• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用关系代理促进锻炼和防晒:对两种干预措施参与者体验的评估。

Using Relational Agents to Promote Exercise and Sun Protection: Assessment of Participants' Experiences With Two Interventions.

作者信息

Sillice Marie A, Morokoff Patricia J, Ferszt Ginette, Bickmore Timothy, Bock Beth C, Lantini Ryan, Velicer Wayne F

机构信息

Department of of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.

College of Arts and Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 7;20(2):e48. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7640.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.7640
PMID:29415873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5822036/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Relational agents (RAs) are electronic computational figures designed to engage participants in the change process. A recent study, Project RAISE, tested the effectiveness of RAs, combined with existing computer-based interventions to increase regular exercise and sun protection behaviors. Results showed these interventions can be effective but need further development.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine participants' experiences using RAs to increase participant engagement and promote behavior change .

METHODS

A qualitative approach was primarily utilized. A 25-question interview guide assessed different components of participants' experiences with the intervention, including motivation, engagement, satisfaction or dissatisfaction, quality of their interaction with the RA, and behavior change. Quantitative assessment of satisfaction was based on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 representing least satisfied and 10 representing most satisfied. A summative analytic approach was used to assess individuals' qualitative responses. A single analysis of variance (ANOVA) examined levels of satisfaction by gender.

RESULTS

Of the original 1354 participants enrolled in Project RAISE, 490 of 1354 (36%) were assigned to the RA group. A sample of 216 out of 490 (44%) participants assigned to the RA group completed the interventions, and follow-up assessments were contacted to participate in the semistructured interview. A total of 34 out of 216 (16%) completed the interview. Participants were motivated by, and satisfied with, the intervention. Participants viewed the RA as supportive, informative, caring, and reported positive behavior change in both exercise and sun protection. Some participants (15/34, 44%) noted the RA was less judgmental and less "overbearing" compared with a human counselor; other participants (12/34, 35%) said that the interaction was sometimes repetitive or overly general. The majority of participants (22/34, 65%) viewed the RA as an important contributor to their behavior change for exercise, sun protection, or both. Levels of satisfaction ranged between 7 and 10. There were no gender differences noted in levels of satisfaction (P=.51).

CONCLUSIONS

RAs provide an innovative and attractive platform to increase exercise and sun protection behaviors and potentially other health behaviors.

摘要

背景

关系代理(RAs)是旨在促使参与者参与改变过程的电子计算角色。最近一项名为“RAISE项目”的研究测试了关系代理与现有的基于计算机的干预措施相结合,以增加定期锻炼和防晒行为的有效性。结果表明,这些干预措施可能有效,但需要进一步改进。

目的

本研究的目的是调查参与者使用关系代理来提高参与度并促进行为改变的体验。

方法

主要采用定性研究方法。一份包含25个问题的访谈指南评估了参与者在干预过程中的不同体验,包括动机、参与度、满意或不满意程度、与关系代理互动的质量以及行为改变。满意度的定量评估基于1至10分的量表,1分表示最不满意,10分表示最满意。采用总结性分析方法评估个体的定性回答。单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验了不同性别的满意度水平。

结果

在最初参与“RAISE项目”的1354名参与者中,490名(36%)被分配到关系代理组。在分配到关系代理组的490名参与者中,216名(44%)完成了干预措施,并被联系进行后续评估以参与半结构化访谈。在216名参与者中,共有34名(16%)完成了访谈。参与者受到干预措施的激励并对其感到满意。参与者认为关系代理具有支持性、信息丰富、关怀他人,并报告在锻炼和防晒方面有积极的行为改变。一些参与者(15/34,44%)指出,与人类顾问相比,关系代理的评判性较低且不那么“专横”;其他参与者(12/34,35%)表示互动有时会重复或过于笼统。大多数参与者(22/34,65%)认为关系代理是他们在锻炼、防晒或两者行为改变的重要促成因素。满意度水平在7至10分之间。在满意度水平上未发现性别差异(P = 0.51)。

结论

关系代理为增加锻炼和防晒行为以及潜在的其他健康行为提供了一个创新且有吸引力的平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c7/5822036/a2d721688c49/jmir_v20i2e48_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c7/5822036/a2d721688c49/jmir_v20i2e48_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c7/5822036/a2d721688c49/jmir_v20i2e48_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Relational Agents to Promote Exercise and Sun Protection: Assessment of Participants' Experiences With Two Interventions.使用关系代理促进锻炼和防晒:对两种干预措施参与者体验的评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 7;20(2):e48. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7640.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Self-Monitoring App Preferences for Sun Protection: Discrete Choice Experiment Survey Analysis.自我监测防晒应用偏好:离散选择实验调查分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 27;22(11):e18889. doi: 10.2196/18889.
4
5
Knowledge and attitudes of UK university students in relation to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure and their sun-related behaviours: a qualitative study.英国大学生关于紫外线(UVR)暴露及其与阳光相关行为的知识和态度:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 13;7(3):e014388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014388.
6
Decision Tree Model vs Traditional Measures to Identify Patterns of Sun-Protective Behaviors and Sun Sensitivity Associated With Sunburn.决策树模型与传统方法在识别与晒伤相关的防晒行为和日光敏感性模式中的比较。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Aug 1;154(8):897-902. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1646.
7
Effects of UV photographs, photoaging information, and use of sunless tanning lotion on sun protection behaviors.紫外线照片、光老化信息以及使用免晒美黑乳液对防晒行为的影响。
Arch Dermatol. 2005 Mar;141(3):373-80. doi: 10.1001/archderm.141.3.373.
8
Spoken Animated Self-Management Video Messages Aimed at Improving Physical Activity in People With Type 2 Diabetes: Development and Interview Study.旨在改善2型糖尿病患者身体活动的语音动画自我管理视频信息:开发与访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 23;22(4):e15397. doi: 10.2196/15397.
9
Evaluation of a Brief Dermatologist-Delivered Intervention vs Usual Care on Sun Protection Behavior.皮肤科医生提供的简短干预措施与常规护理对防晒行为的效果评估。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Sep 1;154(9):1010-1016. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2331.
10
Sun Safe Partners Online: Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.阳光安全伙伴在线:一项随机对照临床试验的试点研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 17;22(9):e18037. doi: 10.2196/18037.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating the design of simulated exercising peers: insights from a participatory design study.探索模拟锻炼伙伴的设计:来自一项参与式设计研究的见解
Front Digit Health. 2025 May 12;7:1551966. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1551966. eCollection 2025.
2
Neural Conversational Agent for Weight Loss Counseling: Protocol for an Implementation and Feasibility Study.用于减肥咨询的神经对话代理:实施和可行性研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 20;13:e60361. doi: 10.2196/60361.
3
Evaluation of the Current State of Chatbots for Digital Health: Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing demographic differences in decisional balance for smoking prevention and temptations to try smoking among adolescent subgroups.评估青少年亚组在预防吸烟的决策平衡和尝试吸烟诱惑方面的人口统计学差异。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2017 May 11;3:14. doi: 10.18332/tpc/70562. eCollection 2017.
2
Psychometric assessment of the processes of change scale for sun protection.防晒措施变化过程量表的心理评估。
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Jan;23(1):39-45. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1325504. Epub 2017 May 7.
3
Reducing Sun Exposure for Prevention of Skin Cancers: Factorial Invariance and Reliability of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Sun Protection.
评估数字健康领域的聊天机器人现状:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 19;25:e47217. doi: 10.2196/47217.
4
Factors Influencing the Acceptability, Acceptance, and Adoption of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Integrative Review.影响医疗保健中会话代理的可接受性、接受度和采用的因素:综合回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 26;25:e46548. doi: 10.2196/46548.
5
Effectiveness of a tailored web app on sun protection intentions and its implications for skin cancer prevention: A randomized controlled trial.一款定制化网络应用程序对防晒意图的有效性及其对皮肤癌预防的意义:一项随机对照试验。
PLOS Digit Health. 2022 May 12;1(5):e0000032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000032. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Design Validation of a Relational Agent by COVID-19 Patients: Mixed Methods Study.COVID-19患者对关系型智能体的设计验证:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jun 8;10:e42740. doi: 10.2196/42740.
7
Effects of personalization and source expertise on users' health beliefs and usage intention toward health chatbots: Evidence from an online experiment.个性化和来源专业度对用户健康信念及健康聊天机器人使用意愿的影响:来自一项在线实验的证据
Digit Health. 2022 Oct 2;8:20552076221129718. doi: 10.1177/20552076221129718. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
Application of 5G network combined with AI robots in personalized nursing in China: A literature review.5G 网络与人工智能机器人在中国个性化护理中的应用:文献综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;10:948303. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.948303. eCollection 2022.
9
Machine Learning in Health Promotion and Behavioral Change: Scoping Review.机器学习在健康促进和行为改变中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 2;24(6):e35831. doi: 10.2196/35831.
10
Meeting Users Where They Are: User-centered Design of an Automated Text Messaging Tool to Support the Mental Health of Young Adults.在用户所在之处与他们相遇:以用户为中心设计自动短信工具以支持年轻人的心理健康。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2022 Apr;2022. doi: 10.1145/3491102.3502046. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
减少阳光暴露以预防皮肤癌:防晒自我效能量表的因子不变性和信度
J Skin Cancer. 2015;2015:862732. doi: 10.1155/2015/862732. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
4
Validity and stability of the decisional balance for sun protection inventory.防晒清单决策平衡的有效性和稳定性。
J Skin Cancer. 2014;2014:190541. doi: 10.1155/2014/190541. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
5
A randomized controlled trial of an automated exercise coach for older adults.一项针对老年人的自动化运动教练的随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Oct;61(10):1676-83. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12449. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
6
Sunburn and sun protective behaviors among adults aged 18-29 years--United States, 2000-2010.18-29 岁成年人的晒伤和防晒行为——美国,2000-2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 May 11;61(18):317-22.
7
Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education.通过更好地了解和教育患者来改善健康结果。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2010;3:61-72. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S7500. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
8
The meaning of 'satisfaction' for people with dermatological problems: reassessing approaches to qualitative health psychology research.患有皮肤病人群的“满意度”的意义:重新评估定性健康心理学研究的方法。
J Health Psychol. 2002 Sep;7(5):615-29. doi: 10.1177/1359105302007005681.
9
Developing a computer delivered, theory based intervention for guideline implementation in general practice.开发基于理论的计算机辅助干预措施,以在一般实践中实施指南。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Nov 18;11:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-90.
10
A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change.计算机定制干预健康行为改变的荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;51(3-4):214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jun 15.