Suppr超能文献

对肺动脉高压患者多普勒超声心动图估算平均肺动脉压可靠性的重新评估:一项来自三级中心比较四种公式的研究

Reappraisal of the reliability of Doppler echocardiographic estimations for mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a study from a tertiary centre comparing four formulae.

作者信息

Kaymaz Cihangir, Akbal Ozgur Yasar, Hakgor Aykun, Tokgoz Hacer Ceren, Tanboga Ibrahim Halil, Aktemur Tugba, Turkday Sevim, Tanyeri Seda, Poci Nertila, Keskin Berhan, Dogan Cem, Bayram Zubeyde, Acar Rezzan Deniz, Ozdemir Nihal

机构信息

1 Department of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

2 Department of Cardiology, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Pulm Circ. 2018 Apr-Jun;8(2):2045894018762270. doi: 10.1177/2045894018762270. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Abstract

Different Doppler echocardiography (DE) models have been proposed for estimation of mean pulmonary arterial pressures (PAMP) from tricuspid regurgitation (TR) jet velocity. We aimed to compare four TR-derived DE models in predicting the PAMP measured by right heart catheterization (RHC) in different groups of precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH). A total of 287 patients with hemodynamically pre-capillary PH were enrolled (mean age = 51 ± 17.4 years, 59.9% female). All patients underwent DE before RHC (< 3 h) and four formulae (F) were used for TR-derived PAMP estimation (PAMP-DE). These were as follows: F1 = Chemla (0.61 × systolic pulmonary artery pressure [PASP] + 2); F2 = Friedberg (0.69 × PASP - 0.22), F3 = Aduen (0.70 × PASP); and F4 = Bech-Hanssen (0.65 × PASP - 1.2). The PASP and PAMP (mmHg) measured by RHC were 89.1 ± 30.4 and 55.8 ± 20.8, respectively. In the overall PH group, DE estimates for PASP (r = 0.59, P = 0.001) and PAMP (r = 0.56, P = 0.001 for all) showed significant correlations with corresponding RHC measures. Concordance was noted between Chemla and Bech-Hanssen, and Aduen and Bech-Hanssen. The Bland-Altman plot showed that Chemla and Bech-Hanssen overestimated and Friedberg and Aduen underestimated PAMP-RHC measures. Paired-t test showed significant systematic biases for Aduen and Bech-Hanssen while Passing-Bablok non-parametric analysis revealed significant systematic biases all four PAMP-DE estimates. There was poor agreement between PAMP-RHC measures and PAMP-DE deciles (Kappa values were 0.112, 0.097, 0.095, and 0.121, respectively). This study showed a poor agreement between PAMP-DE estimates by four TR-derived formulae and PAMP-RHC in patients with PH, regardless of the etiology. However, these results can not be fully extrapolated to a normal population and did not address the reliability of DE estimates for PH screening procedures.

摘要

已经提出了不同的多普勒超声心动图(DE)模型,用于根据三尖瓣反流(TR)射流速度估计平均肺动脉压(PAMP)。我们旨在比较四种基于TR的DE模型在预测不同组毛细血管前肺动脉高压(PH)患者中通过右心导管检查(RHC)测量的PAMP方面的表现。总共纳入了287例血流动力学为毛细血管前PH的患者(平均年龄=51±17.4岁,女性占59.9%)。所有患者在RHC之前(<3小时)接受了DE检查,并使用四个公式(F)来估计基于TR的PAMP(PAMP-DE)。具体如下:F1 = Chemla公式(0.61×收缩期肺动脉压[PASP]+2);F2 = Friedberg公式(0.69×PASP - 0.22),F3 = Aduen公式(0.70×PASP);F4 = Bech-Hanssen公式(0.65×PASP - 1.2)。通过RHC测量的PASP和PAMP(mmHg)分别为89.1±30.4和55.8±20.8。在整个PH组中,DE对PASP(r = 0.59,P = 0.001)和PAMP(r = 0.56,P均= 0.001)的估计与相应的RHC测量值显示出显著相关性。注意到Chemla公式和Bech-Hanssen公式之间、Aduen公式和Bech-Hanssen公式之间具有一致性。Bland-Altman图显示,Chemla公式和Bech-Hanssen公式高估了PAMP-RHC测量值,而Friedberg公式和Aduen公式低估了该测量值。配对t检验显示Aduen公式和Bech-Hanssen公式存在显著的系统偏差,而Passing-Bablok非参数分析显示所有四个PAMP-DE估计值均存在显著的系统偏差。PAMP-RHC测量值与PAMP-DE十分位数之间的一致性较差(Kappa值分别为0.112、0.097、0.095和0.121)。本研究表明,无论病因如何,四种基于TR的公式对PAMP的DE估计值与PH患者的PAMP-RHC之间的一致性较差。然而,这些结果不能完全外推至正常人群,且未涉及DE估计值在PH筛查程序中的可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de52/5865458/299f13beaa2f/10.1177_2045894018762270-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验