• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格术语习得年龄:对人格理论的启示

Age of Acquisition of Personality Terms: Implications for Personality Theory.

作者信息

Roivainen Eka

机构信息

Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Psychol. 2022 May 31;18(2):132-141. doi: 10.5964/ejop.2987. eCollection 2022 May.

DOI:10.5964/ejop.2987
PMID:36348698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9632550/
Abstract

Analysis of the age of acquisition (AoA) of personality terms represents a genetic method for the study of the individual personality lexicon and offers a potential alternative to correlational analysis for identifying the fundamental personality descriptors among the thousands of terms that appear in language. In the present study, the relationship between AoA, word frequency, word desirability, and factor loading in the Big Five and Hexaco models of 274 and 408 personality adjectives was analyzed. It was found that young children (2nd graders or younger) acquire personality terms that represent traits at the core of the broad personality factors in the Big Five and Hexaco models slightly earlier than words that represent more peripheral traits. In older children beyond second grade, the correlation between factor loading and AoA is weak. Words that describe the broad openness and stability/emotionality aspects of personality are learned later than words for the other broad factors. Word frequency (in book texts) and desirability have a weak negative correlation with AoA. It is hypothesized that the AoA of a personality term reflects the importance of the corresponding trait for children and may be used as one criterion for ranking facet level traits independent of the broad factors.

摘要

对人格特质术语习得年龄(AoA)的分析代表了一种研究个体人格词汇的遗传学方法,并且为在语言中出现的数千个术语中识别基本人格描述词提供了一种替代相关分析的潜在方法。在本研究中,分析了274个和408个人格形容词在大五人格模型和六因素人格模型中习得年龄、词频、词合意性与因素负荷之间的关系。研究发现,幼儿(二年级及以下)习得代表大五人格模型和六因素人格模型中宽泛人格因素核心特质的人格特质术语,比习得代表更外围特质的术语略早。在二年级以上的大龄儿童中,因素负荷与习得年龄之间的相关性较弱。描述人格宽泛开放性和稳定性/情绪性方面的词汇比描述其他宽泛因素的词汇习得更晚。词频(在书籍文本中)和合意性与习得年龄呈弱负相关。据推测,人格特质术语的习得年龄反映了相应特质对儿童的重要性,并且可作为独立于宽泛因素对层面特质进行排序的一个标准。

相似文献

1
Age of Acquisition of Personality Terms: Implications for Personality Theory.人格术语习得年龄:对人格理论的启示
Eur J Psychol. 2022 May 31;18(2):132-141. doi: 10.5964/ejop.2987. eCollection 2022 May.
2
The Big Five Factor Marker Adjectives Are Not Especially Popular Words. Are They Superior Descriptors?大五因素标记形容词并非特别常见的词汇。它们是更优的描述词吗?
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Dec;49(4):590-9. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9311-9.
3
Personality and Affective Correlates of Openness to Experience from Big Five and HEXACO Personality Models: The Dual Nature of Big Five Openness.大五人格和 HEXACO 人格模型对经验开放性的人格和情感相关性:大五开放性的双重本质。
J Pers Assess. 2023 Jul-Aug;105(4):544-554. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2117047. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
4
Taxonomy and structure of the Romanian personality lexicon.罗马尼亚语人格词汇的分类与结构。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Jun;54(3):377-387. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12464. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
5
Is it time to replace the Big Five personality model? Factorial structure of the NEO PI-R in a community sample of Spanish adults.是否到了取代大五人格模型的时候了?西班牙成年人社区样本中 NEO PI-R 的因子结构。
J Gen Psychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;151(3):335-356. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2023.2261136. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
6
Age of acquisition ratings score better on criterion validity than frequency trajectory or ratings "corrected" for frequency.习得年龄评分在效标效度方面比频率轨迹或针对频率“校正”的评分表现更好。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jul;70(7):1129-1139. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1172097. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
8
Using the Big Five Aspect Scales to translate between the HEXACO and Big Five personality models.使用大五人格维度量表在 HEXACO 和大五人格模型之间进行转换。
J Pers. 2019 Oct;87(5):1025-1038. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12453. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
9
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
Ratings of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages: Is there a cross-linguistic order of words?25种语言中299个单词的习得年龄评级:是否存在跨语言的词汇顺序?
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1154-77. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6.

本文引用的文献

1
High-dimensionality personality structure in the natural language: Further analyses of classic sets of English-language trait-adjectives.自然语言中的高维人格结构:对经典英语特质形容词集的进一步分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Nov;119(5):1188-1219. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000273. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
2
Italian Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Words (ItAoA).大量词汇的意大利语习得年龄规范(ItAoA)。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 13;10:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00278. eCollection 2019.
3
Time to Move Beyond the Big Five?是时候超越“大五人格”了吗?
Eur J Pers. 2016 Jul-Aug;30(4):311-312. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
4
Culture, morality and individual differences: comparability and incomparability across species.文化、道德与个体差异:物种间的可比性与不可比性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 19;373(1744). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0170.
5
Taxonomies of psychological individual differences: biological perspectives on millennia-long challenges.心理个体差异的分类学:对千年挑战的生物学视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 19;373(1744). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0152.
6
A New Twist on Old Questions: A Life Span Approach to the Trait Concept.新视角下的老问题:从毕生发展的角度看特质概念。
J Pers. 2018 Feb;86(1):97-108. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12304. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
7
Test-based age-of-acquisition norms for 44 thousand English word meanings.基于测试的44000个英语词义的习得年龄规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1520-1523. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0811-4.
8
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.HEXACO人格量表的心理测量特性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
9
The Big Five Factor Marker Adjectives Are Not Especially Popular Words. Are They Superior Descriptors?大五因素标记形容词并非特别常见的词汇。它们是更优的描述词吗?
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Dec;49(4):590-9. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9311-9.
10
First learned words are not forgotten: Age-of-acquisition effects in the tip-of-the-tongue experience.最先学会的单词不会被遗忘:舌尖现象中的习得年龄效应。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Oct;43(7):1085-103. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0525-3.