Qualitative evidence to improve guidelines and health decision-making.
作者信息
Langlois Etienne V, Tunçalp Özge, Norris Susan L, Askew Ian, Ghaffar Abdul
机构信息
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
出版信息
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Feb 1;96(2):79-79A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.206540.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Qualitative evidence to improve guidelines and health decision-making.用于改进指南和健康决策的定性证据。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Feb 1;96(2):79-79A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.206540.
2
Decision-making and evidence use during the process of prenatal record review in Canada: a multiphase qualitative study.加拿大产前记录审查过程中的决策制定与证据运用：一项多阶段定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Mar 31;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0503-6.
3
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 2 - Using qualitative evidence synthesis findings to inform evidence-to-decision frameworks and recommendations.定性证据综合（QES）在指南中的应用：第 2 篇 - 使用定性证据综合研究结果来为证据决策框架和建议提供信息。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Aug 8;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0468-4.
4
Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study.生存极限下产前咨询中专业人员的偏好：一项荷兰全国性定性研究
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Aug;176(8):1107-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2952-6. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
5
The use of evidence to guide decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: divergent perspectives from a qualitative case study in British Columbia, Canada.利用证据在 COVID-19 大流行期间指导决策：来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的定性案例研究的不同观点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jun 3;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01146-2.
6
Women's perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions.女性对无创产前检测伦理影响的观点：一项为健康政策决策提供信息的定性分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Apr 16;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0267-4.
7
Provincial prenatal record revision: a multiple case study of evidence-based decision-making at the population-policy level.省级产前记录修订：基于证据的人口政策层面决策的多案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 19;8:266. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-266.
8
Norwegian obstetricians' experiences of the use of ultrasound in pregnancy management. A qualitative study.挪威产科医生在孕期管理中使用超声的经验：一项定性研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Mar;15:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
Clinicians' perspectives of parental decision-making following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: a qualitative study.临床医生对严重先天性异常诊断后父母决策的看法：一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e014716. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014716.
10
Women's Experiences of Publicly Funded Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in Ontario, Canada: Considerations for Health Technology Policy-Making.加拿大安大略省女性接受公共资助的无创产前检测的经历：对卫生技术政策制定的考量
Qual Health Res. 2015 Aug;25(8):1069-84. doi: 10.1177/1049732315589745. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
引用本文的文献
1
Educational inequalities and decomposition of the urban-rural disparities in maternal health care utilization in Ethiopia: further analysis of 2019 intermediate Ethiopian demography and health survey.埃塞俄比亚孕产妇保健利用方面的教育不平等与城乡差距分解：对2019年埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查中期数据的进一步分析
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):3415. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20689-1.
2
Mapping frameworks for synthesizing qualitative evidence in health technology assessment.健康技术评估中综合定性证据的映射框架。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 13;40(1):e53. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000369.
3
Evaluating the impact of the global evidence, local adaptation (GELA) project for enhancing evidence-informed guideline recommendations for newborn and young child health in three African countries: a mixed-methods protocol.评估全球证据、地方适应（GELA）项目对增强三个非洲国家新生儿和幼儿健康循证指南建议的影响：一项混合方法研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 19;22(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01189-5.
4
Multilevel negative binomial analysis of factors associated with numbers of antenatal care contacts in low and middle income countries: Findings from 59 nationally representative datasets.多水平负二项分析与中低收入国家产前保健接触次数相关的因素：来自 59 个国家代表性数据集的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0301542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301542. eCollection 2024.
5
Assessing unConventional Evidence (ACE) tool: development and content of a tool to assess the strengths and limitations of 'unconventional' source materials.评估非常规证据（ACE）工具：开发和内容评估“非常规”来源材料的优势和局限性的工具。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 2;22(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01080-9.
6
Multilevel Count Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with the Desired Number of Antenatal Care Service Visits in Ethiopia.多水平计数回归分析与埃塞俄比亚期望产前保健服务就诊次数相关的因素。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Aug;11(4):1973-1983. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01666-7. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
7
Disclosing Child Sexual Abuse to a Health Professional: A Metasynthesis.向医疗专业人员披露儿童性虐待：一项综合分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 3;13:788123. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.788123. eCollection 2022.
8
Towards User-Centred Prosthetics Research Beyond the Laboratory.迈向超越实验室的以用户为中心的假肢研究。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Apr 14;16:863833. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.863833. eCollection 2022.
9
How can WHO transform its approach to social determinants of health?世界卫生组织如何转变其对健康的社会决定因素的方法？
BMJ. 2022 Feb 8;376:e066172. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066172.
10
Number of antenatal care utilization and associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia: zero-inflated Poisson regression of 2019 intermediate Ethiopian Demography Health Survey.《2019 年埃塞俄比亚中期人口与健康调查：零膨胀泊松回归分析孕产妇产前保健利用情况及其影响因素》
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 5;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01347-4.
本文引用的文献
1
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况：一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
2
What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women.对女性重要的事项：一项系统性综述，旨在确定对健康孕妇而言重要的产前护理提供过程及结果。
BJOG. 2016 Mar;123(4):529-39. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13819. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
3
Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual).在卫生和社会干预决策中使用定性证据：一种评估定性证据综合结果可信度的方法（GRADE-CERQual）
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 27;12(10):e1001895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895. eCollection 2015 Oct.
4
The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.全球医疗机构中分娩期间对妇女的虐待：一项混合方法的系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2015 Jun 30;12(6):e1001847; discussion e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847. eCollection 2015 Jun.
5
Social and cultural factors affecting uptake of interventions for malaria in pregnancy in Africa: a systematic review of the qualitative research.社会和文化因素对非洲孕妇疟疾干预措施的影响：定性研究的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022452. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
Zotero 插件