• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中西方人群脑结构差异的全脑形态计量学研究。

Brain structure differences between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts: A comprehensive morphometry study.

机构信息

Research Center for Sectional and Imaging Anatomy, Shandong University Cheeloo College of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China.

School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 May;39(5):2147-2155. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23994. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1002/hbm.23994
PMID:29400417
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6625506/
Abstract

Numerous behavioral observations and brain function studies have demonstrated that neurological differences exist between East Asians and Westerners. However, the extent to which these factors relate to differences in brain structure is still not clear. As the basis of brain functions, the anatomical differences in brain structure play a primary and critical role in the origination of functional and behavior differences. To investigate the underlying differences in brain structure between the two cultural/ethnic groups, we conducted a comparative study on education-matched right-handed young male adults (age = 22-29 years) from two cohorts, Han Chinese (n = 45) and Caucasians (n = 45), using high-dimensional structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Using two well-validated imaging analysis techniques, surface-based morphometry (SBM) and voxel-based morphometry (VBM), we performed a comprehensive vertex-wise morphometric analysis of the brain structures between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts. We identified consistent significant between-group differences in cortical thickness, volume, and surface area in the frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital, and insular lobes as well as the cingulate cortices. The SBM analyses revealed that compared with Caucasians, the Chinese population showed larger cortical structures in the temporal and cingulate regions, and smaller structural measures in the frontal and parietal cortices. The VBM data of the same sample was well-aligned with the SBM findings. Our findings systematically revealed comprehensive brain structural differences between young male Chinese and Caucasians, and provided new neuroanatomical insights to the behavioral and functional distinctions in the two cultural/ethnic populations.

摘要

大量行为观察和脑功能研究表明,东亚人和西方人之间存在神经差异。然而,这些因素与大脑结构差异的关系程度尚不清楚。作为大脑功能的基础,大脑结构的解剖差异在功能和行为差异的起源中起着主要和关键的作用。为了研究这两个文化/种族群体之间大脑结构的潜在差异,我们对来自两个队列的受过教育的右利手年轻男性成年人(年龄= 22-29 岁)进行了一项比较研究,其中包括汉族(n=45)和高加索人(n=45),使用高维结构磁共振成像(MRI)数据。我们使用两种经过充分验证的成像分析技术,即基于表面的形态测量学(SBM)和基于体素的形态测量学(VBM),对中西方队列的大脑结构进行了全面的顶点形态测量分析。我们确定了皮质厚度、体积和表面积在额叶、颞叶、顶叶、枕叶和脑岛以及扣带回皮质之间存在一致的显著组间差异。SBM 分析显示,与高加索人相比,中国人的颞叶和扣带回区域的皮质结构较大,而额叶和顶叶皮质的结构测量值较小。同一样本的 VBM 数据与 SBM 结果非常吻合。我们的研究结果系统地揭示了年轻男性中国人和高加索人之间的全面大脑结构差异,并为这两个文化/种族群体的行为和功能差异提供了新的神经解剖学见解。

相似文献

1
Brain structure differences between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts: A comprehensive morphometry study.中西方人群脑结构差异的全脑形态计量学研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 May;39(5):2147-2155. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23994. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
2
Brain asymmetry differences between Chinese and Caucasian populations: a surface-based morphometric comparison study.中西方人群的大脑不对称性差异:一项基于表面形态计量学的比较研究。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Dec;14(6):2323-2332. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00184-7.
3
Differences in cortical structure between cognitively normal East Asian and Caucasian older adults: a surface-based morphometry study.认知正常的东亚和高加索老年人皮质结构的差异:一项基于表面形态计量学的研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 1;10(1):20905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77848-8.
4
Brain structure in young and old East Asians and Westerners: comparisons of structural volume and cortical thickness.东亚和西方年轻人及老年人的大脑结构:结构体积和皮质厚度的比较。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 May;23(5):1065-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21513. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
5
Constructing and evaluating a cortical surface atlas and analyzing cortical sex differences in young Chinese adults.构建和评估中国人皮质表面图谱及分析中国青年大脑皮质性别差异
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Jun 15;41(9):2495-2513. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24960. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
6
Comprehensive cortical thickness and surface area comparison between young Uyghur and Han Chinese cohorts.维吾尔族和汉族青年人群皮质厚度与表面积的综合比较
Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Oct;34(8):1043-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
7
Radiation-induced abnormal cortical thickness in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy.鼻咽癌患者放疗后辐射诱发的皮质厚度异常
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Mar 2;14:610-621. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.02.025. eCollection 2017.
8
Localized morphological brain differences between English-speaking Caucasians and Chinese-speaking Asians: new evidence of anatomical plasticity.说英语的白种人和说中文的亚洲人之间大脑局部形态学差异:解剖可塑性的新证据。
Neuroreport. 2003 May 23;14(7):961-4. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000075417.59944.00.
9
Common variation in ZNF804A (rs1344706) is not associated with brain morphometry in schizophrenia or healthy participants.常见的 ZNF804A(rs1344706)变异与精神分裂症或健康参与者的脑形态计量学无关。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 2;82:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
10
The construction of a Chinese MRI brain atlas: a morphometric comparison study between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts.中国人脑 MRI 图谱构建:中国人与高加索人群队列的形态计量学比较研究。
Neuroimage. 2010 May 15;51(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.111. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic measurement and reference values setting of intracranial cerebrospinal fluid volume: a large-scale analysis of computed tomography images.颅内脑脊液体积的自动测量与参考值设定:计算机断层扫描图像的大规模分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jul 1;15(7):6185-6199. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2571. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Population-specific brain charts reveal Chinese-Western differences in neurodevelopmental trajectories.特定人群脑图谱揭示了中西神经发育轨迹的差异。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 18:2025.06.17.659820. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.17.659820.
3
Human development, inequality, and their associations with brain structure across 29 countries.29个国家的人类发展、不平等及其与脑结构的关联
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 16;68(1):e100. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10060.
4
Lifestyle, Early-life, and Genetic Health Risk Factors Underlying the Brain Age Gap: A Mega-Analysis Across 3,934 Individuals from the ENIGMA MDD Consortium.脑年龄差距背后的生活方式、早期生活及遗传健康风险因素:对来自ENIGMA MDD联盟的3934名个体的荟萃分析
bioRxiv. 2025 May 11:2025.05.09.653064. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.09.653064.
5
Sex Differences in Cortical Structural Alterations in Major Depressive Disorder With Suicidal Ideation.伴有自杀观念的重度抑郁症患者皮质结构改变中的性别差异
Depress Anxiety. 2025 Jul 2;2025:1706750. doi: 10.1155/da/1706750. eCollection 2025.
6
Interpretable MRI-Based Deep Learning for Alzheimer's Risk and Progression.基于可解释磁共振成像的深度学习用于阿尔茨海默病风险与病情进展研究
medRxiv. 2025 May 7:2025.05.06.25326606. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.06.25326606.
7
Gyral peak variations between HCP and CHCP: functional and structural implications.健康对照人群(HCP)与儿童健康对照人群(CHCP)之间脑回峰值变化:功能和结构方面的影响
Brain Struct Funct. 2025 Feb 4;230(2):37. doi: 10.1007/s00429-025-02894-9.
8
A diffusion MRI tractography atlas for concurrent white matter mapping across Eastern and Western populations.一份用于东西方人群白质同步映射的扩散磁共振成像纤维束图谱。
Sci Data. 2024 Jul 17;11(1):787. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03624-2.
9
Construction and validation of a brain magnetic resonance imaging template for normal older Koreans.构建并验证正常韩国老年人的大脑磁共振成像模板。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03735-8.
10
Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Using Manual Motor Measures.使用手动运动测量对轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病进行分类。
Neurodegener Dis. 2024;24(2):54-70. doi: 10.1159/000539800. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinct distributed patterns of neural activity are associated with two languages in the bilingual brain.双语大脑中的两种语言与不同分布的神经活动模式相关。
Sci Adv. 2017 Jul 12;3(7):e1603309. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1603309. eCollection 2017 Jul.
2
Culture shapes spatial frequency tuning for face identification.文化塑造了用于面部识别的空间频率调谐。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb;43(2):294-306. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000288. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
3
Cultural differences in human brain activity: a quantitative meta-analysis.人类大脑活动中的文化差异:一项定量荟萃分析。
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.062. Epub 2014 May 29.
4
The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.对一张熟悉面孔的认知不过是其各个部分的总和。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1465-72. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0632-3.
5
Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus.人类梭状回的面孔特异性加工。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Fall;9(5):605-10. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.605.
6
Cultural Neuroscience: Progress and Promise.文化神经科学:进展与前景。
Psychol Inq. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):1-19. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2013.752715.
7
Cultural Neuroscience.文化神经科学
Asian J Soc Psychol. 2010 Jun;13(2):72-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01301.x.
8
The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project.人类连接组计划的最小预处理管道。
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:105-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127. Epub 2013 May 11.
9
The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making.内侧前额叶皮层在记忆和决策中的作用。
Neuron. 2012 Dec 20;76(6):1057-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.002.
10
A cultural neuroscience approach to the biosocial nature of the human brain.一种文化神经科学方法研究人类大脑的生物社会本质。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:335-59. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-071112-054629. Epub 2012 Sep 17.