Newcastle University,Newcastle Upon Tyne,UK.
University College London,London,UK.
Psychol Med. 2018 Oct;48(14):2277-2284. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000430. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
The neurobiological understanding of mood, and by extension mood disorders, remains elusive despite decades of research implicating several neuromodulator systems. This review considers a new approach based on existing theories of functional brain organisation. The free energy principle (a.k.a. active inference), and its instantiation in the Bayesian brain, offers a complete and simple formulation of mood. It has been proposed that emotions reflect the precision of - or certainty about - the predicted sensorimotor/interoceptive consequences of action. By extending this reasoning, in a hierarchical setting, we suggest mood states act as (hyper) priors over uncertainty (i.e. emotions). Here, we consider the same computational pathology in the proprioceptive and interoceptive (behavioural and autonomic) domain in order to furnish an explanation for mood disorders. This formulation reconciles several strands of research at multiple levels of enquiry.
尽管数十年来的研究表明有几种神经调质系统与情绪相关,但对情绪,更确切地说是情绪障碍的神经生物学理解仍然难以捉摸。本综述考虑了一种新方法,该方法基于对大脑功能组织现有理论的理解。自由能原理(亦称主动推断)及其在贝叶斯大脑中的体现,为情绪提供了一个完整而简单的表述。有人提出,情绪反映了对行动预测的感觉运动/内脏后果的精确性或确定性。通过扩展这种推理,在分层设置中,我们认为情绪状态充当不确定性(即情绪)的(超)先验。在这里,我们考虑在本体感受和内脏感受(行为和自主)领域中的相同计算病理,以提供对情绪障碍的解释。这种表述在多个研究层面上协调了几条研究线索。