School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0193478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193478. eCollection 2018.
The Professional Quality of Life scale is a measure intended to provide practitioners and researchers with an indication of a caring professional's compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. While this measure has been used extensively in nursing research, owing to the relevancy of patient-care associated satisfaction and fatigue within this profession, information regarding the construct validity of this measure is less well represented in the literature. We examined the construct validity of the Professional Quality of Life scale using a Rasch analysis procedure on each of its three scales, as a means of substantiating their measurement adequacy. Responses on the Professional Quality of Life scale from 1615 registered nurses (age x̅ = 46.48 years, SD = 11.78) were analysed. While support for the measurement adequacy (invariance, person/item fit, and unidimensionality) of the compassion satisfaction scale was found, the burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales did not demonstrate adequate measurement properties. We instead present an alternative measurement model of these subscales, involving items from each, to form a robust measure of compassion fatigue, and provide recoding, scoring, and normed scores for both measures. Our findings indicate that use of the Professional Quality of Life scale's burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales may require caution, while our revised compassion satisfaction and fatigue scales provide robust measurement options for practitioners and researchers.
专业生活质量量表是一种旨在为从业者和研究人员提供关怀专业人员同情心满足、倦怠和二次创伤应激指标的测量工具。虽然该量表在护理研究中得到了广泛应用,因为在这个职业中与患者护理相关的满意度和疲劳感具有相关性,但关于该量表结构效度的信息在文献中则较少体现。我们使用 Rasch 分析程序对其三个分量表中的每一个进行了结构效度检验,以此来证明其测量充分性。对 1615 名注册护士(年龄 x̅ = 46.48 岁,SD = 11.78)的专业生活质量量表的反应进行了分析。虽然支持了同情心满足量表的测量充分性(不变性、人与项目拟合度和单维性),但倦怠和二次创伤应激量表则没有表现出足够的测量特性。我们提出了这些子量表的替代测量模型,涉及每个子量表的项目,以形成一个强大的同情疲劳测量工具,并为这两个测量工具提供重新编码、评分和规范分数。我们的研究结果表明,在使用专业生活质量量表的倦怠和二次创伤应激量表时需要谨慎,而我们修订的同情心满足和疲劳量表则为从业者和研究人员提供了可靠的测量选择。