Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Roshangaran High School, District 3, Tehran, Iran.
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jul 14;2021:3304553. doi: 10.1155/2021/3304553. eCollection 2021.
Diet and lifestyle can destroy tooth structure due to the dissolution of enamel by acidic beverages. The present study evaluated the effect of CO laser irradiation and CPP-ACFP (casein phosphopeptide and amorphous calcium phosphate with fluoride) paste on the remineralization of enamel eroded by carbonated soft drinks.
In the present in vitro study, 46 human sound premolar teeth were sectioned mesiodistally to achieve 84 samples. Fourteen samples were assigned to the positive control group (G1), and the remaining samples were immersed in 500 mL of cola drink for 2 minutes, followed by rinsing with distilled water for 10 seconds. This procedure was carried out three times to create erosive lesions. Then, the 60 eroded samples were randomly assigned to five groups of G2 to G6 in terms of the treatment as follows: negative control (G2), CO laser irradiation (G3), CPP-ACFP paste (G4), CO laser irradiation followed by CPP-ACFP paste application (G5), and CPP-ACFP paste application followed by CO laser irradiation (G6). The mean surface microhardness of the enamel surface was evaluated and determined at three points for each sample. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests ( = 0.05).
The highest and the lowest hardness values were recorded in the G1 (314 ± 12 kg/mm) and G2 (213.7 ± 12 kg/mm) groups, respectively. ANOVA revealed significant differences between the study groups ( < 0.001). Two-by-two comparisons showed significant differences between the G2 group and the other groups, indicating the efficacy of all the treatment modalities in tooth remineralization and rehardening procedures ( < 0.05). Only in group G6, the enamel microhardness was not significantly different from the G1 positive control group ( > 0.05).
Considering the parameters used in the present study, CO laser irradiation or CPP-ACFP paste application alone increased eroded enamel's surface hardness; however, their sequential application was more effective in rehardening the eroded enamel's surface to near-normal levels.
饮食和生活方式会导致牙釉质溶解,酸性饮料会破坏牙体结构。本研究评估了 CO 激光照射和 CPP-ACFP(酪蛋白磷酸肽和含氟无定形磷酸钙)糊剂对碳酸软饮料侵蚀牙釉质再矿化的影响。
在本体外研究中,将 46 个人类前磨牙沿近远中方向切成 84 个样本。14 个样本被分配到阳性对照组(G1),其余样本浸泡在 500ml 可乐饮料中 2 分钟,然后用蒸馏水冲洗 10 秒。重复该程序三次以形成侵蚀性病变。然后,将 60 个侵蚀样本随机分配到 G2 至 G6 五个组中,处理方式如下:阴性对照组(G2)、CO 激光照射组(G3)、CPP-ACFP 糊剂组(G4)、CO 激光照射后 CPP-ACFP 糊剂应用组(G5)和 CPP-ACFP 糊剂应用后 CO 激光照射组(G6)。评估并确定每个样本三个点的牙釉质表面的平均表面显微硬度。使用单向方差分析和 Tukey HSD 检验进行数据分析( = 0.05)。
G1(314 ± 12kg/mm)组和 G2(213.7 ± 12kg/mm)组的硬度值最高和最低。方差分析显示研究组之间存在显著差异( < 0.001)。两两比较显示,G2 组与其他组之间存在显著差异,表明所有治疗方法在牙齿再矿化和再硬化过程中均有效( < 0.05)。只有在 G6 组中,牙釉质显微硬度与阳性对照组 G1 无显著差异( > 0.05)。
考虑到本研究中使用的参数,CO 激光照射或 CPP-ACFP 糊剂单独应用均可提高侵蚀牙釉质的表面硬度;然而,它们的顺序应用在使侵蚀牙釉质表面再硬化至接近正常水平方面更为有效。