Anyah Anwuli, Mistry Devin, Kevern Erin, Markiewicz Kenneth
Otolaryngology, Metro Health Hospital - University of Michigan.
Cureus. 2017 Dec 14;9(12):e1945. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1945.
Objectives To determine how long after symptom onset that the average patient with an idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) presents to the otolaryngology clinic. In late presentations, to determine the time to presentation cutoff after which intervention may not be effective. To evaluate the effectiveness of oral steroids versus a combination of oral and intratympanic steroid therapy in late presentations of ISSNHL. Methods and procedures Sixty-four patients met inclusion criteria after chart review of 2,037 patients seen at Metro Health Hospital from 2006 to 2016 for sensorineural hearing loss. All sixty-four patients were used to calculate the average time to presentation, but only 40 were included to evaluate treatment efficacy because 24 were lost to follow-up or declined treatment. Audiograms were analyzed for baseline status and response to treatment. Therapy was either oral steroids or intratympanic (IT) steroids. Thirty-nine of the 40 treated patients received oral steroid therapy. Eighteen of these 39 patients received both oral and IT steroids. One patient received IT steroids only. Results For all 64 patients in the study, the average time to presentation was 55 days, ranging from one day to 240 days. Data for 32 of the 40 treated patients were analyzed. These patients were further divided into smaller groups: Group 1 (N = 11) - treatment within seven days of symptom onset, Group 2 (N = 17) - time to treatment greater than seven days but less than 90 days of symptom onset, and Group 3 (N = 4) - greater than 90 days of symptom onset. In Group 2, there was a significant improvement in pure tone average (P-value: 0.005). Forty-seven percent of patients in this group had objective treatment response utilizing Wilson's criteria. Two patients had a complete recovery and six had a partial recovery. Hearing gains ranged from 10 dB (decibels) to 23 dB. Sixty-three percent of patients with objective improvement also had subjective improvement. In Group 3, none of the patients met Wilson's criteria for recovery. There was no statistically significant difference in response between patients treated with oral steroids only versus a combination of oral and IT steroids. Conclusion Patients with ISSNHL present to an otolaryngologist on average 55 days after symptom onset. There is statistically and clinically significant response to treatment in late presenters. Improvement can be seen up to three months from symptom onset. Oral steroid therapy is effective. IT steroid therapy may have an added benefit.
目的 确定特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失(ISSNHL)患者在症状出现后多久会前往耳鼻喉科诊所就诊。对于就诊较晚的患者,确定就诊时间界限,超过该界限后干预可能无效。评估口服类固醇与口服和鼓室内类固醇联合治疗在ISSNHL就诊较晚患者中的有效性。 方法和程序 对2006年至2016年在地铁健康医院就诊的2037例感音神经性听力损失患者的病历进行审查后,64例患者符合纳入标准。所有64例患者用于计算平均就诊时间,但仅40例纳入评估治疗效果,因为24例失访或拒绝治疗。分析听力图的基线状态和对治疗的反应。治疗方法为口服类固醇或鼓室内(IT)类固醇。40例接受治疗的患者中有39例接受口服类固醇治疗。这39例患者中有18例接受了口服和IT类固醇联合治疗。1例患者仅接受IT类固醇治疗。 结果 研究中的所有64例患者平均就诊时间为55天,范围为1天至240天。对40例接受治疗的患者中的32例数据进行了分析。这些患者进一步分为较小的组:第1组(N = 11) - 症状出现后7天内接受治疗,第2组(N = 17) - 治疗时间大于症状出现后7天但小于90天,第3组(N = 4) - 症状出现后大于90天。在第2组中,纯音平均值有显著改善(P值:0.005)。该组47%的患者根据威尔逊标准有客观治疗反应。2例患者完全康复,6例部分康复。听力增益范围为10分贝(dB)至23 dB。63%有客观改善的患者也有主观改善。在第3组中,没有患者符合威尔逊康复标准。仅接受口服类固醇治疗的患者与接受口服和IT类固醇联合治疗的患者之间的反应没有统计学显著差异。 结论 ISSNHL患者在症状出现后平均55天前往耳鼻喉科医生处就诊。就诊较晚的患者对治疗有统计学和临床显著反应。症状出现后长达三个月可见改善。口服类固醇治疗有效。IT类固醇治疗可能有额外益处。