Suppr超能文献

体像内化:多少算太多?

Thin-ideal internalization: How much is too much?

机构信息

Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, 120 Eighth Street South, Fargo, ND, 58103, USA.

Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Oct;24(5):933-937. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0498-x. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

Abstract

Internalization of the thin-ideal is a risk factor for eating disorders that frequently persists into recovery and increases patient risk for relapse. Addressing thin-ideal internalization as a core element of eating disorder prevention and treatment produces significant reductions in eating pathology. However, research has not yet quantified levels of thin-ideal internalization that may signal increased versus decreased risk for disordered eating. To address this gap in the literature, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify a thin-ideal internalization cutoff score that signified clinically-meaningful eating disorder pathology. 787 college women (age M = 20.17, SD = 2.41; BMI M = 23.58, SD = 5.29) were classified as "healthy" (N = 717) or those with significant disordered eating (N = 70) using established clinical cutoffs for the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire. ROC curve analysis was used to test the performance of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4) Internalization: Thin/Low Body Fat subscale in predicting disordered eating status, and to identify a cutoff score that maximized sensitivity and specificity to discriminate between healthy and disordered eating samples. Mean SATAQ-4 internalization scores were 3.29 (SD = 0.92) and 4.27 (SD = 0.62) for healthy and disordered eating participants, respectively. The SATAQ-4 internalization scores were good predictors of disordered eating status (area under the curve = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.86). The optimal cutoff of 3.78 (measured on a 1-5 Likert scale) yielded a sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.64. Overall, results provide preliminary support for the discriminant validity of SATAQ-4 thin internalization scores and suggest that even moderate levels of thin-ideal internalization may be predictive of clinically-significant eating pathology. It may be important for prevention and intervention work to actively seek to reduce internalization levels below this clinical cutoff, though future work is needed to bear this out.

摘要

内化瘦理想是饮食失调的一个风险因素,这种风险在康复后经常持续存在,并增加患者复发的风险。将瘦理想内化作为饮食失调预防和治疗的核心要素,可以显著减少饮食病理学。然而,研究尚未量化可能表明进食障碍风险增加或降低的瘦理想内化水平。为了填补这一文献空白,使用接收者操作特征 (ROC) 曲线分析来确定一个瘦理想内化的截止分数,该分数表示具有临床意义的饮食病理学。787 名女大学生(年龄 M = 20.17,SD = 2.41;BMI M = 23.58,SD = 5.29)根据饮食障碍检查问卷的既定临床标准,分为“健康”组(N = 717)或存在明显饮食失调的组(N = 70)。ROC 曲线分析用于测试社会文化对外观态度问卷-4(SATAQ-4)内化:瘦/低体脂子量表预测饮食失调状态的表现,并确定一个截止分数,以最大限度地提高区分健康和饮食失调样本的敏感性和特异性。健康和饮食失调参与者的 SATAQ-4 内化平均得分分别为 3.29(SD = 0.92)和 4.27(SD = 0.62)。SATAQ-4 内化得分是饮食失调状态的良好预测指标(曲线下面积 = 0.81,95%置信区间:0.76-0.86)。3.78 的最佳截止值(在 1-5 级李克特量表上测量)产生了 0.81 的敏感性和 0.64 的特异性。总体而言,结果初步支持 SATAQ-4 瘦内化分数的判别有效性,并表明即使是中度的瘦理想内化也可能预测具有临床意义的饮食病理学。对于预防和干预工作来说,积极寻求将内化水平降低到这个临床截止值以下可能很重要,但需要进一步的工作来证实这一点。

相似文献

1
Thin-ideal internalization: How much is too much?体像内化:多少算太多?
Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Oct;24(5):933-937. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0498-x. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验