• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对儿童保育工作人员的工作场所健康与安全干预措施:CARE整群随机对照试验的原理、设计及基线结果

Workplace health and safety intervention for child care staff: Rationale, design, and baseline results from the CARE cluster randomized control trial.

作者信息

Ward Dianne S, Vaughn Amber E, Hales Derek, Viera Anthony J, Gizlice Ziya, Bateman Lori A, Grummon Anna H, Arandia Gabriela, Linnan Laura A

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 245 Rosenau Hall, CB 7461, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7461, USA; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1700 Martin L. King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7426, USA.

Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1700 Martin L. King Jr. Blvd., Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7426, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 May;68:116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2018.02.018
PMID:29501740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5944351/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-wage workers suffer disproportionately high rates of chronic disease and are important targets for workplace health and safety interventions. Child care centers offer an ideal opportunity to reach some of the lowest paid workers, but these settings have been ignored in workplace intervention studies.

METHODS

Caring and Reaching for Health (CARE) is a cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating efficacy of a multi-level, workplace-based intervention set in child care centers that promotes physical activity and other health behaviors among staff. Centers are randomized (1:1) into the Healthy Lifestyles (intervention) or the Healthy Finances (attention control) program. Healthy Lifestyles is delivered over six months including a kick-off event and three 8-week health campaigns (magazines, goal setting, behavior monitoring, tailored feedback, prompts, center displays, director coaching). The primary outcome is minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA); secondary outcomes are health behaviors (diet, smoking, sleep, stress), physical assessments (body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, fitness), and workplace supports for health and safety.

RESULTS

In total, 56 centers and 553 participants have been recruited and randomized. Participants are predominately female (96.7%) and either Non-Hispanic African American (51.6%) or Non-Hispanic White (36.7%). Most participants (63.4%) are obese. They accumulate 17.4 (±14.2) minutes/day of MVPA and consume 1.3 (±1.4) and 1.3 (±0.8) servings/day of fruits and vegetables, respectively. Also, 14.2% are smokers; they report 6.4 (±1.4) hours/night of sleep; and 34.9% are high risk for depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline data demonstrate several serious health risks, confirming the importance of workplace interventions in child care.

摘要

背景

低薪工人患慢性病的比例过高,是工作场所健康与安全干预措施的重要目标人群。儿童保育中心为接触一些收入最低的工人提供了理想机会,但这些场所却在工作场所干预研究中被忽视。

方法

关爱健康(CARE)是一项整群随机对照试验,评估在儿童保育中心开展的多层次、基于工作场所的干预措施的效果,该干预措施旨在促进工作人员的身体活动及其他健康行为。各中心被随机(1:1)分为健康生活方式(干预组)或健康财务(注意力对照组)项目。健康生活方式项目为期六个月,包括启动活动和三次为期八周的健康活动(杂志、目标设定、行为监测、个性化反馈、提示、中心展示、主任指导)。主要结局指标是中等强度和剧烈身体活动(MVPA)的分钟数;次要结局指标是健康行为(饮食、吸烟、睡眠、压力)、身体评估(体重指数(BMI)、腰围、血压、体能)以及工作场所对健康与安全的支持。

结果

总共招募并随机分配了56个中心和553名参与者。参与者主要为女性(96.7%),非西班牙裔非裔美国人(51.6%)或非西班牙裔白人(36.7%)。大多数参与者(63.4%)肥胖。他们每天的MVPA累计时间为17.4(±14.2)分钟,每天分别摄入1.3(±1.4)份和1.3(±0.8)份水果和蔬菜。此外,14.2%的人吸烟;他们报告每晚睡眠6.4(±1.4)小时;34.9%的人有抑郁高风险。

结论

基线数据显示了几种严重的健康风险,证实了在儿童保育场所开展工作场所干预措施的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/010f/5944351/c9b580195088/nihms962435f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/010f/5944351/677cb2757088/nihms962435f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/010f/5944351/316c757f23ba/nihms962435f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/010f/5944351/c9b580195088/nihms962435f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/010f/5944351/677cb2757088/nihms962435f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/010f/5944351/316c757f23ba/nihms962435f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/010f/5944351/c9b580195088/nihms962435f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Workplace health and safety intervention for child care staff: Rationale, design, and baseline results from the CARE cluster randomized control trial.针对儿童保育工作人员的工作场所健康与安全干预措施:CARE整群随机对照试验的原理、设计及基线结果
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 May;68:116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
2
Results of caring and reaching for health (CARE): a cluster-randomized controlled trial assessing a worksite wellness intervention for child care staff.关爱与追求健康的结果(CARE):一项评估儿童保育工作者工作场所健康干预措施的集群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 May 15;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00968-x.
3
Development of a Workplace Intervention for Child Care Staff: Caring and Reaching for Health's (CARE) Healthy Lifestyles Intervention.为儿童保育工作人员开发的工作场所干预措施:关爱与追求健康(CARE)健康生活方式干预
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Mar;21(2):277-287. doi: 10.1177/1524839918786214. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
4
App-technology to improve lifestyle behaviors among working adults - the Health Integrator study, a randomized controlled trial.应用技术改善工作成年人的生活方式行为 - 健康整合器研究,一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 7;19(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6595-6.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Effectiveness of a Worksite Intervention for Male Construction Workers on Dietary and Physical Activity Behaviors, Body Mass Index, and Health Outcomes: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对男性建筑工人的工作场所干预措施对饮食和身体活动行为、体重指数及健康结果的有效性:一项随机对照试验的结果
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):795-805. doi: 10.1177/0890117117694450. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
7
Efficacy of a workplace osteoporosis prevention intervention: a cluster randomized trial.工作场所骨质疏松症预防干预措施的效果:一项整群随机试验
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3506-y.
8
The Working Healthy Project: a worksite health-promotion trial targeting physical activity, diet, and smoking.健康工作项目:一项针对身体活动、饮食和吸烟的工作场所健康促进试验。
J Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jul;41(7):545-55. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199907000-00003.
9
A blended intervention to promote physical activity, health and work productivity among office employees using intervention mapping: a study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项使用干预映射法促进办公室员工身体活动、健康和工作效率的混合干预措施:一项群组随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 25;20(1):994. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09128-z.
10
Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity.改善针对烟草、酒精、饮食、身体活动和肥胖的工作场所政策或措施实施情况的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD012439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012439.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
What determines childcare workers physical behaviours at work? An investigation of determinants at the institution, team, and worker levels in Danish day nurseries.是什么决定了儿童保育员在工作中的身体行为?对丹麦日托中心机构、团队和员工层面的决定因素进行的调查。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2025 Jun 30;69(5):520-530. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf016.
2
Predictors of Overweight and Obesity in Early Care and Education Teachers during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间早期护理与教育教师超重和肥胖的预测因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;20(3):2763. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032763.
3
A cluster-randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a nutrition intervention on dietary behaviors among early care and education providers: The Create Healthy Futures study.

本文引用的文献

1
National Sleep Foundation's sleep quality recommendations: first report.国家睡眠基金会的睡眠质量建议:第一份报告。
Sleep Health. 2017 Feb;3(1):6-19. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
2
The Health and Working Conditions of Women Employed in Child Care.从事儿童保育工作的女性的健康与工作条件。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 9;14(3):283. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030283.
3
Family child care home providers as role models for children: Cause for concern?家庭托儿所提供者作为儿童的榜样:值得担忧吗?
一项评估营养干预对早期护理和教育提供者饮食行为影响的整群随机对照试验:创建健康未来研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jun 27;28:101873. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101873. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Does Childcare Work Promote Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Health? A Cross-Sectional Study of Danish Childcare Workers Based on Accelerometry and Heart Rate Measurements.儿童保育工作是否促进心肺健康?基于加速度计和心率测量的丹麦儿童保育工作者的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 27;18(23):12496. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312496.
5
Physical Activity, Physical Well-Being, and Psychological Well-Being: Associations with Life Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Early Childhood Educators.身体活动、身体和心理健康与新冠疫情期间幼儿教育工作者生活满意度的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 7;18(18):9430. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189430.
6
Stress interventions and hypertension in Black women.黑人女性的压力干预与高血压。
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211009751. doi: 10.1177/17455065211009751.
7
Implementation of a workplace physical activity intervention in child care: process evaluation results from the Care2BWell trial.在儿童保育机构实施工作场所身体活动干预措施:Care2BWell试验的过程评估结果
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):1430-1440. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab034.
8
Can Childcare Work Be Designed to Promote High Intensity Physical Activity for Improved Fitness and Health? A Proof of Concept Study of the Goldilocks Principle.儿童保育工作能否通过设计来促进高强度的身体活动,以提高健康和体能?金氏原则的概念验证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 12;17(20):7419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207419.
9
Workplace-based opportunities to support child care workers' health and safety.基于工作场所的机会,以支持儿童保育工作者的健康与安全。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Jun 30;19:101154. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101154. eCollection 2020 Sep.
10
Physical Work Demands of Childcare Workers in Denmark: Device-Based Measurements and Workplace Observations Among 199 Childcare Workers from 16 Day Nurseries.丹麦儿童保育员的体力工作需求:16 家日托中心的 199 名保育员的基于设备的测量和工作场所观察。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2020 Jul 1;64(6):586-595. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa041.
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Nov 14;5:308-313. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.010. eCollection 2017 Mar.
4
Deaths: Leading Causes for 2012.死亡:2012年的主要死因。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Aug 31;64(10):1-93.
5
The influence of family-supportive supervisor training on employee job performance and attitudes: An organizational work-family intervention.家庭支持型主管培训对员工工作绩效和态度的影响:组织工作-家庭干预。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2016 Jul;21(3):296-308. doi: 10.1037/a0039961. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
6
Effects of a Workplace Intervention Targeting Psychosocial Risk Factors on Safety and Health Outcomes.针对心理社会风险因素的工作场所干预对安全与健康结果的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:836967. doi: 10.1155/2015/836967. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
7
Use of the Environment and Policy Evaluation and Observation as a Self-Report Instrument (EPAO-SR) to measure nutrition and physical activity environments in child care settings: validity and reliability evidence.使用环境与政策评估及观察作为自我报告工具(EPAO-SR)来测量儿童保育机构中的营养和身体活动环境:效度和信度证据
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Sep 26;12:124. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0287-0.
8
Integrating health promotion and occupational safety and health in manufacturing worksites: Perspectives of leaders in small-to-medium sized businesses.在制造业工作场所整合健康促进与职业安全和健康:中小型企业领导者的观点。
Work. 2015;52(1):169-76. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152038.
9
Review of measures of worksite environmental and policy supports for physical activity and healthy eating.工作场所对身体活动和健康饮食的环境及政策支持措施综述。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 May 7;12:E65. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140410.
10
Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies.一生中的握力:来自英国十二项研究的标准数据。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e113637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113637. eCollection 2014.