Suppr超能文献

驱动自然资源冲突管理中合作的因素:来自罗马尼亚的证据。

Factors driving collaboration in natural resource conflict management: Evidence from Romania.

机构信息

Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest, Nicolae Balcescu 1, 010041, Bucharest, Romania.

Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Avenue 77, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

出版信息

Ambio. 2018 Nov;47(7):816-830. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1016-0. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

Abstract

A critical challenge in natural resource management is to bring all stakeholders together to negotiate solutions to critical problems. However, various collaborative approaches to heading off conflicts and resolving natural resource management disputes have been used. What drives these efforts, however, still needs further research. Our study provides a systematic look at the drivers likely to initiate collaborative problem-solving efforts in four cases in Romania. We use Emerson's et al. (2012) framework for collaborative governance and multi-value qualitative comparative analysis (mvQCA) to analyze cases involving endangered species, restrictions on forest harvest, conflicts associated with infrastructure development projects, and disputes over the management of environmentally sensitive areas. Our findings contribute to the already existing collaborative governance literature indicating which of the four factors: uncertainty, interdependence, consequential incentives, and leadership, in which combination, are necessary and sufficient to spur collaborative resource management efforts. Our results showed that in Romania the initiation of collaboration is best explained by positive consequential incentives (i.e., financial opportunities) which has determined leaders to take initiative. This study provides additional information for the complicated process of natural resource management which is often overriding collaboration by investigating what enables and constrains collaborative efforts in a country where natural resources were managed and used according to the principles of central planning.

摘要

自然资源管理中的一个关键挑战是将所有利益相关者聚集在一起,共同商讨解决关键问题的方案。然而,已经采用了各种协作方法来避免冲突和解决自然资源管理争端。然而,推动这些努力的因素仍需要进一步研究。我们的研究系统地考察了在罗马尼亚的四个案例中可能引发协作解决问题的努力的驱动因素。我们使用 Emerson 等人(2012 年)的协作治理框架和多值定性比较分析(mvQCA)来分析涉及濒危物种、森林采伐限制、基础设施发展项目相关冲突以及对环境敏感地区管理的争议的案例。我们的研究结果为已经存在的协作治理文献做出了贡献,指出在不确定、相互依存、后果激励和领导力这四个因素中,哪些因素的组合是必要和充分的,以激发协作性资源管理工作。我们的研究结果表明,在罗马尼亚,合作的启动最好由积极的后果激励(即财务机会)来解释,这促使领导者采取主动。这项研究通过调查在一个根据中央计划原则管理和利用自然资源的国家中,哪些因素可以促进和限制协作努力,为自然资源管理这一复杂过程提供了更多信息,而协作努力往往会凌驾于这一过程之上。

相似文献

10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验