Suppr超能文献

《十字路口的阐释》:毛利人如何理解西方精神病学中所称的“精神分裂症”

Ngā Whakāwhitinga (standing at the crossroads): How Māori understand what Western psychiatry calls "schizophrenia".

作者信息

Taitimu Melissa, Read John, McIntosh Tracey

机构信息

MAIA Psychological Services.

4917 University of East London.

出版信息

Transcult Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;55(2):153-177. doi: 10.1177/1363461518757800. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

Abstract

This project explored how Māori understand experiences commonly labelled "schizophrenic" or "psychotic". Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 57 Māori participants who had either personal experiences labelled as "psychosis" or "schizophrenia", or who work with people with such experiences; including tangata whaiora (users of mental health services), tohunga (traditional healers), kaumatua/kuia (elders), Māori clinicians, cultural support workers and students. Kaupapa Māori Theory and Personal Construct Theory guided the research within a qualitative methodology. The research found that participants held multiple explanatory models for experiences commonly labelled "psychotic" or "schizophrenic". The predominant explanations were spiritual and cultural. It seems that cultural beliefs and practices related to mental health within Māori communities remain resilient, despite over a century of contact with mainstream education and health services. Other explanations included psychosocial constructions (interpersonal trauma and drug abuse), historical trauma (colonisation) and biomedical constructions (chemical brain imbalance). Participants (both tangata whaiora and health professionals) reported they were apprehensive about sharing their spiritual/cultural constructions within mainstream mental health settings due to fear of being ignored or pathologised. This study highlights the importance of asking users of mental health services about the meaning they place on their experiences and recognising that individuals can hold multiple explanatory models. Māori may hold both Māori and Pākehā (European) ways of understanding their experiences and meaningful recognition should be afforded to both throughout assessment and treatment planning in mental health services. Clinicians need to be aware that important personal and cultural meanings of experiences labelled psychotic may be withheld due to fear of judgement or stigmatisation.

摘要

该项目探讨了毛利人如何理解通常被贴上“精神分裂症”或“精神病性”标签的经历。对57名毛利参与者进行了半结构化访谈,这些参与者要么有被贴上“精神病”或“精神分裂症”标签的个人经历,要么与有此类经历的人一起工作;包括心理健康服务使用者(tangata whaiora)、传统治疗师(tohunga)、长老(kaumatua/kuia)、毛利临床医生、文化支持工作者和学生。毛利 kaupapa 理论和个人建构理论在定性研究方法中指导了这项研究。研究发现,参与者对通常被贴上“精神病性”或“精神分裂症”标签的经历持有多种解释模型。主要的解释是精神层面和文化层面的。尽管与主流教育和卫生服务接触了一个多世纪,但毛利社区中与心理健康相关的文化信仰和实践似乎仍然具有韧性。其他解释包括社会心理建构(人际创伤和药物滥用)、历史创伤(殖民化)和生物医学建构(化学性脑失衡)。参与者(包括心理健康服务使用者和卫生专业人员)报告说,由于担心被忽视或被病态化,他们在主流心理健康环境中分享自己的精神/文化建构时感到担忧。这项研究强调了询问心理健康服务使用者他们对自己经历的理解的重要性,并认识到个人可以持有多种解释模型。毛利人可能同时持有毛利和欧洲(白人)理解自己经历的方式,在心理健康服务的评估和治疗计划中,应该对这两种方式都给予有意义的认可。临床医生需要意识到,由于担心被评判或被污名化,被贴上精神病性标签的经历的重要个人和文化意义可能会被隐瞒。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验