Taylor Deanna J, Smith Nicholas D, Binns Alison M, Crabb David P
Division of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;256(4):815-821. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3879-3. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
There is a well-established research base surrounding face recognition in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, much of this existing research does not differentiate between results obtained for 'wet' AMD and 'dry' AMD. Here, we test the hypothesis that face recognition performance is worse in patients with dry AMD compared with visually healthy peers.
Patients (>60 years of age, logMAR binocular visual acuity 0.7 or better) with dry AMD of varying severity and visually healthy age-related peers (controls) completed a modified version of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT). Percentage of correctly identified faces was used as an outcome measure for performance for each participant. A 90% normative reference limit was generated from the distribution of CFMT scores recorded in the visually healthy controls. Scores for AMD participants were then specifically compared to this limit, and comparisons between average scores in the AMD severity groups were investigated.
Thirty patients (median [interquartile range] age of 76 [70, 79] years) and 34 controls (median age of 70 [64, 75] years) were examined. Four, seventeen and nine patients were classified as having early, intermediate and late AMD (geographic atrophy) respectively. Five (17%) patients recorded a face recognition performance worse than the 90% limit (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.46) set by controls; four of these had geographic atrophy. Patients with geographic atrophy identified fewer faces on average (±SD) (61% ± 22%) than those with early and intermediate AMD (75 ± 11%) and controls (74% ± 11%).
People with dry AMD may not suffer from problems with face recognition until the disease is in its later stages; those with late AMD (geographic atrophy) are likely to have difficulty recognising faces. The results from this study should influence the management and expectations of patients with dry AMD in both community practice and hospital clinics.
围绕年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者的面部识别已经建立了完善的研究基础。然而,现有的许多研究并未区分“湿性”AMD和“干性”AMD所获得的结果。在此,我们检验以下假设:与视力正常的同龄人相比,干性AMD患者的面部识别能力更差。
不同严重程度的干性AMD患者(年龄>60岁,双眼对数最小分辨角视力为0.7或更好)以及视力正常的年龄相关同龄人(对照组)完成了改良版的剑桥面部记忆测试(CFMT)。正确识别面部的百分比用作每个参与者表现的结果指标。根据视力正常对照组记录的CFMT分数分布生成90%的正常参考限值。然后将AMD参与者的分数与该限值进行具体比较,并研究AMD严重程度组平均分数之间的差异。
检查了30例患者(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为76[70,79]岁)和34例对照组(年龄中位数为70[64,75]岁)。分别有4例、17例和9例患者被分类为患有早期、中期和晚期AMD(地图样萎缩)。5例(17%)患者的面部识别表现低于对照组设定的90%限值(Fisher精确检验,p = 0.46);其中4例患有地图样萎缩。与早期和中期AMD患者(75±11%)及对照组(74%±11%)相比,地图样萎缩患者平均识别出的面部较少(±标准差)(61%±22%)。
干性AMD患者在疾病晚期之前可能不会出现面部识别问题;晚期AMD(地图样萎缩)患者可能难以识别面部。本研究结果应会影响社区实践和医院门诊中干性AMD患者的管理和预期。