• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用监督机器学习预测中心静脉导管相关血流感染和死亡率。

Predicting central line-associated bloodstream infections and mortality using supervised machine learning.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, USA.

Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2018 Jun;45:156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.02.010
PMID:29486341
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare machine learning techniques for predicting central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III database was queried for all ICU admissions. The variables included six different severities of illness scores calculated on the first day of ICU admission with their components and comorbidities. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, central line placement, and CLABSI. Predictive models were created for these outcomes using classifiers with different algorithms: logistic regression, gradient boosted trees, and deep learning.

RESULTS

There were 57,786 total hospital admissions and the mortality rate was 10.1%. There were 38.4% patients with a central line and the rate of CLABSI was 1.5%. The classifiers using deep learning performed with the highest AUC for mortality, 0.885±0.010 (p<0.01) and central line placement, 0.816±0.006 (p<0.01). The classifier using logistic regression for predicting CLABSI performed with an AUC of 0.722±0.048 (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates models for identifying patients who will develop CLABSI. Early identification of these patients has implications for quality, cost, and outcome improvements.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较用于预测中心静脉导管相关性血流感染(CLABSI)的机器学习技术。

材料与方法

从重症监护多参数智能监测 III 数据库中查询所有 ICU 入院患者的信息。纳入的变量包括 ICU 入院第一天计算的六种不同严重程度的疾病评分及其组成部分和合并症。感兴趣的结局包括院内死亡率、中心静脉导管置管和 CLABSI。使用具有不同算法的分类器(逻辑回归、梯度提升树和深度学习)为这些结局创建预测模型。

结果

共有 57786 例住院患者,死亡率为 10.1%。有 38.4%的患者有中心静脉导管,CLABSI 的发生率为 1.5%。使用深度学习的分类器在死亡率(AUC=0.885±0.010,p<0.01)和中心静脉导管置管(AUC=0.816±0.006,p<0.01)方面的表现最佳。使用逻辑回归预测 CLABSI 的分类器的 AUC 为 0.722±0.048(p<0.01)。

结论

本研究展示了用于识别可能发生 CLABSI 的患者的模型。早期识别这些患者对改善质量、降低成本和改善结局具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Predicting central line-associated bloodstream infections and mortality using supervised machine learning.使用监督机器学习预测中心静脉导管相关血流感染和死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2018 Jun;45:156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
Using artificial intelligence to predict prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy placement.利用人工智能预测机械通气延长及气管切开术的实施情况。
J Surg Res. 2018 Aug;228:179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
3
The influence of intensive care unit-acquired central line-associated bloodstream infection on in-hospital mortality: A single-center risk-adjusted analysis.重症监护病房获得性中心静脉导管相关血流感染对院内死亡率的影响:一项单中心风险调整分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2016 May 1;44(5):587-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
4
Inpatient costs, mortality and 30-day re-admission in patients with central-line-associated bloodstream infections.中心静脉相关血流感染患者的住院费用、死亡率和 30 天再入院率。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 May;20(5):O318-24. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12407. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
5
Risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infection in pediatric intensive care units.儿科重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关血流感染的危险因素。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;31(10):1049-56. doi: 10.1086/656246.
6
A Model to Predict Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Among Patients With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: The MPC Score.一种预测外周置入中心静脉导管患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染的模型:MPC 评分。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;38(10):1155-1166. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.167. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
7
Attributable mortality of central line associated bloodstream infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.中心静脉导管相关血流感染的归因死亡率:系统评价与荟萃分析
Infection. 2015 Feb;43(1):29-36. doi: 10.1007/s15010-014-0689-y. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
8
Central line-associated bloodstream infection in neonatal intensive care units.中心静脉导管相关性血流感染于新生儿重症监护病房。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;34(11):1167-73. doi: 10.1086/673464. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
9
Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis.外周置入中心静脉导管与中心静脉导管相比,与儿科重症监护患者的血流感染风险较低:一项倾向调整分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1097-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
10
Risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infections in the era of best practice.最佳实践时代下中心静脉导管相关血流感染的危险因素。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 May;72(5):1174-80. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824d1085.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Managing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) for Patient Safety and Quality of Care.人工智能在管理中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)以保障患者安全和护理质量方面的作用。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Sep 3;18:2887-2898. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S520035. eCollection 2025.
2
Predicting peripheral venous catheter related phlebitis using machine learning (PPML): development and prospective validation of PPML for cardiology inpatients.使用机器学习预测外周静脉导管相关静脉炎(PPML):PPML在心脏病住院患者中的开发与前瞻性验证
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03158-6.
3
Early detection of vascular catheter-associated infections employing supervised machine learning - a case study in Lleida region.
采用监督式机器学习早期检测血管导管相关感染——莱里达地区的案例研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03113-5.
4
Prediction of bloodstream infection using machine learning based primarily on biochemical data.主要基于生化数据,使用机器学习预测血流感染。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 20;15(1):17478. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01821-6.
5
What's new in critical illness and injury science? Keeping up with Moore's law - Are we ready for the intensive care units of tomorrow?危重病与创伤科学有哪些新进展?紧跟摩尔定律——我们为明日的重症监护病房做好准备了吗?
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2025 Jan-Mar;15(1):1-3. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_27_25. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
6
Enhancing Infection Control in ICUS Through AI: A Literature Review.通过人工智能加强重症监护病房的感染控制:文献综述
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;8(1):e70288. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70288. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Predictive modelling of hospital-acquired infection in acute ischemic stroke using machine learning.使用机器学习对急性缺血性卒中患者医院获得性感染进行预测建模
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82280-3.
8
Leveraging explainable artificial intelligence for early prediction of bloodstream infections using historical electronic health records.利用可解释人工智能通过历史电子健康记录对血流感染进行早期预测。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Nov 14;3(11):e0000506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000506. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Machine learning for predicting device-associated infection and 30-day survival outcomes after invasive device procedure in intensive care unit patients.机器学习预测重症监护病房患者侵袭性器械操作后器械相关感染和 30 天生存结局。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 10;14(1):23726. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74585-0.
10
Harnessing of Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Systematic Review.利用人工智能诊断和预防医院获得性感染:一项系统综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;14(5):484. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050484.