• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心不在焉:缺乏变化会导致思维漫游。

Driven to distraction: A lack of change gives rise to mind wandering.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, United States; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2018 Apr;173:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.007
PMID:29405946
Abstract

How does the dynamic structure of the external world direct attention? We examined the relationship between event structure and attention to test the hypothesis that narrative shifts (both theoretical and perceived) negatively predict attentional lapses. Self-caught instances of mind wandering were collected while 108 participants watched a 32.5 min film called The Red Balloon. We used theoretical codings of situational change and human perceptions of event boundaries to predict mind wandering in 5-s intervals. Our findings suggest a temporal alignment between the structural dynamics of the film and mind wandering reports. Specifically, the number of situational changes and likelihood of perceiving event boundaries in the prior 0-15 s interval negatively predicted mind wandering net of low-level audiovisual features. Thus, mind wandering is less likely to occur when there is more event change, suggesting that narrative shifts keep attention from drifting inwards.

摘要

外部世界的动态结构如何引导注意力?我们研究了事件结构和注意力之间的关系,以检验一个假设,即叙事转变(理论上和感知上的)负预测注意力分散。在 108 名参与者观看了一部名为《红气球》的 32.5 分钟长的电影时,我们收集了自我捕捉到的思维漫游实例。我们使用情境变化的理论编码和人类对事件边界的感知来预测每 5 秒的思维漫游。我们的发现表明电影的结构动态和思维漫游报告之间存在时间上的一致性。具体来说,在前 0-15 秒间隔内的情境变化次数和感知事件边界的可能性负预测了思维漫游,这与低水平的视听特征无关。因此,当事件变化更多时,思维漫游不太可能发生,这表明叙事转变阻止了注意力向内漂移。

相似文献

1
Driven to distraction: A lack of change gives rise to mind wandering.心不在焉:缺乏变化会导致思维漫游。
Cognition. 2018 Apr;173:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.007.
2
Mind wandering during film comprehension: The role of prior knowledge and situational interest.电影理解过程中的走神:先验知识和情境兴趣的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Jun;23(3):842-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0936-y.
3
Re-reading after mind wandering.走神后重新阅读。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):203-211. doi: 10.1037/cep0000123. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
4
The more your mind wanders, the smaller your attentional blink: an individual differences study.思维越分散,注意瞬脱越小:一项个体差异研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(1):181-91. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.940985. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
5
Can I get me out of my head? Exploring strategies for controlling the self-referential aspects of the mind-wandering state during reading.我能摆脱自己的思绪吗?探索在阅读过程中控制走神状态下自我指涉方面的策略。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jun;70(6):1053-1062. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1216573. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
An automated behavioral measure of mind wandering during computerized reading.一种在计算机阅读过程中自动测量思维漫游的行为测量方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):134-150. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0857-y.
7
On the influence of re-reading on mind wandering.重读对走神的影响
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Dec;69(12):2338-2357. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1107109. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
8
Changes in situation models modulate processes of event perception in audiovisual narratives.情境模型的变化会调节视听叙事中事件感知的过程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1377-88. doi: 10.1037/a0036780. Epub 2014 May 12.
9
Influencing the occurrence of mind wandering while reading.影响阅读时走神现象的发生。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Jul;34:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory.时间对任务的影响与思维漫游和视觉工作记忆。
Cognition. 2017 Dec;169:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relative Accuracy of Different Methods for Measuring Mind Wandering Subtypes: A Systematic Review.测量思维游荡亚型的不同方法的相对准确性:一项系统综述。
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70764. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70764.
2
Boundaries in the eyes: Measure event segmentation during naturalistic video watching using eye tracking.眼睛中的边界:使用眼动追踪技术测量自然视频观看过程中的事件分割
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 12;57(9):255. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02790-4.
3
Temporal smearing across related visual images eliminates the attentional boost effect.
相关视觉图像间的时间模糊消除了注意力增强效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):752-767. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03047-0. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
4
Grounding the Attentional Boost Effect in Events and the Efficient Brain.将注意力增强效应基于事件和高效大脑。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:892416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892416. eCollection 2022.
5
Measuring event segmentation: An investigation into the stability of event boundary agreement across groups.测量事件分割:跨群体事件边界一致性稳定性的研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):428-447. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01832-5. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
6
Scene meaningfulness guides eye movements even during mind-wandering.场景意义即使在走神时也能引导眼球运动。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 May;84(4):1130-1150. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02370-6. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
7
Serial memory for landmarks encountered during route navigation.在路线导航过程中遇到地标物的连续记忆。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Dec;74(12):2137-2153. doi: 10.1177/17470218211020745. Epub 2021 May 25.
8
How deep is the rift between conscious states in sleep and wakefulness? Spontaneous experience over the sleep-wake cycle.睡眠和清醒状态之间的意识状态差距有多大?睡眠-觉醒周期中的自发性体验。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Feb;376(1817):20190696. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0696. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
9
How the stimulus influences mind wandering in semantically rich task contexts.在语义丰富的任务情境中,刺激如何影响思维游荡。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018 Sep 26;3(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0129-0.
10
Event Boundaries in Memory and Cognition.记忆与认知中的事件边界
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017 Oct;17:133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 21.