Haller Bernhard, Ulm Kurt
Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Trials. 2018 Feb 20;19(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2491-0.
To individualize treatment decisions based on patient characteristics, identification of an interaction between a biomarker and treatment is necessary. Often such potential interactions are analysed using data from randomized clinical trials intended for comparison of two treatments. Tests of interactions are often lacking statistical power and we investigated if and how a consideration of further prognostic variables can improve power and decrease the bias of estimated biomarker-treatment interactions in randomized clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes.
A simulation study was performed to assess how prognostic factors affect the estimate of the biomarker-treatment interaction for a time-to-event outcome, when different approaches, like ignoring other prognostic factors, including all available covariates or using variable selection strategies, are applied. Different scenarios regarding the proportion of censored observations, the correlation structure between the covariate of interest and further potential prognostic variables, and the strength of the interaction were considered.
The simulation study revealed that in a regression model for estimating a biomarker-treatment interaction, the probability of detecting a biomarker-treatment interaction can be increased by including prognostic variables that are associated with the outcome, and that the interaction estimate is biased when relevant prognostic variables are not considered. However, the probability of a false-positive finding increases if too many potential predictors are included or if variable selection is performed inadequately.
We recommend undertaking an adequate literature search before data analysis to derive information about potential prognostic variables and to gain power for detecting true interaction effects and pre-specifying analyses to avoid selective reporting and increased false-positive rates.
为了根据患者特征个体化治疗决策,有必要识别生物标志物与治疗之间的相互作用。通常使用旨在比较两种治疗的随机临床试验数据来分析此类潜在相互作用。相互作用检验往往缺乏统计效力,我们研究了在具有事件发生时间结局的随机临床试验中,考虑更多预后变量是否以及如何能够提高效力并减少估计的生物标志物-治疗相互作用的偏差。
进行了一项模拟研究,以评估当应用不同方法(如忽略其他预后因素、纳入所有可用协变量或使用变量选择策略)时,预后因素如何影响事件发生时间结局的生物标志物-治疗相互作用估计。考虑了关于删失观测值比例、感兴趣的协变量与其他潜在预后变量之间的相关结构以及相互作用强度的不同情景。
模拟研究表明,在用于估计生物标志物-治疗相互作用的回归模型中,纳入与结局相关的预后变量可提高检测生物标志物-治疗相互作用的概率,且不考虑相关预后变量时相互作用估计存在偏差。然而,如果纳入过多潜在预测变量或变量选择执行不当,假阳性发现的概率会增加。
我们建议在数据分析前进行充分的文献检索,以获取有关潜在预后变量的信息,并提高检测真实相互作用效应的效力,同时预先指定分析以避免选择性报告和增加假阳性率。