• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

默认立场:优化儿科在医疗决策中的参与。

The Default Position: Optimizing Pediatric Participation in Medical Decision Making.

机构信息

a Seattle Children's Hospital.

b Goldkind Consulting LLC.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2018 Mar;18(3):4-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1418921.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2017.1418921
PMID:29466136
Abstract

Inclusion of children in medical decision making, to the extent of their ability and interest in doing so, should be the default position, ensuring that children are routinely given a voice. However, optimizing the involvement of children in their health care decisions remains challenging for clinicians. Missing from the literature is a stepwise approach to assessing when and how a child should be included in medical decision making. We propose a systematic approach for doing so, and we apply this approach in a discussion of two challenging clinical cases. The approach is informed by a literature review, and is anchored by case studies of teenagers' refusal of clinical care, regulatory requirements for research assent, and the accepted approach to involving cognitively impaired adults in medical decisions.

摘要

在医学决策中纳入儿童,在他们有能力和兴趣的范围内,应该是默认的立场,以确保儿童有常规的发言权。然而,要优化儿童参与其医疗保健决策仍然是临床医生面临的挑战。文献中缺乏一种评估儿童何时以及如何应被纳入医疗决策的逐步方法。我们提出了一种系统的方法,并在对两个具有挑战性的临床案例的讨论中应用了这种方法。该方法的依据是文献综述,并以青少年拒绝临床护理的案例研究、研究同意的监管要求以及涉及认知障碍成年人参与医疗决策的公认方法为基础。

相似文献

1
The Default Position: Optimizing Pediatric Participation in Medical Decision Making.默认立场:优化儿科在医疗决策中的参与。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Mar;18(3):4-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1418921.
2
Pediatric Participation in Medical Decision Making: Optimized or Personalized?儿科患者参与医疗决策:是优化还是个性化?
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Mar;18(3):1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1418931.
3
Involving Minors in Medical Decision Making: Understanding Ethical Issues in Assent and Refusal of Care by Minors.让未成年人参与医疗决策:理解未成年人同意和拒绝治疗中的伦理问题。
Semin Neurol. 2018 Oct;38(5):533-538. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668078. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
4
Consent and assent in paediatric research in low-income settings.低收入环境下儿科研究中的同意与赞成。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 5;15:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-22.
5
Medical decision-making and minors: issues of consent and assent.医疗决策与未成年人:同意和赞成的问题。
Adolescence. 2003 Summer;38(150):343-58.
6
Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: the effects of adolescent gender and research risk.家庭和医生对青少年哮喘研究参与决策的影响:青少年性别与研究风险的作用
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e356-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2589.
7
Ethical Issues Around Pediatric Death: Navigating Consent, Assent, and Disagreement Regarding Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment.儿科死亡相关的伦理问题:在涉及维持生命的医疗治疗时,关于同意、同意表示和意见分歧的处理。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2018 Oct;27(4):539-550. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
8
Does it matter whether physicians' recommendations are given early or late in the decision-making process? An experimental study among patients with schizophrenia.医生的建议在决策过程中给出的早晚有关系吗?一项针对精神分裂症患者的实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 16;6(9):e011282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011282.
9
Informed consent instead of assent is appropriate in children from the age of twelve: Policy implications of new findings on children's competence to consent to clinical research.对于12岁及以上儿童,适用知情同意而非同意:关于儿童同意参与临床研究能力的新发现的政策影响。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 9;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0067-z.
10
Aligning ethics with medical decision-making: the quest for informed patient choice.使伦理与医疗决策保持一致:寻求患者的知情选择。
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Spring;38(1):85-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00469.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the capacity to consent different from the capacity to refuse treatments and procedures in adolescence?在青少年时期,同意的能力与拒绝治疗和程序的能力不同吗?
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2025 Jul-Aug;101(4):501-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2025.04.004. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Pediatric Advance Care Planning and Adolescent Preparedness and Quality of Life: An RCT.儿科预先护理计划与青少年的准备情况及生活质量:一项随机对照试验
Pediatrics. 2025 Feb 1;155(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-068699.
3
Adolescents' healthcare decisional capacity in the clinical context: a theoretical study and model.
青少年在临床环境中的医疗决策能力:一项理论研究与模型
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2025 Mar-Apr;101(2):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
4
Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Medical Decision-Making for Ostomy Surgery in Pediatric IBD: Themes from Focus Groups.儿童炎症性肠病造口手术医疗决策的多学科视角:焦点小组主题
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2025 Jun;32(2):278-285. doi: 10.1007/s10880-024-10036-2. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
5
Pediatric patient engagement in clinical care, research and intervention development: a scoping review.儿科患者参与临床护理、研究和干预措施制定:范围综述。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Mar 29;7(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00566-y.
6
Pediatric Shared Decision-Making for Simple and Complex Decisions: Findings From a Delphi Panel.儿科简单和复杂决策的共享决策:德尔菲小组的研究结果。
Pediatrics. 2022 Nov 1;150(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-057978.
7
Including the voice of paediatric patients: Cocreation of an engagement game.纳入儿科患者的声音:共创参与式游戏。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1861-1871. doi: 10.1111/hex.13530. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
8
Behavioral Management as a Coping Strategy for Managing Stressors in Primates: The Influence of Temperament and Species.行为管理作为灵长类动物应对压力源的一种应对策略:气质和物种的影响。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Mar 10;11(3):423. doi: 10.3390/biology11030423.
9
Chronically ill children's participation and health outcomes in shared decision-making: a scoping review.慢性疾病儿童在共同决策中的参与和健康结果:范围综述。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Aug;180(8):2345-2357. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04055-6. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
Parents' experiences of an e-health intervention implemented in pediatric healthcare: a qualitative study.家长对儿科医疗中电子健康干预措施的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 5;19(1):800. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4643-7.