• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

16项前驱症状问卷韩文版在非求助型大学生群体中的效度验证

Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population.

作者信息

Kim Sung-Wan, Chung Young-Chul, Kang Young-Shin, Kim Jae-Kyeong, Jang Ji-Eun, Jhon Min, Lee Ju-Yeon, Kim Jae-Min, Shin Il-Seon, Yoon Jin-Sang

机构信息

Mindlink, Gwangju Bukgu Community Mental Health Center, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Feb;15(2):111-117. doi: 10.30773/pi.2017.04.24. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

DOI:10.30773/pi.2017.04.24
PMID:29475231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5900395/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (KPQ-16) in non-help-seeking university students.

METHODS

Among 2,246 university students participated in the initial screening, 257 subjects with KPQ-16 scores ≥4 were interviewed. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis of the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. An exploratory modified version of the questionnaire (mKPQ-16), to which three items from the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory were added, was also used to compensate for items on thought and cognitive problems.

RESULTS

Seventeen subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was highest for the mKPQ-16 total score (AUROC=0.831, p<0.001). The use of cutoff total scores of 7 for the mKPQ-16 and 6 for the KPQ-16 resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (76.5% and 64.7%, respectively) and specificity (75.4% and 71.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The Korean versions of the PQ-16 are good instruments for screening for psychosis risk in university students. This validation of a questionnaire version with a small number of items may make it feasible to screen large numbers of young adults in the community.

摘要

目的

检验16项前驱症状问卷韩语版(KPQ - 16)在未寻求帮助的大学生中的信度和效度。

方法

在参与初始筛查的2246名大学生中,对257名KPQ - 16得分≥4的受试者进行访谈。高危精神状态综合评估(CAARMS)的精神病超高危(UHR)标准是诊断的金标准。还使用了问卷的探索性修订版(mKPQ - 16),其中添加了来自埃彭多夫精神分裂症量表的三个项目,以补充关于思维和认知问题的项目。

结果

17名受试者符合CAARMS的精神病UHR标准。mKPQ - 16总分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)最高(AUROC = 0.831,p < 0.001)。mKPQ - 16总分临界值设为7,KPQ - 16总分临界值设为6时,敏感性(分别为76.5%和64.7%)和特异性(分别为75.4%和71.2%)达到最佳平衡。

结论

PQ - 16韩语版是筛查大学生精神病风险的良好工具。这种少量项目问卷版本的验证可能使在社区中筛查大量年轻人成为可行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fa6/5900395/fd9c0be3d051/pi-2017-04-24f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fa6/5900395/fd9c0be3d051/pi-2017-04-24f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fa6/5900395/fd9c0be3d051/pi-2017-04-24f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Korean version of the 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in a Non-Help-Seeking College Population.16项前驱症状问卷韩文版在非求助型大学生群体中的效度验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Feb;15(2):111-117. doi: 10.30773/pi.2017.04.24. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
2
Validation of the Korean Version of the 15-Item Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in a College Population.15项大学生心理体验社区评估量表韩语版在大学生群体中的效度验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2020 Apr;17(4):306-311. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0215. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
3
Validation of the Korean Version of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version in Non-Help-Seeking Individuals.《前驱症状问卷简版韩文版在未寻求帮助个体中的效度验证》
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Feb;16(2):109-114. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.10.23. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4
The validity of the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population.16 项前驱期问卷(PQ-16)中文版在一般求助人群中超高风险发展为精神病的筛查有效性。
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Nov;38(6):1288-96. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs068. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
5
Improving screening methods for psychosis in an adolescent help-seeking population using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Youth Self Report (YSR) versus the Prodromal Questionnaire -16 items version (PQ-16).使用儿童行为量表(CBCL)、青少年自评量表(YSR)与前驱症状问卷16项版本(PQ - 16)改进青少年求助人群中精神病的筛查方法。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022 Mar 31;16(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13034-022-00459-w.
6
The Italian version of the 16-item prodromal questionnaire (iPQ-16): Field-test and psychometric features.16 项前驱症状问卷的意大利语版(iPQ-16):现场测试和心理测量特征。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Sep;199:353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
The Italian version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) and its psychometric features in help-seeking ultra-high-risk subjects and in the general population.意大利版 16 项前驱期问卷(PQ-16)及其在寻求帮助的超高风险人群和一般人群中的心理测量特征。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;18(10):814-827. doi: 10.1111/eip.13516. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
8
Psychometric Properties of Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version among Chinese Help-Seeking Individuals.中国求助者中前驱症状问卷简版的心理测量学特性
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148935. eCollection 2016.
9
[Assessment of mental states at risk of psychotic transition: validation of the French version of the CAARMS].[精神病性转变风险的精神状态评估:CAARMS法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2014 Dec;40(6):447-56. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
10
[Validation of a French version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (fPQ16) in adolescents and young adults seeking help].[针对寻求帮助的青少年和青年成人的16项前驱症状问卷法语版(fPQ16)的验证]
Encephale. 2021 Dec;47(6):547-553. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.11.009. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Internal Validation of the Latvian Version of 16-Item Prodromal Questionnaire in A Help-Seeking Adolescent Population: Psychometric Analysis and Associated Factors.16项前驱症状问卷拉脱维亚语版本在寻求帮助的青少年群体中的内部验证:心理测量分析及相关因素
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;19(1):e13625. doi: 10.1111/eip.13625. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
2
The Unique Contribution of Past Bullying Experiences to the Presence of Psychosis-Like Experiences in University Students.过去受欺凌经历对大学生中类似精神病体验存在的独特影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 28;13:839630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.839630. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Young Patients in the Early Stage of Psychosis.团体认知行为疗法对早期精神病性障碍青年患者的影响。
Psychiatry Investig. 2017 Sep;14(5):609-617. doi: 10.4306/pi.2017.14.5.609. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
Are current labeling terms suitable for people who are at risk of psychosis?当前的标签术语是否适用于有患精神病风险的人?
Schizophr Res. 2017 Oct;188:172-177. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
3
Design and Methodology of the Korean Early Psychosis Cohort Study.韩国早期精神病队列研究的设计与方法
Differential contributions between objective and subjective psychosis-like experiences to suicidal ideation in college students.
客观和主观类精神病样体验对大学生自杀意念的不同贡献。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;16(10):1112-1120. doi: 10.1111/eip.13259. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
4
The Indirect Effect of Trauma via Cognitive Biases and Self-Disturbances on Psychotic-Like Experiences.创伤通过认知偏差和自我干扰对类精神病体验产生的间接影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 29;12:611069. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.611069. eCollection 2021.
5
Deterioration of mental health despite successful control of the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea.尽管韩国成功控制了 COVID-19 大流行,但心理健康状况仍在恶化。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Jan;295:113570. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113570. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Mindlink: A stigma-free youth-friendly community-based early-intervention centre in Korea.心连心:韩国一个无污名、面向青年友好的社区为基础的早期干预中心。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;15(5):1389-1394. doi: 10.1111/eip.13076. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
7
The Impact of Self-Efficacy Analysis-Based Psychological Theory and Literary Ethics on Chinese American Entrepreneurship Education.基于自我效能分析的心理学理论与文学伦理学对美籍华裔创业教育的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 4;11:1870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01870. eCollection 2020.
8
Validation of the Korean Version of the 15-Item Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in a College Population.15项大学生心理体验社区评估量表韩语版在大学生群体中的效度验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2020 Apr;17(4):306-311. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0215. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
9
Negative Life Events and Problematic Internet Use as Factors Associated With Psychotic-Like Experiences in Adolescents.消极生活事件与问题性互联网使用作为青少年类精神病性体验的相关因素
Front Psychiatry. 2019 May 29;10:369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00369. eCollection 2019.
10
Validation of the Korean Version of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version in Non-Help-Seeking Individuals.《前驱症状问卷简版韩文版在未寻求帮助个体中的效度验证》
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Feb;16(2):109-114. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.10.23. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Psychiatry Investig. 2017 Jan;14(1):93-99. doi: 10.4306/pi.2017.14.1.93. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
4
Towards a Standard Psychometric Diagnostic Interview for Subjects at Ultra High Risk of Psychosis: CAARMS versus SIPS.迈向针对超高危精神病患者的标准化心理测量诊断访谈:综合评估高危精神状态量表(CAARMS)与精神状态高危综合征量表(SIPS)的比较
Psychiatry J. 2016;2016:7146341. doi: 10.1155/2016/7146341. Epub 2016 May 30.
5
Assessing self-reported clinical high risk symptoms in community-derived adolescents: A psychometric evaluation of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief.评估社区青少年自我报告的临床高危症状:前驱症状问卷简版的心理测量学评价
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;66:201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
6
Relationship between Erythrocyte Fatty Acid Composition and Psychopathology in the Vienna Omega-3 Study.维也纳欧米伽-3研究中红细胞脂肪酸组成与精神病理学的关系。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0151417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151417. eCollection 2016.
7
Why We Need a Transdiagnostic Staging Approach to Emerging Psychopathology, Early Diagnosis, and Treatment.为何我们需要一种针对新兴精神病理学、早期诊断及治疗的跨诊断分期方法。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;73(3):191-2. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2868.
8
Comprehensive Versus Usual Community Care for First-Episode Psychosis: 2-Year Outcomes From the NIMH RAISE Early Treatment Program.首次发作精神病的综合社区护理与常规社区护理:美国国立精神卫生研究所早期治疗与干预服务提升计划的2年结果
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 1;173(4):362-72. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15050632. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
9
Stigma related to labels and symptoms in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis.与临床高危精神病个体的标签和症状相关的污名化。
Schizophr Res. 2015 Oct;168(1-2):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
10
Age matters in the prevalence and clinical significance of ultra-high-risk for psychosis symptoms and criteria in the general population: Findings from the BEAR and BEARS-kid studies.年龄对普通人群中精神病症状及标准的超高风险的患病率和临床意义有影响:来自BEAR和BEARS-kid研究的结果。
World Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;14(2):189-97. doi: 10.1002/wps.20216.