Alió Jorge L, Simonov Aleksey N, Romero Daniel, Angelov Alexander, Angelov Yavor, van Lawick Willem, Rombach Michiel C
J Refract Surg. 2018 Feb 1;34(2):78-83. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20171205-01.
To compare objective and subjective accommodation and visual acuities with a new accommodative intraocular lens (IOL) (Lumina; AkkoLens Clinical BV, Rijswijk, The Netherlands) with a monofocal IOL and young phakic eyes.
In this prospective, randomized controlled clinical investigation, patients aged 51 to 85 years with symptomatic cataract were enrolled in the study. A total of 25 eyes were implanted with the accommodative IOL and 18 eyes received the monofocal Acrysof SA60AT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). Each group included 4 bilateral patients. An additional 20 phakic eyes of young patients aged 19 to 29 years were used to assess the restoration of accommodation. Subjective and objective accommodative amplitudes were evaluated by defocus curves and the WAM-5500 open-field Auto Ref/Keratometer (Grand Seiko, Tokyo, Japan), respectively.
The 1-year postoperative examination showed significantly better visual acuities with the accommodative IOL compared to the monofocal IOL, over a defocus range of -0.50 to -5.00 diopters (D) (P < 10), and revealed more than 50% of the visual acuities of the young phakic eyes at up to -3.50 D defocus. The depth of focus of the accommodative group exceeded that of the monofocal group by 2.52 ± 0.03 D in a visual acuity range of 0.3 to 0.8 (decimal) (20/63 to 20/25 Snellen). Compared with the monofocal IOL, the accommodative IOL resulted in a similar uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.99 ± 0.12 (20/20 Snellen) (P > .79) and a significantly better uncorrected near visual acuity of 0.91 ± 0.11 (20/22 Snellen) (P < 2.7 × 10). A significant correlation of 0.51 (P < 1.3 × 10) was found between the objective and subjective accommodative amplitudes with the accommodative IOL.
Eyes implanted with the accommodative IOL showed similar amounts of objective and subjective accommodation. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(2):78-83.].
比较新型可调节人工晶状体(IOL)(Lumina;AkkoLens Clinical BV,荷兰赖斯韦克)与单焦点IOL及年轻有晶状体眼的客观和主观调节力及视力。
在这项前瞻性、随机对照临床研究中,纳入了51至85岁有症状性白内障的患者。共25只眼植入了可调节IOL,18只眼植入了单焦点Acrysof SA60AT IOL(爱尔康实验室公司,美国得克萨斯州沃思堡)。每组包括4例双侧患者。另外选取了20只19至29岁年轻患者的有晶状体眼用于评估调节力的恢复情况。分别通过散焦曲线和WAM-5500开放式自动验光/角膜曲率计(日本东京精工)评估主观和客观调节幅度。
术后1年的检查显示,与单焦点IOL相比,可调节IOL在-0.50至-5.00屈光度(D)的散焦范围内视力明显更好(P < 0.10),并且在散焦达-3.50 D时显示出超过50%的年轻有晶状体眼的视力。在视力范围为0.3至0.8(小数)(20/63至20/25斯内伦)时,可调节组的焦深比单焦点组超出2.52±0.03 D。与单焦点IOL相比,可调节IOL的未矫正远视力相似,为0.99±0.12(20/20斯内伦)(P > 0.79),未矫正近视力明显更好,为0.91±0.11(20/22斯内伦)(P < 2.7×10⁻⁴)。可调节IOL的客观和主观调节幅度之间存在显著相关性,相关系数为0.51(P < 1.3×⁻¹⁰)。
植入可调节IOL的眼显示出相似程度的客观和主观调节力。[《屈光手术杂志》。2018;34(2):78 - 83。]