Khan Shahid N, Persons John D, Paulsen Janet L, Guerrero Michel, Schiffer Celia A, Kurt-Yilmaz Nese, Ishima Rieko
Department of Structural Biology , University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania 15260 , United States.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology , University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester , Massachusetts 01605 , United States.
Biochemistry. 2018 Mar 13;57(10):1652-1662. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01238. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
In the era of state-of-the-art inhibitor design and high-resolution structural studies, detection of significant but small protein structural differences in the inhibitor-bound forms is critical to further developing the inhibitor. Here, we probed differences in HIV-1 protease (PR) conformation among darunavir and four analogous inhibitor-bound forms and compared them with a drug-resistant mutant using nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts. Changes in amide chemical shifts of wild-type (WT) PR among these inhibitor-bound forms, ΔCSP, were subtle but detectable and extended >10 Å from the inhibitor-binding site, asymmetrically between the two subunits of PR. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed differential local hydrogen bonding as the molecular basis of this remote asymmetric change. Inhibitor-bound forms of the drug-resistant mutant also showed a similar long-range ΔCSP pattern. Differences in ΔCSP values of the WT and the mutant (ΔΔCSPs) were observed at the inhibitor-binding site and in the surrounding region. Comparing chemical shift changes among highly analogous inhibitors and ΔΔCSPs effectively eliminated local environmental effects stemming from different chemical groups and enabled exploitation of these sensitive parameters to detect subtle protein conformational changes and to elucidate asymmetric and remote conformational effects upon inhibitor interaction.
在最先进的抑制剂设计和高分辨率结构研究时代,检测抑制剂结合形式中显著但微小的蛋白质结构差异对于进一步开发抑制剂至关重要。在此,我们利用核磁共振化学位移探究了达芦那韦与四种类似抑制剂结合形式下HIV-1蛋白酶(PR)构象的差异,并将它们与一种耐药突变体进行了比较。野生型(WT)PR在这些抑制剂结合形式之间酰胺化学位移的变化,即ΔCSP,虽然细微但可检测到,并且从抑制剂结合位点延伸超过10 Å,在PR的两个亚基之间不对称分布。分子动力学模拟揭示了差异局部氢键作用是这种远程不对称变化的分子基础。耐药突变体的抑制剂结合形式也呈现出类似的远程ΔCSP模式。在抑制剂结合位点及其周围区域观察到了WT和突变体的ΔCSP值差异(ΔΔCSPs)。比较高度类似抑制剂之间的化学位移变化和ΔΔCSPs有效地消除了不同化学基团产生的局部环境影响,并能够利用这些敏感参数检测蛋白质的细微构象变化,以及阐明抑制剂相互作用时的不对称和远程构象效应。