Iliadou Vasiliki, Kiese-Himmel Christiane
Neuroscience, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Phoniatric and Pediatric Audiological Psychology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Front Neurol. 2018 Jan 23;8:732. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00732. eCollection 2017.
Pediatric hearing evaluation based on pure tone audiometry does not always reflect how a child hears in everyday life. This practice is inappropriate when evaluating the difficulties children experiencing auditory processing disorder (APD) in school or on the playground. Despite the marked increase in research on pediatric APD, there remains limited access to proper evaluation worldwide. This perspective article presents five common misconceptions of APD that contribute to inappropriate or limited management in children experiencing these deficits. The misconceptions discussed are (1) the disorder cannot be diagnosed due to the lack of a gold standard diagnostic test; (2) making generalizations based on profiles of children suspected of APD and not diagnosed with the disorder; (3) it is best to discard an APD diagnosis when another disorder is present; (4) arguing that the known link between auditory perception and higher cognition function precludes the validity of APD as a clinical entity; and (5) APD is not a clinical entity. These five misconceptions are described and rebutted using published data as well as critical thinking on current available knowledge on APD.
基于纯音听力测定的小儿听力评估并不总能反映儿童在日常生活中的听力情况。在评估患有听觉处理障碍(APD)的儿童在学校或操场上所遇到的困难时,这种做法并不恰当。尽管关于小儿APD的研究显著增加,但在全球范围内,获得适当评估的机会仍然有限。这篇观点文章提出了关于APD的五个常见误解,这些误解导致了对有这些缺陷的儿童进行不恰当或有限的管理。所讨论的误解包括:(1)由于缺乏金标准诊断测试,该障碍无法被诊断;(2)基于疑似APD但未被诊断出该障碍的儿童特征进行概括;(3)当存在另一种障碍时,最好放弃APD诊断;(4)认为听觉感知与更高认知功能之间已知的联系排除了APD作为一种临床实体的有效性;(5)APD不是一种临床实体。使用已发表的数据以及对当前关于APD的现有知识的批判性思考,对这五个误解进行了描述和反驳。