Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 33620.
Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, Fargo, North Dakota.
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Apr;51(4):363-367. doi: 10.1002/eat.22839. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
Although the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire (SATAQ) and Ideal Body Stereotype Scale (IBSS) are used interchangeably to assess thin ideal internalization, limited work has examined the assumption that the two measures index the same construct.
The current study utilized confirmatory factor analysis to examine whether these measures capture a single construct (one-factor), two constructs (two-factor), or both shared and unique constructs (bifactor). The SATAQ-4R-Internalization: Thin/Low Body Fat subscale and IBSS-Revised were administered to 1,114 college females.
A bifactor model provided the best fit to the data. Further, the SATAQ-4R was more strongly related to disordered eating and body satisfaction than the IBSS-R.
Results indicate that the two most commonly used measures of internalization capture both shared and unique constructs. While both measures appear to contribute to the assessment of a global internalization factor, the SATAQ-4R may be better suited to assess personal acceptance of and desire to achieve a thin body, while the IBSS-R may be better suited to assess an awareness or acknowledgement of broader sociocultural ideals (e.g., toned, shapely bodies). Continued psychometric investigation of the scales is recommended in order to ensure targeted assessment of the intended constructs.
虽然社会文化态度量表(SATAQ)和理想体型量表(IBSS)经常互换使用来评估对瘦体型的内化程度,但很少有研究检验这两个测量工具是否都可以评估同一个结构。
本研究采用验证性因素分析来检验这两个测量工具是否可以评估单一结构(单因素)、两个结构(双因素)或共同和独特结构(双因素)。SATAQ-4R-内化:瘦/低体脂分量表和 IBSS-R 修订版被用于 1114 名女大学生。
双因素模型最符合数据。此外,SATAQ-4R 与饮食失调和身体满意度的相关性强于 IBSS-R。
结果表明,最常用的两种内化测量工具都可以同时捕捉到共同和独特的结构。虽然这两个测量工具都可以用来评估一个整体的内化因素,但 SATAQ-4R 可能更适合评估个人对瘦体型的接受程度和追求愿望,而 IBSS-R 可能更适合评估对更广泛的社会文化理想(如匀称、有曲线美的体型)的意识或认可。为了确保对目标结构的有针对性评估,建议对这些量表进行进一步的心理计量学研究。