Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, 1227 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 19;373(1744). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0170.
Major routes to identifying individual differences (in diverse species) include studies of behaviour patterns as represented in language and neurophysiology. But results from these approaches appear not to converge on some major dimensions. Identifying dimensions of human variation least applicable to non-human species may help to partition human-specific individual differences of recent evolutionary origin from those shared across species. Human culture includes learned, enforced social-norm systems that are symbolically reinforced and referenced in displays signalling adherence. At a key juncture in human evolution bullying aggression and deception-based cheating apparently became censured in the language of a moral community, enabling mutual observation coordinated in gossip, associated with external sanctions. That still-conserved cultural paradigm moralistically regulates selfish advantage-taking, with shared semantics and explicit rules. Ethics and moral codes remain critical and universal components of human culture and have a stronger imprint in language than most aspects of the currently popular Big-Five taxonomy, a model that sets out five major lines of individual-differences variation in human personality. In other species (e.g. chimpanzees), human observers might see apparent individual differences in morality-relevant traits, but not because the animals have human-analogue sanctioning systems. Removing the moral dimension of personality and other human-specific manifestations (e.g. religion) may aid in identifying those other bases of individual differences more ubiquitous across species.This article is part of the theme issue 'Diverse perspectives on diversity: multi-disciplinary approaches to taxonomies of individual differences'.
确定个体差异(在不同物种中)的主要途径包括研究语言和神经生理学中表现出的行为模式。但是,这些方法的结果似乎并没有集中在一些主要维度上。确定与非人类物种相关性最小的人类变异维度,可能有助于将最近进化起源的人类特有的个体差异与跨物种共享的个体差异区分开来。人类文化包括习得的、强制执行的社会规范系统,这些系统在信号表示遵守的符号强化和引用中得到加强。在人类进化的关键节点上,欺凌攻击和基于欺骗的作弊行为显然在道德社区的语言中受到谴责,从而使相互观察得以协调,通过八卦进行交流,并与外部制裁相关联。这种仍然存在的文化范式从道德上规范了自私的优势获取,具有共同的语义和明确的规则。伦理学和道德规范仍然是人类文化的关键和普遍组成部分,在语言中的印记比目前流行的五大人格分类模型的大多数方面都要强,该模型阐述了人类个性的五个主要个体差异变化线。在其他物种(如黑猩猩)中,人类观察者可能会看到与道德相关特征的明显个体差异,但这并不是因为动物具有类似人类的制裁系统。去除人格的道德维度和其他人类特有的表现形式(如宗教)可能有助于确定其他更普遍存在于物种间的个体差异基础。本文是主题为“多样性的多学科视角:个体差异分类学”的一部分。