Suppr超能文献

与检测差异相关的艰难梭菌感染率的人为差异。

Artificial Differences in Clostridium difficile Infection Rates Associated with Disparity in Testing.

出版信息

Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;24(3):584-587. doi: 10.3201/eid2403.170961.

Abstract

In 2015, Clostridium difficile testing rates among 30 US community, multispecialty, and cancer hospitals were 14.0, 16.3, and 33.9/1,000 patient-days, respectively. Pooled hospital onset rates were 0.56, 0.84, and 1.57/1,000 patient-days, respectively. Higher testing rates may artificially inflate reported rates of C. difficile infection. C. difficile surveillance should consider testing frequency.

摘要

2015 年,美国 30 家社区、多专科和癌症医院艰难梭菌检测率分别为 14.0、16.3 和 33.9/1000 患者日。汇总的医院发病(感染)率分别为 0.56、0.84 和 1.57/1000 患者日。较高的检测率可能会人为地增加艰难梭菌感染的报告率。艰难梭菌监测应考虑检测频率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e0a/5823336/14a6476ca180/17-0961-F1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验