, Bos J Martijn, Ackerman Michael J, Geske Jeffrey B, Ommen Steve R, Shapiro Brian P, Johns Gretchen S
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 15;121(6):768-774. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
To test dual blood biomarkers compared with electrocardiogram (ECG) for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) screening, we performed 3 analyses and cut-point assessments. First, we measured platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 (n = 99) and normalized B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or NT-proBNP (BNP/upper limit of normal [ULN], n = 92) in 64 patients with HC and 29 normal controls (NCs). Second, from the regression equation between PFA and gradient (r = 0.77), we derived estimated PFA in a population of 189 patients with functional class I HC in whom measured BNP/ULN and ECG were available, and calculated single and dual biomarker sensitivity and specificity compared with ECG. Finally, we compared BNP/ULN in class I patients based on mutation and familial history status. In 42 patients with obstructive HC versus NCs, there was a slight overlap of PFA and BNP/ULN, but for the product of PFA × BNP/ULN, there was near-complete separation of values. Among patients with class I obstructive HC, estimated PFA × BNP/ULN had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 100%; in latent and nonobstructive HC, sensitivity dropped to 61% and 72%; for ECG in obstructive, latent, and nonobstructive HC, sensitivity was 71%, 34%, and 67%. Functional class I patients with positive (n = 28) and negative (n = 36) sarcomere mutations and a positive (n = 71) or a negative (n = 109) family history had significant elevations of BNP/ULN versus NC, with no between-group differences. In conclusion, PFA and BNP were highly associated with obstructive HC and could potentially be used for screening; BNP was not uniquely elevated in patients with familial versus nonfamilial or mutation-positive versus mutation-negative HC.
为了测试与心电图(ECG)相比,双血生物标志物用于肥厚型心肌病(HC)筛查的效果,我们进行了3项分析和切点评估。首先,我们测量了64例HC患者和29例正常对照(NC)的血小板功能分析仪(PFA)-100(n = 99)以及标准化B型利钠肽(BNP)或N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)(BNP/正常上限[ULN],n = 92)。其次,根据PFA与梯度之间的回归方程(r = 0.77),我们在189例I级功能性HC患者群体中推导了估计的PFA,这些患者同时有测量的BNP/ULN和ECG数据,并计算了与ECG相比的单一和双生物标志物的敏感性和特异性。最后,我们根据突变和家族史状态比较了I级患者的BNP/ULN。在42例梗阻性HC患者与NC中,PFA和BNP/ULN有轻微重叠,但对于PFA×BNP/ULN的乘积,数值几乎完全分离。在I级梗阻性HC患者中,估计的PFA×BNP/ULN敏感性为93%,特异性为100%;在隐匿性和非梗阻性HC中,敏感性降至61%和72%;对于梗阻性、隐匿性和非梗阻性HC的ECG,敏感性分别为7