Benedetto Simone, Caldato Christian, Bazzan Elia, Greenwood Darren C, Pensabene Virginia, Actis Paolo
TSW XP Lab, Treviso, Italy.
Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0192691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192691. eCollection 2018.
Fitness trackers are devices or applications for monitoring and tracking fitness-related metrics such as distance walked or run, calorie consumption, quality of sleep and heart rate. Since accurate heart rate monitoring is essential in fitness training, the objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of the Fitbit Charge 2 for measuring heart rate with respect to a gold standard electrocardiograph. Fifteen healthy participants were asked to ride a stationary bike for 10 minutes and their heart rate was simultaneously recorded from each device. Results showed that the Fitbit Charge 2 underestimates the heart rate. Although the mean bias in measuring heart rate was a modest -5.9 bpm (95% CI: -6.1 to -5.6 bpm), the limits of agreement, which indicate the precision of individual measurements, between the Fitbit Charge 2 and criterion measure were wide (+16.8 to -28.5 bpm) indicating that an individual heart rate measure could plausibly be underestimated by almost 30 bpm.
健身追踪器是用于监测和跟踪与健身相关指标的设备或应用程序,这些指标包括步行或跑步的距离、卡路里消耗、睡眠质量和心率。由于准确的心率监测在健身训练中至关重要,本研究的目的是评估Fitbit Charge 2相对于金标准心电图仪测量心率的准确性和精确性。15名健康参与者被要求骑固定自行车10分钟,并同时从每个设备记录他们的心率。结果表明,Fitbit Charge 2低估了心率。虽然测量心率的平均偏差为适度的-5.9次/分钟(95%置信区间:-6.1至-5.6次/分钟),但Fitbit Charge 2与标准测量之间的一致性界限(表明个体测量的精确性)很宽(+16.8至-28.5次/分钟),这表明个体心率测量可能会被低估近30次/分钟。