Division of Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):510-520. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30106-2. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
Systemic adjuvant treatment might mitigate the high risk of disease recurrence in patients with resected stage IIC-III melanoma. The BRIM8 study evaluated adjuvant vemurafenib monotherapy in patients with resected, BRAF mutation-positive melanoma.
BRIM8 was a phase 3, international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study that enrolled 498 adults (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed stage IIC-IIIA-IIIB (cohort 1) or stage IIIC (cohort 2) BRAF mutation-positive melanoma that was fully resected. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by an interactive voice or web response system to receive twice-daily adjuvant oral vemurafenib 960 mg tablets or matching placebo for 52 weeks (13 × 28-day cycles). Randomisation was done by permuted blocks (block size 6) and was stratified by pathological stage and region in cohort 1 and by region in cohort 2. The investigators, patients, and sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, evaluated separately in each cohort. Hierarchical analysis of cohort 2 before cohort 1 was prespecified. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01667419.
The study enrolled 184 patients in cohort 2 (93 were assigned to vemurafenib and 91 to placebo) and 314 patients in cohort 1 (157 were assigned to vemurafenib and 157 to placebo). At the time of data cutoff (April 17, 2017), median study follow-up was 33·5 months (IQR 25·9-41·6) in cohort 2 and 30·8 months (25·5-40·7) in cohort 1. In cohort 2 (patients with stage IIIC disease), median disease-free survival was 23·1 months (95% CI 18·6-26·5) in the vemurafenib group versus 15·4 months (11·1-35·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·80, 95% CI 0·54-1·18; log-rank p=0·26). In cohort 1 (patients with stage IIC-IIIA-IIIB disease) median disease-free survival was not reached (95% CI not estimable) in the vemurafenib group versus 36·9 months (21·4-not estimable) in the placebo group (HR 0·54 [95% CI 0·37-0·78]; log-rank p=0·0010); however, the result was not significant because of the prespecified hierarchical prerequisite for the primary disease-free survival analysis of cohort 2 to show a significant disease-free survival benefit. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 141 (57%) of 247 patients in the vemurafenib group and 37 (15%) of 247 patients in the placebo group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the vemurafenib group were keratoacanthoma (24 [10%] of 247 patients), arthralgia (17 [7%]), squamous cell carcinoma (17 [7%]), rash (14 [6%]), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (14 [6%]), although all keratoacanthoma events and most squamous cell carcinoma events were by default graded as grade 3. In the placebo group, grade 3-4 adverse events did not exceed 2% for any of the reported terms. Serious adverse events were reported in 40 (16%) of 247 patients in the vemurafenib group and 25 (10%) of 247 patients in the placebo group. The most common serious adverse event was basal cell carcinoma, which was reported in eight (3%) patients in each group. One patient in the vemurafenib group of cohort 2 died 2 months after admission to hospital for grade 3 hypertension; however, this death was not considered to be related to the study drug.
The primary endpoint of disease-free survival was not met in cohort 2, and therefore the analysis of cohort 1 showing a numerical benefit in disease-free survival with vemurafenib versus placebo in patients with resected stage IIC-IIIA-IIIB BRAF mutation-positive melanoma must be considered exploratory only. 1 year of adjuvant vemurafenib was well tolerated, but might not be an optimal treatment regimen in this patient population.
F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.
系统辅助治疗可能会降低切除 IIC-III 期黑色素瘤患者疾病复发的高风险。BRIM8 研究评估了辅助维莫非尼单药治疗切除的 BRAF 突变阳性黑色素瘤患者。
BRIM8 是一项国际、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的 3 期研究,共纳入 498 名组织学证实的 IIC-IIIa(队列 1)或 IIIB(队列 2)BRAF 突变阳性黑色素瘤完全切除的成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)。患者通过交互式语音或网络应答系统以 1:1 的比例随机分配,接受每日两次口服辅助维莫非尼 960 mg 片剂或匹配安慰剂,持续 52 周(13×28 天周期)。随机分组采用置换块(块大小 6),并按队列 1 的病理分期和区域以及队列 2 的区域分层。调查人员、患者和赞助商对治疗分配均不知情。主要终点是意向治疗人群的无病生存期,分别在每个队列中进行评估。队列 2 在前队列 1 之前的分层分析是预设的。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01667419。
该研究纳入了队列 2 的 184 名患者(93 名接受维莫非尼治疗,91 名接受安慰剂治疗)和队列 1 的 314 名患者(157 名接受维莫非尼治疗,157 名接受安慰剂治疗)。在数据截止日期(2017 年 4 月 17 日)时,队列 2 的中位研究随访时间为 33.5 个月(IQR 25.9-41.6),队列 1 为 30.8 个月(25.5-40.7)。在队列 2(IIIC 期疾病患者)中,维莫非尼组的中位无病生存期为 23.1 个月(95%CI 18.6-26.5),安慰剂组为 15.4 个月(11.1-35.9)(风险比[HR]0.80,95%CI 0.54-1.18;对数秩检验 p=0.26)。在队列 1(IIC-IIIA-IIIB 期疾病患者)中,维莫非尼组的中位无病生存期未达到(95%CI 无法估计),安慰剂组为 36.9 个月(21.4-无法估计)(HR 0.54[95%CI 0.37-0.78];对数秩检验 p=0.0010);然而,由于队列 2 的主要无病生存分析的分层前提要求显示无病生存获益具有统计学意义,因此该结果不具有统计学意义。维莫非尼组有 141(57%)名患者和安慰剂组有 37(15%)名患者发生 3-4 级不良事件。维莫非尼组最常见的 3-4 级不良事件为角化棘皮瘤(24 例[10%])、关节痛(17 例[7%])、鳞状细胞癌(17 例[7%])、皮疹(14 例[6%])和丙氨酸氨基转移酶升高(14 例[6%]),尽管所有角化棘皮瘤事件和大多数鳞状细胞癌事件默认均为 3 级。安慰剂组中,任何报告的不良事件均未超过 2%。维莫非尼组有 40 名(16%)患者和安慰剂组有 25 名(10%)患者发生严重不良事件。最常见的严重不良事件是基底细胞癌,两组各有 3%的患者发生该疾病。队列 2 的一名维莫非尼组患者因 3 级高血压住院 2 个月后死亡;然而,该死亡被认为与研究药物无关。
队列 2 的无病生存期主要终点未达到,因此队列 1 中显示维莫非尼与安慰剂相比在切除的 IIC-IIIA-IIIB BRAF 突变阳性黑色素瘤患者中无病生存期的数值获益只能被视为探索性的。辅助维莫非尼治疗 1 年的耐受性良好,但在这一患者人群中可能不是最佳治疗方案。
罗氏制药有限公司。