• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犯错后的心脏活动:犯错后的行为调整涉及心脏活动。

Heart work after errors: Behavioral adjustment following error commission involves cardiac effort.

作者信息

Spruit Iris M, Wilderjans Tom F, van Steenbergen Henk

机构信息

Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg, 52 2333 AK, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Research Group of Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Apr;18(2):375-388. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0576-6.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-018-0576-6
PMID:29464553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5889424/
Abstract

Posterror slowing (PES) is the observation that people respond slower on trials subsequent to error commissions than on trials subsequent to correct responses. Different accounts have been proposed to explain PES. On the one hand, it has been suggested that PES arises from an adaptive increase in cognitive control following error commission, thereby making people more cautious after making an error. On the other hand, PES has been attributed to an orienting response, indicating that attention is shifted toward the error. In the present study we tested these accounts by investigating the effects of error commission in both flanker and switch tasks on two task-evoked cardiac measures: the interbeat interval-that is, the interval between two consecutive R peaks-and the RZ interval-that is, the interval between the R peak and the Z point-as measured using electro- and impedance cardiography, respectively. These measures allowed us to measure cardiac deceleration (autonomic orienting) and cardiac effort mobilization, respectively. Our results revealed a shorter RZ interval during posterror trials, indicating increased effort mobilization following errors. In addition, we replicated earlier studies that have shown cardiac slowing during error trials. However, multilevel analyses showed that only the posterror decrease in RZ interval predicted posterror reaction times, whereas there was no positive relationship between error-related cardiac deceleration and posterror reaction times. Our results suggest that PES is related to increased cardiac effort, supporting a cognitive-control account of PES.

摘要

错误后减缓(PES)是指人们在犯错后的试验中比在正确反应后的试验中反应更慢的现象。人们提出了不同的解释来阐释PES。一方面,有人认为PES源于犯错后认知控制的适应性增强,从而使人们在犯错后更加谨慎。另一方面,PES被归因于一种定向反应,表明注意力转向了错误。在本研究中,我们通过在侧翼任务和切换任务中探究犯错对两种任务诱发的心脏指标的影响来检验这些解释:心跳间期,即两个连续R波峰之间的间期,以及RZ间期,即R波峰与Z点之间的间期,分别通过心电图和阻抗心动图进行测量。这些指标使我们能够分别测量心脏减速(自主定向)和心脏努力动员。我们的结果显示,在错误后的试验中RZ间期更短,表明错误后努力动员增加。此外,我们重复了早期研究,这些研究表明在错误试验期间心脏会减速。然而,多层次分析表明,只有错误后RZ间期的缩短能预测错误后的反应时间,而与错误相关的心脏减速和错误后的反应时间之间没有正相关关系。我们的结果表明,PES与心脏努力增加有关,支持了对PES的认知控制解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9296/5889424/d4f88ff16671/13415_2018_576_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9296/5889424/8439f3769c09/13415_2018_576_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9296/5889424/d4f88ff16671/13415_2018_576_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9296/5889424/8439f3769c09/13415_2018_576_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9296/5889424/d4f88ff16671/13415_2018_576_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Heart work after errors: Behavioral adjustment following error commission involves cardiac effort.犯错后的心脏活动:犯错后的行为调整涉及心脏活动。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Apr;18(2):375-388. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0576-6.
2
False external feedback modulates posterror slowing and the f-P300: implications for theories of posterror adjustment.错误后外部反馈调节错误后减速和 f-P300:对错误后调整理论的启示。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1210-6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0314-y.
3
The Pupillary Orienting Response Predicts Adaptive Behavioral Adjustment after Errors.瞳孔定向反应可预测错误后的适应性行为调整。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0151763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151763. eCollection 2016.
4
How effortful is cognitive control? Insights from a novel method measuring single-trial evoked beta-adrenergic cardiac reactivity.认知控制有多费力?一种新的测量单试诱发β肾上腺素能心脏反应性的方法的见解。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Sep;119:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
5
Error-induced adaptability: Behavioral and neural dynamics of response-stimulus interval modulations on posterror slowing.错误诱发的适应性:反应-刺激间隔调制在后错误减速中的行为和神经动力学。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 May;150(5):851-863. doi: 10.1037/xge0000978. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
Optimizing assessments of post-error slowing: A neurobehavioral investigation of a flanker task.优化对错误后减速的评估:一项关于侧抑制任务的神经行为研究。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Feb;57(2):e13473. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13473. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support.结果预期而非准确性决定了错误后减速:ERP 的支持。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 May;10(2):270-8. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.2.270.
8
Response time distribution parameters show posterror behavioral adjustment in mental arithmetic.反应时间分布参数显示了心算中错误后行为的调整。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 May;186:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
9
Avoiding another mistake: error and posterror neural activity associated with adaptive posterror behavior change.避免另一个错误:与适应性错误后行为改变相关的错误及错误后神经活动。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):317-26. doi: 10.3758/cabn.7.4.317.
10
Testing the bottleneck account for post-error slowing beyond the post-error response.检验错误后反应之外的错误后反应迟缓的瓶颈理论。
Biol Psychol. 2018 Oct;138:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Affective Influences on the Intensity of Mental Effort: 25 Years of Programmatic Research.情感对心理努力强度的影响:25年的系统性研究
Emot Rev. 2025 Jan;17(1):46-63. doi: 10.1177/17540739241303506. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Combining Cardiovascular and Pupil Features Using k-Nearest Neighbor Classifiers to Assess Task Demand, Social Context, and Sentence Accuracy During Listening.结合心血管和瞳孔特征,使用 k-最近邻分类器评估在倾听过程中的任务需求、社会环境和句子准确性。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241232551. doi: 10.1177/23312165241232551.
3
A functional account of stimulation-based aerobic glycolysis and its role in interpreting BOLD signal intensity increases in neuroimaging experiments.

本文引用的文献

1
CLME: An R Package for Linear Mixed Effects Models under Inequality Constraints.CLME:一个用于不等式约束下线性混合效应模型的R包。
J Stat Softw. 2016;75. doi: 10.18637/jss.v075.i01. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
2
Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review.瞳孔扩张作为认知控制任务努力程度的指标:综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2005-2015. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1432-y.
3
Stability and reliability of error-related electromyography over the corrugator supercilii with increasing trials.随着试验次数的增加,皱眉肌肌电图的误差相关性的稳定性和可靠性。
一种基于刺激的有氧糖酵解的功能解释及其在神经影像学实验中解释 BOLD 信号强度增加的作用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Oct;153:105373. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105373. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
4
Is cognitive conflict really effortful? Conflict priming and shielding effects on cardiac response.认知冲突真的需要努力吗?冲突启动和屏蔽效应对心脏反应的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2023 Feb;60(2):e14169. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14169. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
5
On the processing of optimal performances: Studying arousal evoked by being correct and fast.论最佳表现的加工过程:研究因正确且快速而引发的唤醒状态。
Brain Behav. 2021 Jun;11(6):e02162. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2162. Epub 2021 May 7.
6
Situating and extending the sense of should: Reply to comments on "The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure".定位并拓展“应该”之感:对《“应该”之感:一种基于生物学的社会压力建模框架》评论的回应
Phys Life Rev. 2021 Jul;37:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
7
The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure.应该的感觉:一种基于生物学的社会压力建模框架。
Phys Life Rev. 2021 Mar;36:100-136. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
8
The face of control: Corrugator supercilii tracks aversive conflict signals in the service of adaptive cognitive control.控制之面:皱眉肌追踪厌恶冲突信号,以服务于适应性认知控制。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Apr;57(4):e13524. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13524. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.冲突监测与情感信号假说——综合述评。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):193-216. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01668-9.
10
Haptic Aesthetics and Bodily Properties of Ori Gersht's Digital Art: A Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Study.奥里·格什特数字艺术的触觉美学与身体属性:一项行为与眼动追踪研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 7;10:2520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02520. eCollection 2019.
Psychophysiology. 2017 Oct;54(10):1559-1573. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12902. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
4
Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort.迈向对心理努力的理性与机械论解释
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
Psychological and neural mechanisms associated with effort-related cardiovascular reactivity and cognitive control: An integrative approach.与努力相关的心血管反应和认知控制相关的心理和神经机制:一种综合的方法。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Sep;119:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
6
How effortful is cognitive control? Insights from a novel method measuring single-trial evoked beta-adrenergic cardiac reactivity.认知控制有多费力?一种新的测量单试诱发β肾上腺素能心脏反应性的方法的见解。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Sep;119:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
7
Gender Influences on Brain Responses to Errors and Post-Error Adjustments.性别对大脑错误反应及错误后调整的影响。
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 14;6:24435. doi: 10.1038/srep24435.
8
The Pupillary Orienting Response Predicts Adaptive Behavioral Adjustment after Errors.瞳孔定向反应可预测错误后的适应性行为调整。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0151763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151763. eCollection 2016.
9
Error-related electromyographic activity over the corrugator supercilii is associated with neural performance monitoring.皱眉肌上与错误相关的肌电活动与神经性能监测有关。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Feb;53(2):159-70. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12556. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
10
A closer look at cognitive control: differences in resource allocation during updating, inhibition and switching as revealed by pupillometry.深入探究认知控制:通过瞳孔测量法揭示的更新、抑制和转换过程中资源分配的差异。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Sep 10;9:494. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00494. eCollection 2015.