Mishriky John, Stupans Ieva, Chan Vincent
BPharm(Hons). Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University. Bundoora, VIC (Australia).
BPharm, PhD. Professor and Discipline Head. Pharmacy, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University. Bundoora, VIC (Australia).
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jul-Sep;18(3):2075. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.3.2075. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
Low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly condition and a leading cause of disabilities across the globe. In Australia and other countries, there has been changes in LBP management guidelines and evidence in recent years, including the use of pharmacotherapy. Inadequately treated LBP is a burden with significant health and economic impacts. Although there is some variability, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have largely replaced paracetamol as the first-choice analgesic for non-specific LBP in many international clinical guidelines, including the current Australian Therapeutic Guidelines. More recent clinical evidence also supports that targeting LBP with the use of NSAIDs can provide superior and more effective relief of LBP symptoms compared with paracetamol. Community pharmacists are one of the most accessible and frequently visited health professionals that offer vital primary healthcare services aimed to provide enhanced clinical outcomes for patients. The position of a community pharmacist is pivotal in LBP assessment and management, from both a pharmacological and non-pharmacological standpoint, including the use of clinical guidelines, yet their roles are often not fully utilized in LBP therapy. Studies investigating the community pharmacist's views, practices, knowledge, and roles, specifically in LBP management in Australia are variable and limited. This narrative review will briefly cover the impacts of LBP, and to provide a summary on recent evidence, updates and a comparison of the Australian and international low back pain management guidelines on paracetamol vs NSAIDs in LBP, as well as pharmacists' roles and interventions in a primary healthcare setting in this context.
腰痛(LBP)是一种常见且代价高昂的疾病,也是全球残疾的主要原因。近年来,在澳大利亚和其他国家,腰痛管理指南和相关证据发生了变化,包括药物治疗的使用。未得到充分治疗的腰痛是一种负担,会对健康和经济产生重大影响。尽管存在一些差异,但在许多国际临床指南(包括现行的澳大利亚治疗指南)中,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)在很大程度上已取代对乙酰氨基酚,成为非特异性腰痛的首选镇痛药。最新的临床证据也支持,与对乙酰氨基酚相比,使用NSAIDs针对性治疗腰痛能更有效缓解腰痛症状。社区药剂师是最容易接触到且患者经常拜访的医疗专业人员之一,他们提供重要的初级医疗服务,旨在为患者改善临床治疗效果。从药理学和非药理学角度来看,包括使用临床指南,社区药剂师在腰痛评估和管理中起着关键作用,然而他们的作用在腰痛治疗中往往未得到充分发挥。在澳大利亚,针对社区药剂师在腰痛管理方面的观点、实践、知识和作用的研究参差不齐且十分有限。本叙述性综述将简要介绍腰痛的影响,并总结近期证据、更新内容,比较澳大利亚和国际上关于腰痛治疗中对乙酰氨基酚与NSAIDs的腰痛管理指南,以及在此背景下药剂师在初级医疗环境中的作用和干预措施。